Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Confused On Which Form To Send To Varo

Rate this question


emptyshell

Question

I am going to send evidence in to the VARO because I believe they made a mistake...from what I can tell on the effective date of paying out my award.

I have an earlier initial effective date (evidence to support this)than they do. All I want to do is have my local VARO look into it and see if I was right and they have to pay me accordingly. I have about 4 more months to go before I run out of the 1 year law.

Now I can only find a motion to reconsider that would go to BVA. But I believe that since the VARO is the one who granted me the claim and awarded me with that date that they should be the ones who should look into this. I have heard some say you might not want to waste your time with a request for reconsideration and get that NOD in now before the time line is up. But is there a form that you need to use if your sending it directly to your VARO. Also do I need to let them know that I am requesting this to be handled by the DRO? I read somewhere that if you do not make it clear then they will send it to the BVA for appeal???

I am confused and time is ticking...what should I do??? My real initial claim for Jan. 1994 and they paid my award for starting Nov 1994. I had opened a new claim(totally different from this claim) in Oct.19 1994 and they have got it mixed up with a wrong effective date.

a Why can't they ever make it easy for us VETS..they always seem to make everything so messed up you either get so fed up and quit your seeking a claim or you have a stroke or heart attack from dealing with the frustration...I guess they are hoping either one will happen and your one less person to deal with..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

I understand your frustration, and am in the same "boat".

I recommend you file a Notice of Disagreement, something like this:

Notice of Disagreement

I disagree with the Regional Office Decision dated May 4, 2010 and plan to contest the result with a DRO review as to the following issues:

1. I disagree with the effective date of the claim as I actually applied for benefits on 11/30/04, contrary to the RO decision. A copy of my application on this date is enclosed.

(Clearly state your reasons why you feel the earlier effecitve date is justified...you had an informal claim at the docs office, your paperwork got lost, the claim was overlooked, etc.)

The NOD should always

a) be in writing

b) express dissatisfaction with the decision and indicate a desire to appeal

c) identify the RO decision by date

d) identify the issue(s) you are disputing

e) be signed by the Veteran

f) be mailed to the RO (or hand delivered) and I suggest it be sent Certified Mail, Return Receipt requested with the Veteran keeping a copy.

Many people say "This is your chance to tell your side of the story" and use the NOD to present your case and cite evidence as to why you think the decision was wrong. Some Veterans take a great amount of time, thoroughly research the case law, CFR's, Fast letters, etc and their own evidence to their NOD. I have found that the 5 P's seems to work while other things dont work as well: Proper Preperation Prevents Poor Performance

While it is still possible to submit your "arguments" at other times, by putting it with the NOD, you can be assured that you at least got the chance to be heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use form 21-4138. You can ask for a DRO hearing if you want to present your evidence face to face. But whatever you do, file before the 1 year is up.

Edited by johnjjr

SEMPER FI

ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use