Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
  
 Read Disability Claims Articles 
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

No Comment - Please Read

Rate this question


shag

Question

this may need to be read twice. It is from a vet's remand from the BVA. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: 1. The AMC should send the Veteran's claims folder to the examiner who conducted the April 2004 and December 2004 VA heart examinations, or if the examiner is no longer available, a suitable replacement, to request that he prepare an addendum to his report. The Veteran need not be re-examined unless an examination is deemed necessary. If a physical examination is deemed necessary, all indicated testing should be accomplished. The claims files should be made available to and reviewed by the examiner. With reference to supporting data, the examiner is asked to offer a complete rationale for his opinions, expressed in the examinations referenced above, that it is less likely than not that the Veteran's hypertension or heart disease are related to or aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected PTSD. Hard to believe that one.

Edited by shag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Is that for real???

They are actually saying that the examiners has to state "is less likely than not"?????

NO Way!

Then again, it may be that the examiners alread stated this and didn't supply the reasoning for his decision. Then they are asking for him to give this reasoning so the case can be adjudicated,

But if he's not working there anymore they want someone else to write the old doctors reasoning?????

Why didn't they just order a new c&p?

this may need to be read twice. It is from a vet's remand from the BVA. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: 1. The AMC should send the Veteran's claims folder to the examiner who conducted the April 2004 and December 2004 VA heart examinations, or if the examiner is no longer available, a suitable replacement, to request that he prepare an addendum to his report. The Veteran need not be re-examined unless an examination is deemed necessary. If a physical examination is deemed necessary, all indicated testing should be accomplished. The claims files should be made available to and reviewed by the examiner. With reference to supporting data, the examiner is asked to offer a complete rationale for his opinions, expressed in the examinations referenced above, that it is less likely than not that the Veteran's hypertension or heart disease are related to or aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected PTSD. Hard to believe that one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HELLO

Is that for real???

They are actually saying that the examiners has to state "is less likely than not"?????

NO Way!

Then again, it may be that the examiners alread stated this and didn't supply the reasoning for his decision. Then they are asking for him to give this reasoning so the case can be adjudicated,

But if he's not working there anymore they want someone else to write the old doctors reasoning?????

Why didn't they just order a new c&p?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remands! Remands! We don't need no stinking remands. *If the VA examiner woould just answer all, yes all questions on their pre-prepared exam sheets. There would be no stinking remands. But I am not saying any thing.......except "we don't need no stinking remands"!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use