Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Received Letter From Va Medical Center Director(in Reguards To Upcoming Meeting On The Complaints I Filed Against A N.p C&p Exam)

Rate this question


Bound4heaven

Question

Greetings to all,

I received a letter from the Medical Center Director in reguards to our upcoming meeting, and his response to a few demands I requested (Thank you Berta) I requested:

1) To audio tape the meeting (my wife will be driving me for witeness)

2) To have entire meeting and all past information reguaring thi issue placed in my VA medical file

3) To have a copy (FOIA) of the Disclipine action taken against the N.P that did this reckless exam.

This is what was written to me

"In response to your requests you may audio tape the meeting; we ask to do the same. You may also add anything you like to your medical record. Your Freedom of Information Act (Foia) request (the copy of the disclpine report in reference to waht was done to the N.P) your rerquest has been fowarded to a VA attorney. That process will take several weeks"

How is one to interperate this? I am thinking they had no disclpline report to start with even though the person I met with from the Medical Center Director's office said the N.P would be severely displined.

Why would they get there VA attorney involved are they scared? they know all the issues I files with the RO in reguards to the severe side effects I endured for years on the 19 different meds and that no one from the vA ever looked over my file for sidew effects, drug interactions, drug to drug interactions. I have 3 MD outside the vA who sent blasting letters to the Medical Center that I was alm,ost dead when they all saw me.

Thank you all. God bless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

because most disciplinary actions are personal and not part of a public record, for them to give you the information on what action was taken may vilate the employees rights. When the Post Office fired people all they could do was inform the new employer the dates they worked there, not the reason why they left and the circumstances on how they came to leave. You may feel you are entitled but legally they may not be allowed to tell you. Thus the VA attorney. Don;t be surprised in they are not candid and are matter of fact since they know it is being taped, so don;'t expect them to say much, other than Ho, want a cup of coffee and tell us your concerns and that they will look into it and get back with you..I might be wrong, but that is what I have seen in the past

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because most disciplinary actions are personal and not part of a public record, for them to give you the information on what action was taken may vilate the employees rights. When the Post Office fired people all they could do was inform the new employer the dates they worked there, not the reason why they left and the circumstances on how they came to leave. You may feel you are entitled but legally they may not be allowed to tell you. Thus the VA attorney. Don;t be surprised in they are not candid and are matter of fact since they know it is being taped, so don;'t expect them to say much, other than Ho, want a cup of coffee and tell us your concerns and that they will look into it and get back with you..I might be wrong, but that is what I have seen in the past

That's right Mike- some stuff is not public record-

but if you wait long enough and then file another FOIA you might get an employee who screws up and sends private info- that has happened to my many times with VA FOIAs and even Dept of LAbor-

Bound - it is SOP to send an FOIA to the VA attorney- I just got a reply from the VA attorney in Washington-as I directed my recent FOIA to VACO-

each VARO and VAMC has a specific VA attorney to handle FOIA requests.

In my case, I did not accept their reply and I filed an appeal with a very good reason, and a VA regulation. If you dont accept what you get but it isn't a denial you can still appeal it. STate you accept their reply as a denial.

They have to cite the regs they are using in 5 USC 552, if they deny your FOIA request.

Your appeal rights will be spelled out right in the denial letter.

This is odd- FOIAs can takes weeks , months or years-

Some guy called me from Washington years ago about a FOIA I had sent them and I had sent so many that I couldn't remember what it was about-

then it hit me- I had paid 100 bucks for an FDA disk on side affects and wrongful deaths from certain meds that VA dispenses-in 1995-

my PC was so old at that time I didn't even really read the whole disk and had won my claim on wrong meds contributing to my husband's death anyhow-I got the FOIA call in 2002 I think-

I have Ken Starr's (pre Clinton-Lewinsky) signature on lots of FOIA responses on stuff I sent for because he was the Solicitor General at the time and handled appeals on FOIA.

The type of disciplinary report you are looking for is a 10-2633 but this might be very difficult to get.

However- this form is only protected under 38 USC Sec 5705 (Confidentiality) -If in fact your complaint goes to a Board of Investigation, and that board generates the 10-2633 -and through that investigation an incident report is generated, this is NOT a confidential report.

It would be great to find out whethere this complaint went to a Board of Investigation in the VA system.

Also see Dept of Veterans Affairs VHA , Washington, DC M-2 Part 1, Chap 35, April 7,1995

IRMP formerly PIR

Edited by Berta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use