Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Could Just Strangle Somebody

Rate this question


stillhere

Question

I would appreciate someone with the ability to explain the results of my hearing test going into the service and coming out.

Pre induction test R 250 - 500=15, 1,000=15, 2,000=10, 3,000 -,4000=30

L 250- 500=10, 1,000=15, 2,000=15, 3,000- 4,000=10

separation test R 250- 500=15, 1,000=15,2,000=15, 3,000-, 4,000=15

L 250- 500=15, 1,000=15,2,000=15, 3,000-, 4,000=15

Do you see what I see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

DaNang

Yes, I agree those numbers are rather suspicious. However, it does not necessarily mean that you cannot be awarded SC for hearing loss. Like you, my hearing was rated "normal" upon separation, but I am now SC for hearing loss because my audiologist offered the opinion that my hearing loss was "most likely due to military service". Even more important than the degree of hearing loss to your rating is "speech differentiation".

Let me explain what "speech differentiation" means. The brain "converts", for example, the word "fork" into an image of a three pronged object for eating. If someone said "fork" to you in Chinese, you may hear what they said, but you probably would not understand (speech discriminate) they wanted you to pass them the fork..you just would not make that connection. In a similar way, people who are hard of hearing loose speech discrimination over time. The brain looses its ability to know what a "fork" is..almost like they heard the word, but it was spoken in Chinese. I have about 90% speech discrimination. That means 10% of what I hear falls into cyberspace, and I dont get it. The VA does understand this, in their ratings, and speech discrimination is more heavily weighted than actual hearing loss. The speech discrimination test is when the audiologist asks you to "say the word popcorn"..if you say popcorn, you got it. But if you say, "tin horn" you heard the word..but did not get it.

Of course, the VARO still tried, at least twice, to deny my benefits. However, by the time people reach the BVA, they require they know how to read and write! Regional Office employees do not have to know how to read and write, they put :lol: on the "Claim Denied" rubber stamp so they can tell which one to use.

Seriously, the regulations state, to the effect, that the rating specialist can not use his unsubstantiated opinion to "trump" a qualified Audiologist's opinion about your hearing loss. The only one qualified to oveturn the above opinion, is ANOTHER Audiologist. This is often why the VA calls for C&P exams. In a C&P exam, the VARO decides who the examiner is to be, not the Veteran, so they often hire and pick someone who will be on their side..not the Veterans side. This is just one way that some states pay Veterans less compensation than other states...they hire "consultant" physicians to do C&P exams. They then give that physician a rubber stamp that says either, "Veterans disability due to Veterans own misconduct" or, if the doc likes you, "Veterans disability not likely caused by military service". At the end of the year, "bonuses" are paid, not to how many Veterans are helped, or whether or not the claims backlog was reduced, but based on how brown your nose is.

I had to put a little humor in there to keep from going nuttier....

You were doing well....ok until you got the ponit that you accused the va of fraud. Hey I know the va makes mistakes, but did you know it is eaiser to get a claim approved than denied... that is because to deny it has to be justified in writing with reasons...VA employees do not care if a claim is approved or denied they stlll get paid regardless.... how silly you sound.

To say the va hires someone to test your hearing just to screw you out of compensation is just plain ignorant! I for one want to hear about the facts not some pipe dream you might have..... of course this is JMHO but I am sure it is shared by many

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

TEAC

I really would like to believe what you say is true..that there is no fraud in the VA. However, "just in case", I did a google search on "Veterans Affairs Fraud" and came up with 276,000 hits. Of course, not every single instance of VA fraud is reported, and, there is always a possibility that when it has been reported, it "could" be "covered up".

It may even be possible that some Veterans dont even know how to report fraud..or report it to the wrong place and it falls through the cracks.

You say you need "proof" of this VA fraud? Rather than cite individual examples of VA employees convicted of fraud, go to the following link, and pick YOUR Favorite Example of VA Fraud, then post it on hadit!

http://www.va.gov/oig/publications/news-list.asp

Your statement about there being no fraud with the VA merely shows that the VA is doing a much better job at covering up their fraud, and keeping it from the media, than they are at eliminating fraud.

I am very pleased that the VA apparently has not defrauded you, however, the office of Attorney General says they have defrauded others.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TEAC

I really would like to believe what you say is true..that there is no fraud in the VA. However, "just in case", I did a google search on "Veterans Affairs Fraud" and came up with 276,000 hits. Of course, not every single instance of VA fraud is reported, and, there is always a possibility that when it has been reported, it "could" be "covered up".

It may even be possible that some Veterans dont even know how to report fraud..or report it to the wrong place and it falls through the cracks.

You say you need "proof" of this VA fraud? Rather than cite individual examples of VA employees convicted of fraud, go to the following link, and pick YOUR Favorite Example of VA Fraud, then post it on hadit!

http://www.va.gov/oig/publications/news-list.asp

Your statement about there being no fraud with the VA merely shows that the VA is doing a much better job at covering up their fraud, and keeping it from the media, than they are at eliminating fraud.

I am very pleased that the VA apparently has not defrauded you, however, the office of Attorney General says they have defrauded others.

I guess teac has not been going to the VA for very long and is very pleased with their work and the service. I have had good times with the VAMC and I have had BAD times and sometimes it is hard to tell which is which.

Anyhow my test that was never done at separation was with the ARMY and not the VA. I filed my claim in 1984 and received a two line denial. At the time I just said the heck with it and went on my merry way and paid for all my hearing aids, and evrything up until 2005 when I became a VA SC vet at 30%

I never knew why I was denied and quite frankly still don't know other than this last time they said NO Evidence of hearing loss while in service. I was made aware of the irregularities in the separation test by my audiologist who just reviewed all my paper work in preparation for my appeal. Even though my audiologist had my entire record at the VAMC it was never pointed out to me or discussed as to how this could have occured. I am sure that pure logic will somehow prevail in this, as there is NO WAY my hearing got better while I was working in my MOS and in a war zone. Is does not take a rocket scientist to come to that conculsion.

I would just let this drop but I erred when I did that once before and I will not to it again. I may be in for a long haul but I plan to make everyone aware of the sitiuation. I think my VA audiologist would be very interested in this if they don't already know.

My hearing is VERY bad now at the age of 59 and I have had an hearing aid since 84 so I am well aware it will take some effort on my part but I have to try and do this before I loose all my hearing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TEAC

I really would like to believe what you say is true..that there is no fraud in the VA. However, "just in case", I did a google search on "Veterans Affairs Fraud" and came up with 276,000 hits. Of course, not every single instance of VA fraud is reported, and, there is always a possibility that when it has been reported, it "could" be "covered up".

It may even be possible that some Veterans dont even know how to report fraud..or report it to the wrong place and it falls through the cracks.

You say you need "proof" of this VA fraud? Rather than cite individual examples of VA employees convicted of fraud, go to the following link, and pick YOUR Favorite Example of VA Fraud, then post it on hadit!

http://www.va.gov/oig/publications/news-list.asp

Your statement about there being no fraud with the VA merely shows that the VA is doing a much better job at covering up their fraud, and keeping it from the media, than they are at eliminating fraud.

I am very pleased that the VA apparently has not defrauded you, however, the office of Attorney General says they have defrauded others.

You need to show me where in my statement tha tI said the va does not commit fraud...

You have expanded on my statement and taken it from a specific point to a general statement....

I did not say that there is no fraud at the va, I said the va does not hire someone to do a hearing test just so that they can commit fraud...

Next time please read what I said without changing the meaning of my statement....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess teac has not been going to the VA for very long and is very pleased with their work and the service. I have had good times with the VAMC and I have had BAD times and sometimes it is hard to tell which is which.

You should not assume anything, I have been dealing with the va over 22 years. I presently have a tort claim in the system, I did not say the va is perfect. I said they do not hire examiners to do hearing test for the purposes of Fraud... and to think otherwise is just plain ignorant.

I never knew why I was denied and quite frankly still don't know other than this last time they said NO Evidence of hearing loss while in service.

You are not the first veteran that this has happened too. My case is simular, active duty records show HF hearing loss and the va in 1986 denied saying no evidence of hearing loss in service. After 18 years the va finally awarded 0% sc for hearing loss. If you can get anything over 0% for hearing loss you have a serious loss.

I wish you the best on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Stillhere:

Yes, I know what you mean. I am in my late 50's..and my hearing deteriorates by about 3-5% per year also..so I am going deaf, too. Like you, I want to get my VA claim settled before I go deaf.

So far I have worked on it since 2002..seven years.

I have worn hearing aids since about 1995, but, according to a course I took (callled "Living with hearing loss"), the average Hard of hearing (HOH) person struggles with hearing loss for 10 years before getting hearing aids. So, my guess is that you had symptoms of hearing loss about 10 years before 1984...or about 1974.

Even though I have only been 40% successful (I am rated 0% for hearing loss, 30% for depression, and 10% for tinnitus), I will still offer this advice for you that I have learned over the past 7 years of dealing with the VA:

1. ASK your audiologist to write in your report these words: "Veterans hearing loss most likely due to noise exposure during military service"...if you indeed feel that is the case.

2. DO NOT lie, ever, and dont even try to "fake" that your hearing loss is worse than it is. At least part of the reason I was awarded benefits by the BVA is that they stated to the effect that the Veterans statements were fully consistent with the evidence of record. That is, the BVA was not with me in Boot camp. they did not hear the jet engine noise, etc..etc, but I printed a googlemap of my barracks, showing its close proximity to the San Diego airport and highlighted it in yellow. I also pointed out my audiologists opinion, "most likely due to military service".

3. However, DO tell the truths that are "favorable to the Veteran". Look up regulations. Browse Hadit. Read all you can. In about 2002, the VA published a manual on hearing loss which relates

hearing loss, depression, and unemployability. I am having a little trouble finding this report, the VA may well have removed it, since it works well with Veterans claims.

4. The 7p's beat the 3 D's from the VA. "Delay, Deny, and Discredit the Veteran," are the VA's motto, but ours needs to be: "Proper Preperation Prevents Poor Performance, then Persist, and aPPEAL"

Thank you for serving our country and good luck to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use