Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Dro Hearing

Rate this question


71M10

Question

Greetings all:

Will VA schedule the DRO hearing at the beginning of the review(to establish/clarify issues) or will they essentially do the Denovo review than have a hearing for your 2 cents, then finalize the decision?

Second, how long does it usually take to get a DRO hearing? My first appeal they made a decision deffered one item, wanted to give me a hearing between the SOC and SSOC (which they never issued). I cancelled that hearing (they called it a post-decisional hearing) and asked them to work the new claim and provide the SSOC on the original appeal. I now am appealing the Nov 08 claim for increase and waiting for a DRO hearing. They never have decided the deffered item from the first appeal and I am going on two years now of getting an 18+ year old added to the claim.

I suspect that most of my problems stem from a limitation of VA's ability to keep track of multiple actions. It seems the system is only set to keep track of 1 action at a time. whan a new action surfaces all other pending actions are forgotten?

Can anyone confirm this?

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

DO a search. We have been beating up DRO's a lot lately.

I had my hearing in Dec. and as of the Iris reply I got today it is still 'waiting for the tape of the hearing to be transcribed so that the process can move forward". yep, 3 months to type out a 20 minute conversation.

The DRO I had wouldn't even open up my file until the transcript was returned she said. She didn't know why I was there, she didn't add anything or ask any questions. She just sat there saying "that will be addressed when I review the claim".

All of that took place at the beginning obviously.

Good luck. I totally agree with you that they cannot multitask. My $*@& vet rep thinks just like them. "Don't put in for PTSD til we settle this issue with your back". OK......... my PTSD claim took 4 months start to finish. That's a LOTTA cash that would NOT be in my pocket, along with the medical benefits, Voc Rehab, etc. that I wouldn't have qualified for.

Ask around on here. The main players will set you in the correct path.

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DO a search. We have been beating up DRO's a lot lately.

I had my hearing in Dec. and as of the Iris reply I got today it is still 'waiting for the tape of the hearing to be transcribed so that the process can move forward". yep, 3 months to type out a 20 minute conversation.

The DRO I had wouldn't even open up my file until the transcript was returned she said. She didn't know why I was there, she didn't add anything or ask any questions. She just sat there saying "that will be addressed when I review the claim".

All of that took place at the beginning obviously.

Good luck. I totally agree with you that they cannot multitask. My $*@& vet rep thinks just like them. "Don't put in for PTSD til we settle this issue with your back". OK......... my PTSD claim took 4 months start to finish. That's a LOTTA cash that would NOT be in my pocket, along with the medical benefits, Voc Rehab, etc. that I wouldn't have qualified for.

Ask around on here. The main players will set you in the correct path.

Good luck!

I go for my hearing next Tuesday. What my rep told me is that all those transcripts have to go to Detroit to be typed up.

I will say I have been through one of these before though that was many years ago. It was much different from yours being a definite question/answer session with some questions making it clear the DRO was conversant with my file. My wife was allowed to testify too.

I'll report on how this one goes next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all tapes do indeed go to Detroit for transcription, than I understand why appeals take so long!

Detroit is my VARO and life would be much simpler if they would simply read what has been sent to them. 2 year olds follow instructions or respond to requests better than they do!

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope the older claim is still pending. ????

The DRO will probably

only have jurisdiction over what was in the SOC that you requested a hearing on-

however DROs can do more then that-

here is the DRO job description:

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:3nC0w-...us&ie=UTF-8

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, you are correct there from what I was told. The DRO barely spoke during my hearing other than to say "that isn't what this appeal is about so you will have to file a seperate claim to have that looked at". She seemed very "I can't believe I have to answer to this puke" without saying so. there was no back and forth, no questions, just me trying to explain my case and the evidence and her and my worthless NYS DVA rep sitting there looking bored. But they sure did suck up to each other in their opening and closing statements on tape. I posted their names when Spike asked and he got upset so I removed them. Well since he (the VSO I had) hasn't returned my calls and the DRO is the DRO, I could care less anymore who's name I do or don't post. This all was after they cancelled my hearing a month before and I took a day off from work, drove 60 miles and got there to be told that not only was the hearing cancelled, but that there wasn't even a VSO in the building to talk to me.

If they do send the tapes off to Detroit that is just one more problem with this system. I'm all worked up now..... sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a minute............... I just read that link Berta posted.

the DRO was supposed to review my claim BEFORE allowing it to go to a hearing????????

StageDescription1The appellant elects the DRO review process.2The DRO conducts a de novo review of the prior decision.

Reference: For more information on de novo review, see M21-1MR, Part I, 5.C.13.

3Based on a review of the evidence of record, is there enough evidence to make a new decision?

  • If yes, the DRO makes a new decision.
  • If no, the DRO
  • pursues additional evidence considered necessary to resolve the claim, and/or
  • conducts an informal conference to obtain additional evidence from the appellant and his/her representative.

So she should have reviewed my claim and evidence ahead of time???????

She didn't even know what it was I was appealing!!!!!!

It's gonna be a BAD day today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use