Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
Rating Issues
Continue Reading on HadIt.com-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 4 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
jsdwd
I saw a mention of private insurance and ERISA in another post and thought I'd comment.
ERISA (The Employment Retirement Security Act) was originally written to protect employees retirement funds from abuse by employers and union management. It became law in 1974.
Since that time it has been subverted by insurance companies to cover employee health, life and disability insurance plans under the guise of 'defined benefits plan coverage'.
It is a nasty business for consumers or claimants (Plaintiffs). Since it is a federal law, plans covered under ERISA are not subject to state insurance regulation. Most regulation of insurance is at the state level and ERISA plans are exempt. They operate at the federal level where there is (essentially) no regulation of insurance companies other than that written into the law itself (minimal protection for claimants). Suits brought against insurers at the state level are specifically pre-empted by ERISA and years can spent arranging a suit, getting discovery done and getting a court date only to have it all thrown out because of this pre-emption. Naturally, insurance companies love it. As a general rule something the insurance company likes is not good for the insured. Their primary goal is to avoid paying claims at all and, if they are forced to pay them, to delay the payment as long as possible.
If you have a dispute with an insurance company the first thing you need to find out is whether the plan is an ERISA plan or not. If it is, you need legal representation that specializes in ERISA based issues. A regular insurance lawyer (who handles auto or workmen's comp. cases, for example) won't give you good representation.
I have been down this path and it is a rocky road indeed. Getting proper (ERISA knowledgeable) legal help right away is a must. You must begin building what is called an "adminsitrative records". Watch out for Google searches on ERISA. Much of what is written is published by attorneys who represent employers in ERISA matters and it is biased. A couple of sites are:
http://www.californiainsurancelawyerblog.com/ (NOTE - I have no relationship with any of the sites I am listing) I am listing these not to endorse them, but because they have a lot of links. If you doubt the good faith of the insurance industry, you should. See:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2401636_pf.html (I have a .pdf of this article if the link is taken down).
This site has good info and links: http://www.bostonerisalaw.com/archives/cat...-to-settle.html
Good information here (note importance of 'administrative record'): http://law.freeadvice.com/insurance_law/di...erisa-claim.htm
A private lawyer sites, but with good general description:
http://www.bryant-cantorna.com/erisa.html
http://www.kantorlaw.net/Areas_of_Practice/ERISA_Claims.aspx
Like the VA Disability process and the Social Security Disability process, the best weapon you have to arm yourself with is information. ERISA is complicated and beyond the lay person's ability to figure it out. There is voluminous case law. Get help, but make sure the help you get is knowledgeable. A lot of lawyers don't take ERISA cases because attorney fees are not (as a general rule) awarded in addition to the claim. In fact, the there are also no punitive damages (no penalty for abusing and lying to claimants). Thus, the most a claimant can get is what he or she would have gotten had the insurer paid the claim in the first place. So out of the box, the claimant is at best going to get 60 cents on a dollar and in most cases, they end up with half of that.
I told you the insurance companies love it.
If you are covered under an ERISA plan watch out! It is so bad that the little pamphlet you get describing your coverage doesn't even have to accurate. Your actual coverage is covered by a long plan that the insurance company will go to any length to keep you from seeing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
5
2
2
1
Popular Days
Jun 29
7
Jun 30
4
Top Posters For This Question
jsdwd 5 posts
john999 2 posts
vaf 2 posts
jbasser 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 29 2009
7 posts
Jun 30 2009
4 posts
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now