Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

H Vac Hearing Soon To Begin

Rate this question


Berta

Question

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Berta,

I loved Ron Abrahms comparing VBA employees to the I love Lucy show,

where Lucy & Ethel are on the candy factory line - the machine speeds up and Lucy and Ethel start hiding the candy in their pockets and blouses and hats and even start eating the candy.

Well this is what VBA employees are doing to claims and evidence, just to hurry up and get a final end product code. Our works done - BVA can deal with it now.

Ron did not mention it but taking it even further - the the BVA just passes it of to the AMC, any way they can.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this too !

Ms. Moore - VBA employee states to the effect -

There needs to be more training - employees in the mailroom are not qualified to make the

decisions that they are required to inorder to move the mail.

I have been harping on this for at least 10 years.

Ms. Moore - VBA employee states to the effect -

I get paid $75,000.00 per year.

So, I think I'm qualified to make a decision as to wheter or not something

is ready to be destroyed or shredded.

I feel this is donkey crap !

VBA had NO POLICY in regards to what can or can not be destroyed and/or shredded.

During a brief VA employee amnesty time:

Over 16,0000 items were found ready to be destroyed - but by an amnesty

grant these items were retreived.

This is shameful.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A paperless system would be wonderful - but then we also have to

question again - VBA employees taking home laptops or being able to

access their files from home and the lack of security with this.

Also, what's to say the imaging centers do not get backlogged

and start spoliating themselves.

Hell,

Just released today - the entire skematics of the President's

Marine One Helicopter were found on computer hard drives

in terrorist supportive countries.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

I have a letter from DVA to my US Senator Bob Graham.

On one issue in this letter the DVA states,

"On October 30,2001, Ms. XXXXX was asked to complete an authorization for

Release of Information which would allow us to obtain her private medical records,

this development was specifically directed by the Decision Review Officer responsible

for her appeals. Ms. XXXXX refused to assist in the development of her appeal stating

we already had the information and she was not going to send it again.

Not only had I signed several ROI forms for this - BUT my C-file also already

contained the specific private treatment records that the DRO was requesting.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Carlie is right..do we need to pay someone $75k/year to "decide" whether or not to shred a Veterans evidence? I dont think so. $10 an hour and here are the rules:

1. You shred evidence you get fired.

2. If you are not sure if it is evidence or not, DONT SHRED IT AND DONT GET FIRED.

3. If there are any doubts refer to rules #1 and #2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure a paperless system is the answer. Look at what's happening with medical records? They still can't keep those straight.

And what happens when the system "crashes"?

It takes just as long to read a claim on a screen as on a sheet of paper. So processing times really wouldn't change much.

And much easier to hit that "delete" key as to walk something to the shredder.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use