Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Alex And P&t

Rate this question

john999

Asked by john999,

 Share

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder
john999 Grand Master

john999

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Alex

Do you still advocate taking the money and running if you are P&T. I have a couple of SMC type claims I am thinking about but they don't amount to that much money, but I hate to see the VA get away with something where I could possibly get paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Berta

Berta

Posted
Posted (edited)

John- I dont know how Alex will reply-

I for one sure believe strongly that if a veteran is eligible for SMC, they should claim it, and have VA rate it and compensate them.

I actually believe too- that if many of you look at some of your older decisions, where VA stated they considered you for SMC but denied due to whatever- that in fact-some of you might have met at least the HB or A & A criteria, by medical evidence, when they stated that-

If it was not Nodded within that year, then only a re-open or a CUE can recover it.

I had a new POA when I got my 1997 decision as to Rod's accrued. They said he was not eligible for SMC.

Then VARO stated twice 'he was not eligible under any circumstance'.

Yeah right- when I got a little smarter on SMC and the fact that he was declared 100% due to 1151 disabilities as well as 100% SC PTSD-it hit me that they snookered me big time-and my new POA rep never picked up on this either.

My SMC CUE claim is in progress supported by medical evidence and VA case laws and regs on that.

I do not believe that the ROs go out of their way to really try to determine SMC eligibility in most cases- when they might award 100% P & T yet state that SMC was considered but denied.

I have never seen any follow up reasons and bases in many claims like that- as to how they did deny the SMC.

Say a vet has PTSD and the evidence reveals, he is danger to himself and others, has also agoraphobia,

paranoia and suicidal ideation. Family statements indicate he cannt be left alone.

The VA would grant the TDIU or 100% probably, say they consider SMC and denied, and yet the vet might well be Housebound based on the evidence they already have- the VA is supposed to consider you for any benefit that you are eligible for.

see what I mean?

I think the SMC denials tacked onto sc awards are rubber stamped in most cases.

After a long ordeal to even get the proper SC award, I think many vets accept the denial of SMC without questioning how they arrived at the denial.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      sakata
      sakata earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      alexpainter
      alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Lebro
      Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      catyvaz1
      catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      AFguy1999
      AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Our picks

    • VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Are all military medical records on file at the VA?

      RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,

      I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
      RichardZ

      Picked By

      RichardZ,
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept