Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fort Gordon Ao Exposure Bva Decision Now Posted

Rate this question


jamescripps2

Question

The decision has now been posted to the BVA website. The citation Nr. is 0941553. It has been more than 100 days since the BVA decision and I still await a rating decision. I just hope that the rating decision and the EED are right the first time around.

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/va_searc...=&UA=Search

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This is an older post that some guests have been reading-

Nehmer only applies to incountry Vietnam vets and I did not make that clear here-

What has happened since this post is that Blue Water Navy vets may or may not fall under Nehmer-we just dont know yet- (due to the Procopio decision)

Nehmer EEds were clarified by FootnoteOne Nehmer 2010.

There is at least one other vet who has won AO due to exposure in CONUS.

There is also a CUE case at the CAVC regarding a better EED under AO-I have very little info on it yet-NVLSP is handling it.

Apparently the veteran is a AO vet but did not fall under Nehmer so he cued his past AO denial because he now has AO comp-it sounds great but I do not have any info on it yet.

Any veteran who gets SC, but was denied in the past for the same disability that does become SC, should definitely check their older decisions and our CUE forum here to see if they can garner more retro under CUE ( or under 38 CFR 3.156-for more retro.

If VA denied a SC you have now, in the past, there is always the chance they made a Clear and Unmistakable Error in the original denial. A successful CUE claim can garner you more comp retro ----depending on the circumstances of the denial.

A CUE claim rests on established evidence in VA's possession at time of the decision being CUEd..

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

to add:James had continuously  prosecuted his claim and did get the proper retro amount.

Since he did not fall under Nehmer, and if he had a denial in a past decision for the same disability- he could have filed CUE to obtain more retro.

Secretary wilkie is trying to take CUE regulations away from us----I posted that info in our AO forum under Blue Water Navy- AO-NVLSP

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Apparently, that poison was used everywhere...

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks James- and again CONGRATS on this fabulous award and your impeccable work to support your claim.

This pdf (14 pages long) in this post might give you an idea of how these claims under Nehmer are supposed to be handled-regardless of whatever the AO disability is:

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=33640

I got a good laugh-in the December post I predicted my AO award would be wrong because of past experiences with them-and sure enough- after 282 days the VA awarded me some of my money-and messed up the AO part of the claim.

They did send the check for what they decided last week.

Also I thought the VA had issued another Fast Letter fairly recently due to the ROs holding back on retro due from BVA awards.I mentioned this and a vet here did as well in some past replies here but I haven't found that letter yet-

The PDF is quite involved- did they send my AO claim to the C & P place? as this letter indicates they should have? -nope-I sent it there myself-

I am convinced that since AO often involves considerable retro-they will do all they can to stave off the payment of retro -in some cases.

Have you checked IRIS or 800# for a status lately?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta, I never filed a claim before October 2005. I understand that Nehmer class claims only have to do with previouslly denied decisions and therefore would not be applied to my claim. Am I right about this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right James- I forgot that this was your initial claim--

any past denied claim for same AO disability-in most cases-will get date of the filing of the denied claim as the Nehmer EED.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use