Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue Claim?

Rate this question


jlshand

Question

Because, apparently its impossible to be TOO petty for the VAROs, would this fact qualify for a CUE claim?

After only one privately done OGTT diagnosing DM11, the P.A at the VA clinic filled a private prescription for Metformin and has been refilling ever since.

If my claim comes to taking another DM2 diagnostic and they insist it be the cheaper glucose tolerance test which has not shown my DM11 (very common thing), would I have grounds for a Cue claim?

Based upon agree ment to treat (the Metformin) implying agreement with diagnosis?

Opinions please? Just trying to cover all the bases since the VA will do ANYTHING! By the way, I realize I could/should just as easily pay for another OGTT myself but....... I'm just getting in warfare mode

Thanks :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Guest Berta

A CUE claim can only be filed on a final claim decision that was never appealed-

There is more CUE info at my hadit blog-

I dont quite understand your question-

The VA can diagnose diabetes with the Glucose Tolerance test, the Blood chem reports, and/or the HB1AC test.

Under Glucose -in your VA blood chem records or under HB1AC they should have values there as to what your readings were.

From: http://www.fpnotebook.com/END11.htm

"Diagnostic Criteria

Random Serum Glucose

Serum Glucose over 200 mg/dl with symptoms

Fasting Serum Glucose

Serum Glucose exceeds 126 mg/dl on 2 different days

Cutoff Reduced from 140 cutoff by ADA (1997)

Postprandial Glucose (2 hours post meal)

Serum Glucose over 200 mg/dl

Precedes fasting glucose increase

More predictive of Diabetes Mellitus Complications

Casual Plasma Glucose (random glucose)

Same criteria as postprandial glucose

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGGT)

Two hour Glucose Tolerance Test (75 gram) >200 mg/dl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Berta!

Sorry for the confusion.

I'm trying to anticipate the expected denial and covering all my bases, looks like prematurely.

I have one private MD diagnosis of DM11 via OGTT. I am assuming the VA will require another DM test no matter what. and that they wont want to pay for the OGTT but rather the cheaper and less proficient fasting glucose test. I have previously passed this This is apparently quite a recurring happening but of course the VA will "nothing" about the movement to the OGTT as a more definitive diagnostic of DM 2! Since they had already agreed to treat via the metformin, thought I might have an implied agreement with the OGTT diagnosis .....or a case for mistreatment. Guess I thought wrongly that that was what a CUE is for

Edited by jlshand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Berta

You think like me- always hope for the best but assume the worst!

"or a case for mistreatment" yeah-

If the VA medical records reveal anything that strongly suggested diabetes but they did not follow up on it- that sure might be a Sec 1151 claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

Well, after reading all the stuff on this and other Vets nets it really is hard to give the VA any benefit of the doubt. I mean, are any claims automatic? Or do they scratch and fight you even for the obvious? Seems so!

Anyway, my VA / service records aren't going to show any indication of DM2. First of all, I'm the guy who was told by NARA they had loaned my service records to the VARO which then told me they had no idea where those records are and havent gotten them from the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE???? Don't all the sites tell everyone the old DOD records were all sent to NARA???

My DM2 was diagnosed by my private internist, nothing in any of the VA records. I was just using them for lower cost meds. If I left it to the VA alone of course they would totally deny service connection for the heart problems that have developed ,my internist and cardiologist believe, from the undiagnosed DM2

The thrust of my original ? in this thread really showed my mis- understanding of the CUE. I thought I might use it to show they made a clear error giving me Metformin based on only the OGTT from my private MD.

Guess I'm trying to avoid another unpleasant OGTT test!!! But cant be sure the cheapo test they will proscribe may not confirm DM2 . I think I read that tests on two different occasions are required for definitive diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Namvet6567

I frequently use the term "grievous error" and the VA seems to accept it. I recently assisted a vet w/a claim for DM-II, AO related and called their error "grievous, possibly reaching the level of CUE." It was under the Nehmer decision and the VA awarded the retro, stating they'd made a "grievous error." I don't care what they call it as long as we win!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use