Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Submitting Form "95" Tort (berta)

Rate this question


Bound4heaven

Question

Greetings,

I just submitted my 1151 claim and sent in all my medical evidence all IMEs. my doctor's dignosis, and progonisis from all my VA and private doctors. I included this informationm with my main 1151 calim is side effects due to medications which is the main issue with the 1151 and tort.

My question is this. Do I need to submit all this information with my form "95"? or will just filling out the claim to get the ball rolling work? (BERTA). I called the RO like Berta sugessted to get the address to submit a form "95" TORT and I was informed to send it to my VARO. The VARO has my complete file and has all my evidence, or do I not trust that and send it all in again?

I just called my RO today and they informed me that my claims for increase was just rated and sent to the DRO for check off. How long does it take by the time a claim is rated and when it is received by mail? I have never called in the past years and ever been told it is finished and has been rated. Every time I have called I get the, "were still working on it" after a year. Thank you all for your wisdom and advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

If it is going back to the DRO-they probably want the DRO and your vet rep (if you have one at the VARO) to sign off and you will hear from them-

I would call 800 every few days or so because it should not take long at all to get the results-

With the SF 95- I would make sure every question is answered- I don't recall attaching anything except the Death certificate and Autopsy to my SF 95-I did state that the veteran's medical records would reveal the instances of malpractice-I followed this all up with evidence within a month- and they also sent me a letter asking for some more stuff. In your case- it might be a good idea to attach copies of the most important IMEs and state with an enclosed letter what you are sending with the SF 95.

I do not trust the VARO to handle this form-unless they gave you the name of Regional Counsel and he/she has an office right in that VARO-possible-but that is usually not the case-

I suggest you call the OGC in Washington-

1-202-273-6660 and ask them specifically where to send it-you might get Neil Richland, an excellent VA lawyer and he is very easy to talk to-I called him two weeks ago for an address for where to send an FTCA claim for an email vet I have-

he remembered me from my Admin Review. Anyone there will tell you where it should be sent within your VISN.

Make sure it is certified or prioirty mail with a tracking slip and make sure you have a copy of it.

AT this point I would make a manila folder specifically for the SF 95 and put into it copies of any IMOs, med entries, copies of med recs- etc- anything they might possibly need.

The most important thing is to get it to them for an acknowledgement that stops the Statute of Limits.

The Statute of Limits starts on the day you became aware of the medical screw up.

That is the date they ask for in Question # 6- the day you knew of the occurence-which must be within the 2 years. The other date at the bottom is the date you are signing the SF 95.

I filed in Dec 1994 over a date in 1988 beginning the malpractice BUT I used the date of the veteran's death as the day I knew malpractice had occurred,and in Dec 1994, 2 months after he died ,I was completely sure they had caused his death.

Edited by Berta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is going back to the DRO-they probably want the DRO and your vet rep (if you have one at the VARO) to sign off and you will hear from them-

I would call 800 every few days or so because it should not take long at all to get the results-

With the SF 95- I would make sure every question is answered- I don't recall attaching anything except the Death certificate and Autopsy to my SF 95-I did state that the veteran's medical records would reveal the instances of malpractice-I followed this all up with evidence within a month- and they also sent me a letter asking for some more stuff. In your case- it might be a good idea to attach copies of the most important IMEs and state with an enclosed letter what you are sending with the SF 95.

I do not trust the VARO to handle this form-unless they gave you the name of Regional Counsel and he/she has an office right in that VARO-possible-but that is usually not the case-

I suggest you call the OGC in Washington-

1-202-273-6660 and ask them specifically where to send it-you might get Neil Richland, an excellent VA lawyer and he is very easy to talk to-I called him two weeks ago for an address for where to send an FTCA claim for an email vet I have-

he remembered me from my Admin Review. Anyone there will tell you where it should be sent within your VISN.

Make sure it is certified or prioirty mail with a tracking slip and make sure you have a copy of it.

AT this point I would make a manila folder specifically for the SF 95 and put into it copies of any IMOs, med entries, copies of med recs- etc- anything they might possibly need.

The most important thing is to get it to them for an acknowledgement that stops the Statute of Limits.

The Statute of Limits starts on the day you became aware of the medical screw up.

That is the date they ask for in Question # 6- the day you knew of the occurence-which must be within the 2 years. The other date at the bottom is the date you are signing the SF 95.

I filed in Dec 1994 over a date in 1988 beginning the malpractice BUT I used the date of the veteran's death as the day I knew malpractice had occurred,and in Dec 1994, 2 months after he died ,I was completely sure they had caused his death.

Dear Berta,

Thank you so much again for all your help. God bless you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use