Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Confused Withc&p Results

Rate this question


postman56

Question

Hello all, I am seeking help to understand the opinion from the C&P results. I am currently rated at 20% for lumbar strain due to a motor vehicle accident in 12/05 while in service.

The examiners medical opinion on cervical was DDD w/stenosis, Gr 1 retrilisthesis w/spasm, Most Likely Caused By Or A Result Of MVA On 12/05. I filede for pain in both shoulders and radiating pain in left arm. The examiner opined that the pain in both shoulders is not caused by the MVA 12/05, she also stated that the cervical radiculopathy is not confirmed to left arm. I do not understand this because I have pain in my left arm it feels like pins and needles shooting into my left hand where I feel numbness in my fingers. I feel this pain on a daily basis. The exaiminer did state that the veterans Cspine condition has resulted in spasm to upper body-shoulder area and decreased use of his left arm in his effort to control pain intensity (what is she saying?). Is she connecting this?

Please any imput would be helpful.

The examiners medical opinion on my lumbar states: HNP/DDD w/LLE radiculopathy, Most Likely Caused By Or a Result Of MVA On 12/05. I claimed left hip pain and left leg radiating pain as secondary to Lumbar Strain. The examiner opined that the left hip condition is less likely caused by or a result of MVA on 12/05. The examiner did state that the veterans left hip pain is largely associated w/his lumbar spine HNP/DDD w/referred neuropathic pain. Can any help me understand this, it is getting hard for me to go to work with all of this pain.

Thanks Postman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The exam doctor is ignoring the fact that pain in shoulders can be referred pain from the neck. This just so obvious. What is the exam doctor's alternative explanation as to your cervical pain and shoulder pain? In car wrecks the cervical nearly always gets at least whiplash. I got a nice whiplase that was the result of rear end collision that seemed minor at the time until the next day when I could not rasie my head off the pillow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The exam doctor is ignoring the fact that pain in shoulders can be referred pain from the neck. This just so obvious. What is the exam doctor's alternative explanation as to your cervical pain and shoulder pain? In car wrecks the cervical nearly always gets at least whiplash. I got a nice whiplase that was the result of rear end collision that seemed minor at the time until the next day when I could not rasie my head off the pillow.

Thanks for the reply John999, the examiners rationale for stateing this is bil. shoulders exrays reveals mild bil. DJD. Veteran w/limited ROM tolerance due to Cspine pain and spasms to paraspinal areas. Physical esam is not consistent w/mild bilateral a.c. seperationas is suggested as possibility in exrays. The mild DJD found on xrays is most likely a result of natural progression and not due to the accident. When I had my exam I had full body spasms with limited ROM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use