Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hearing Loss Percentages

Rate this question


Deltawife

Question

I may be crazy....but I could swear that I read something a while back that stated if a Veteran was awarded a percentage for hearing loss that the VA has changed the rules to veterans getting additional increase on disability for each ear. (I hope that makes sense)

If you know anything about this please let me know.

Thanks in advance

Patt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

nope, never heard of that. The exam they give u has to fit a certain criteria. if only one ear qualifies you can still be rated for hearing loss in that ear, but they dont give u anything additional for ears unless there;s an actual disease, like otitis media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be crazy....but I could swear that I read something a while back that stated if a Veteran was awarded a percentage for hearing loss that the VA has changed the rules to veterans getting additional increase on disability for each ear. (I hope that makes sense)

If you know anything about this please let me know.

Thanks in advance

Patt

Patt I do not understand what you are asking and I am real surprised that the other poster does.

I have hearing loss and each ear is evaluated and your hearing loss is based on your overall ability to hear if that is what you mean? In other words I am deaf or (can not test)in my right ear and my left ear is at 45 I think so the VA puts the 2 together to come up with a rating for hearing loss.

I can not be rated 100% for my left and say 40% for my right. They combine the two to rate you and an overall hearing loss %.

I hope I did not confuse you more. If you want the official jargon i can get it for you.

By the way if you have active and profound otis media 9which I had in Nam once) you will be rated totally separate for that.

Edited by stillhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patt I do not understand what you are asking and I am real surprised that the other poster does.

I have hearing loss and each ear is evaluated and your hearing loss is based on your overall ability to hear if that is what you mean? In other words I am deaf or (can not test)in my right ear and my left ear is at 45 I think so the VA puts the 2 together to come up with a rating for hearing loss.

I can not be rated 100% for my left and say 40% for my right. They combine the two to rate you and an overall hearing loss %.

I hope I did not confuse you more. If you want the official jargon i can get it for you.

By the way if you have active and profound otis media 9which I had in Nam once) you will be rated totally separate for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Deltawife

No, I dont think you are crazy. I think you are referring to a condition closely related to hearing loss, tinnitus, that is, ringing in the ears.

Tinnitus is, if SC and severe enough, is rated at 10%. That is, a Single 10%, not 10% for tinnitus for each ear. I am pretty sure there are some court cases pending which may allow tinnitus to be rated at 10% for EACH ear, if eligible, and not JUST one 10%, if the Veteran prevails in the court cases.

I dont think this future court ruling will affect hearing loss because, if you look at the hearing loss charts, both ears are rated. (the "poorer" ear). These court cases may possibly have already been decided, but I am not aware that they have.

The VA has "interpreted" the regulations on tinnitus to mean that only one single 10% evaluation may apply, regardless if the tinnitus is in both ears. Apparently the rationale is that ringing in the ears "comes from your head" and not from one ear or the other. I have tinnitus, and when I do have an episode, it is very unclear which "ear" it is coming from. In other words the ringing does not "stop" if I put a pillow over one ear, or both ears..it keeps on ringing.

However, sometimes my tinnitus DOES appear to originate from one ear or the other, such as when I hear a gunshot or other loud noise. My ears will often ring afterwards, and it usually starts from the ear closest to the loud noise, but then spreads to both ears.

I think there is such a thing as "trauma tinnitus", such as if a bomb exploded near one ear, but did not kill you, just traumatized your hearing. In at least that case, I think you could have tinnitus in one ear, but not the other. Of course, if the explosion was equal distance to both ears, then both ears could have "trauma tinitus". Altho some of what I am posting here is "conjecture", I think this is basically what is happening. I think one or more Vets are suing the VA for TWO 10% tinintus ratings, one for each ear. I do know that when I do have an episode of tinnitus, it can be very severe, literally driving you nuts, and often leading to migraines, depending upon how long an episode lasts. My tinnitus episodes vary in both degree and duration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deltawife

No, I dont think you are crazy. I think you are referring to a condition closely related to hearing loss, tinnitus, that is, ringing in the ears.

Tinnitus is, if SC and severe enough, is rated at 10%. That is, a Single 10%, not 10% for tinnitus for each ear. I am pretty sure there are some court cases pending which may allow tinnitus to be rated at 10% for EACH ear, if eligible, and not JUST one 10%, if the Veteran prevails in the court cases.

I dont think this future court ruling will affect hearing loss because, if you look at the hearing loss charts, both ears are rated. (the "poorer" ear). These court cases may possibly have already been decided, but I am not aware that they have.

The VA has "interpreted" the regulations on tinnitus to mean that only one single 10% evaluation may apply, regardless if the tinnitus is in both ears. Apparently the rationale is that ringing in the ears "comes from your head" and not from one ear or the other. I have tinnitus, and when I do have an episode, it is very unclear which "ear" it is coming from. In other words the ringing does not "stop" if I put a pillow over one ear, or both ears..it keeps on ringing.

However, sometimes my tinnitus DOES appear to originate from one ear or the other, such as when I hear a gunshot or other loud noise. My ears will often ring afterwards, and it usually starts from the ear closest to the loud noise, but then spreads to both ears.

I think there is such a thing as "trauma tinnitus", such as if a bomb exploded near one ear, but did not kill you, just traumatized your hearing. In at least that case, I think you could have tinnitus in one ear, but not the other. Of course, if the explosion was equal distance to both ears, then both ears could have "trauma tinitus". Altho some of what I am posting here is "conjecture", I think this is basically what is happening. I think one or more Vets are suing the VA for TWO 10% tinintus ratings, one for each ear. I do know that when I do have an episode of tinnitus, it can be very severe, literally driving you nuts, and often leading to migraines, depending upon how long an episode lasts. My tinnitus episodes vary in both degree and duration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use