Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Getting Dea Started... Should Be Simple, Right?

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

When I got my decision papers for my 100%, they said that my college student kid was eligible for DEA going back to the date I was given as my retro date, which was back in 2009. Yay, this will help her pay off her student loans!!

So my kid fills out the DEA application, sends it in. Gets back a letter from DEA saying she must fill out a very short form, choosing the date from which to begin receiving DEA benefits. The letter clearly states that the choices are between the 2009 date and the date I was notified of my 100% rating (December 2010). Naturally, she chooses the 2009 date to get the retro. She also has taken the letter to her college VA representative, to have them fill out & send in the VA form 1999 (certification of attendance or whatever).

So far so good, right?

Yesterday she gets a letter from the VA saying (italics mine):

"By law, VA can't pay for training you received before you became eligible for benefits. Since you became eligible for benefits on November 22, 2010 (where did this date come from???) we can pay you starting on that date. However, we can pay for the remainder of your training if you return the election sent February 28, 2011. Based on the VA Form 1999 you submitted, we recommend that you choose August 30, 2010 as your begin dated since this was the date you began training."

WTH? Okay, I can see that maybe the college didn't fill out the 1999 right, that they left out her previous year of attendance (she started at this college in fall 2008). So I'm going to call or have her visit the VA rep this week and clarify that. But what the heck is the deal with saying she became eligible on November 2010???

The really funny thing is that the letter she got stating her eligibility began in 2009 and this letter saying Nov 2010 is "signed" by the same person....

Along with this new letter was the VA Form 4107, telling her about her right to appeal. Why the heck should she have to go through the appeal process when this is such a clear bungle?

I'm so mad I could spit nails. I really feel like this is almost intentional, because her first reaction was "Rats, that stinks... oh well..." She doesn't know any better, and would just let it drop.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

VA Educational department is sometimes an oxymoron.Sometimes however they get smart enough to confuse and confound an issue and that can always cause a claimant cash.

They did this to me when my recent award altered my DEA eligibility date.I picked the most favorable date because I might return to AMU for next degree.If I had picked the date THEY requested that I pick- I would have been in the crapper as far as my DEA retro went.

I had to really read the date choices carefully since VA owed me about 6 thousand in retro due to the new award letter of 2010.

So I was able to pick a date that not only covered the retro time frame for which they they owed me but also which gave me the best opportunity to complete a 2 years Bachelors in part time attendance which might take me 3-4 years under my new eligibility.

They tried to screw my daughter out of 7 years of DEA due to her 26th birthday but they missed her DD 214 and 7 years Military service on the application but they immediately dropped that idea when I prepared a NOD for her with a copy of the regs.That only took 3 weeks to resolve.

I realize now I could have asked them to CUE themselves instead.

If VA Edu makes a clear and unmistakable error in any DEA matter like wrong eligibility date etc- ask them to go CUE themselves and send them copy of the law they manipulated but make sure if you don't hear from them soon, to file a NOD.

VA EDU department does work on Nods much faster than the RO regarding SC claims-in my experience.

The good part about VA EDU is that once the eligibilty and college matriculation stuff is done, they are usually very good to deal with.

I had to pay my tuition first and then after they checked my course status, they sent the check. I could never depend on exactly when it would come but it did seem to work fairly smoothly as I coordinated my tuition payments and course info with the school's VA counselor and with VA EDU by email every semester.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the good advice, everyone... nope, NOT giving up. And certainly not making the trip to the VARO if I can help it. I start feeling a panic attack coming on just thinking about it. And I'd have to go with my daughter because I don't trust them not to shine her on. Argh, I'm having heart palpitations just thinking about it! Deep breaths... deep breaths....

I'm waiting to hear back from the school's VA Rep. From what my daughter said, she's not the most pleasant person to deal with. I want to know from her exactly what dates of attendance were put on the Form 1999, and maybe get a copy of it.

Berta, I know I should be able to find this, but can you help me find the law they violated? If you could point me in the right direction, I'd really appreciate it. I'm heading now to find info on how to request a CUE.

thanks again!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UPDATE!

Just talked to the Director of Financial Aid at the college, who handles the VA Rep duties. Turns out she didn't read VA Certificate of Eligibility past the first line that mentions the date of my rating being determined. She only reported my daughter's attendance for the past year of school and didn't certify back to the earlier 2009 date of eligibility.

She's going to call the VA to find out how to fix it. Also, she agreed (hesitantly) to call me back and let me know what happens.

So maybe she can fix this mess?!?

Oh, I do believe in Financial Aid Directors, I do believe in Financial Aid Directors, I do I do I do!!!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just state, "Under auspices of 38 USC, 5109, I claim that the VA has made a clear and unmistakable error to my detriment."

And then state basically what the VSO meant:

"My VSO said to send them a letter saying essentially "hey, pay attention! Eligibility date is 2009. That date was chosen. School verified enrollment" and that would settle it.

(That is your daughter has to do this. You can write it for her but she has to sign it)

"She also has taken the letter to her college VA representative, to have them fill out & send in the VA form 1999 (certification of attendance or whatever)."

"I can see that maybe the college didn't fill out the 1999 right, that they left out her previous year of attendance (she started at this college in fall 2008)"

That date should be fixed too.The VA 1999 form includes not only the school's attendance verification but also an audit of the tuition that was paid.

GEE- I was looking up my emails to and from VA and AMU to see what was there that could help you but you posted this update!

My school made the same error itself on the years of my attendance.

SHE should fix this herself! Disregard my suggestion of CUE.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHE should fix this herself!

Berta, you mean the school FAO/Vet Rep, right? It's okay if I help my daughter with this, isn't it?

Thanks so much for all your help with this. I'm printing out your reply and filing it right now so I can find it later!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"you mean the school FAO/Vet Rep, right?"

Yes

" It's okay if I help my daughter with this, isn't it?"

Yes-of course- I didn't mean your daughter made any error at all and you certainly can help her.

However- I tried to ask VA EDU a question regarding my daughter's DEA years ago and the VA replied that I sort of had no business asking this specific question about her DEA because she was an adult (and serving in the Military at the time) and she had to ask the question since they were her benefits.

She had been in the Mil for 3-4 years by then, had been overseas , and had a sensitive Intel clearance yet I was still wondering if she always looked in both directions before she crossed the street. :unsure:

They are always our babies I guess ,Hedgey and I sure hope the FAO rep can straighten this all out for your daughter.

My daughter,when she got the erroneous DEA letter , was furious because she said here it was her very first contact as a veteran,with the VA -and they couldn't even handle that right.

I just said Honey-Welcome to my World.

This is SOP for the VA. :angry:

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use