Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronic Left Lumbar Radiculopathy

Rate this question


cannoncocker

Question

I am scheduled for a lumbar exam next week and would like to hear from someone who has been through that experience in order to better know what to expect.

Thank you

Could not find a beeter place to post this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Vaf if you help much more if I had a payroll I'd be compelled to add you. I went to the QTC Severity Exam on 4/19 and have since heard comments pointing to common complaints regarding QTC as opposed to VA C&P exams. I am quit cynical so regard my point of view with that assumption.

I have been examined by both and have not really experienced any more bias from one than the other. That just being me so that's hardly scientific evidence. In my view they both have a quota, not meaning each doc has only so much they can find as SC'ed or very severe etc. That would not be functional or possible to implement. I think it is easier for the VA to control outcomes with less cupability though than sending a memo to each VARO saying our budget is this so you must meet X$'s by outsourcing. That sounds ridiculous to some but I do not believe VA raters are just thinking up ways to down rate back problems just for kicks. I believe it is plain institutional policy driven by budget. Hence this Lumbar Strain nonsense. Here a rater is reading a radiology report: large L5 Protrusion pushing S1 to forward facet. Similar on up the lumbar/Degenerative disease/...= strain. That doesn't even pass the laugh test. Budget?

That is very beneficial information about the goniometer(plastic hand held low tech angle finder) that he did in fact use this time which they would otherwise guesstimate the distance which could make the difference from one rating to the next, all this after 1 year earlier finding my spine in normal condition. Yes, same QTC Doc, but he did a thorough exam and it did in fact help to haul in all my radiology reports, discs, reports, and etc. He sent his nurse out front to get some radiology reports from past MRI's and Flexions. Which ones she picked I do not have a clue but otherwise they are running on just their own opinion rather than having to knowingly report contrary to previous findings. I have no doubt this gentleman is very competent but what I do not know are QTC's marching orders and the raters actual boundaries. I will report back when the rating is in, but it stands at 20% now from the VA.

For future examinees:

Lumbar Spine Exam

bend forward

bend lateral left and right

bend back

twist left and right

SLR bilateral

reflexes

verbal history (on their questionaire I was rather expansive so that either surprising, irritating, or both to him but hey I wanted him to have all the info I could get to him).

dorsiflex bilateral feet

no wood pin pricking but light touch for numb and tingling areas

3 xrays 1. flat on your back 2. left side 3. right side.

the end.

possible checks for truthfulness for example seating you then straighten leg for some other reason then observe reaction. Many more of those possible.

That pretty much covers my experience which no doubt will vary from doc to doc and place to place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaf if you help much more if I had a payroll I'd be compelled to add you.

Thanks! We've found that most of the justice we've received for my husband's claims has come from the Board and the Court, not the VARO. The good news is that my husband was eventually rated 100% schedular, but we had to scrape for every inch of that over 17 years, and are still fighting for an earlier effective date. He holds ratings for both lumbar and cervical spine problems, so I do understand the difficulty in getting anything over 10% or 20% without a major struggle. Evidence eventually wins out, the challenge is getting someone to actually read it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I agree! Hopefully our cases will not need to go to the board or CAVC in order to be resolved correctly.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

The straight leg test stretches the sciatic nerve. If your foot is dorsiflexed ((pulled backward, like they are supposed to) it puts pressure on the sciatic nerve, so when they apply dorsiflexion and then lift your straight leg they can look for a reaction. Plantar flexion (the foot/toes pointed down) releases some of this tension on the nerve during a straight leg test so when they raise your leg it should hurt less. They also sometimes to test with a bent knee (releases pressure, doesn't cause stretching) and I had one guy push on the top of my head for a lumbar exam (no load borne by lumbar spine, so no pain).

Vaf if you help much more if I had a payroll I'd be compelled to add you. I went to the QTC Severity Exam on 4/19 and have since heard comments pointing to common complaints regarding QTC as opposed to VA C&P exams. I am quit cynical so regard my point of view with that assumption.

I have been examined by both and have not really experienced any more bias from one than the other. That just being me so that's hardly scientific evidence. In my view they both have a quota, not meaning each doc has only so much they can find as SC'ed or very severe etc. That would not be functional or possible to implement. I think it is easier for the VA to control outcomes with less cupability though than sending a memo to each VARO saying our budget is this so you must meet Xs by outsourcing. That sounds ridiculous to some but I do not believe VA raters are just thinking up ways to down rate back problems just for kicks. I believe it is plain institutional policy driven by budget. Hence this Lumbar Strain nonsense. Here a rater is reading a radiology report: large L5 Protrusion pushing S1 to forward facet. Similar on up the lumbar/Degenerative disease/...= strain. That doesn't even pass the laugh test. Budget?

That is very beneficial information about the goniometer(plastic hand held low tech angle finder) that he did in fact use this time which they would otherwise guesstimate the distance which could make the difference from one rating to the next, all this after 1 year earlier finding my spine in normal condition. Yes, same QTC Doc, but he did a thorough exam and it did in fact help to haul in all my radiology reports, discs, reports, and etc. He sent his nurse out front to get some radiology reports from past MRI's and Flexions. Which ones she picked I do not have a clue but otherwise they are running on just their own opinion rather than having to knowingly report contrary to previous findings. I have no doubt this gentleman is very competent but what I do not know are QTC's marching orders and the raters actual boundaries. I will report back when the rating is in, but it stands at 20% now from the VA.

For future examinees:

Lumbar Spine Exam

bend forward

bend lateral left and right

bend back

twist left and right

SLR bilateral

reflexes

verbal history (on their questionaire I was rather expansive so that either surprising, irritating, or both to him but hey I wanted him to have all the info I could get to him).

dorsiflex bilateral feet

no wood pin pricking but light touch for numb and tingling areas

3 xrays 1. flat on your back 2. left side 3. right side.

the end.

possible checks for truthfulness for example seating you then straighten leg for some other reason then observe reaction. Many more of those possible.

That pretty much covers my experience which no doubt will vary from doc to doc and place to place.

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use