Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tbi Retro Payment Letter

Rate this question


grent

Question

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF ANY ONE RECEIVED A TBI TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY LETTER MARCH OF 2009. THE LETTER WAS TO VETERANS RATED FOR TBI. IT WAS ABOUT A RETRO PAYMENT.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF ANY ONE GOT A RETRO PAYMENT YET ON THIS ISSUE.THE NEW EVALUATION CRITERIA BECAME EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 2008 ACCORDING TO THE LETTER.

i SENT IN THE PAPER WORK NEVER HEARD BACK FROM THE VA.

THX

GRT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF ANY ONE RECEIVED A TBI TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY LETTER MARCH OF 2009. THE LETTER WAS TO VETERANS RATED FOR TBI. IT WAS ABOUT A RETRO PAYMENT.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF ANY ONE GOT A RETRO PAYMENT YET ON THIS ISSUE.THE NEW EVALUATION CRITERIA BECAME EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 2008 ACCORDING TO THE LETTER.

i SENT IN THE PAPER WORK NEVER HEARD BACK FROM THE VA.

THX

GRT

grent,

My letter from the VBA DID NOT indicate anything at all regarding RETRO PAYMENT for the new TBI (post Oct 2008) regs.

The letter stated to me, that the criteria in evaluating DC 8045 - Brain Trauma had changed and since I was currently SC'd for a disability

due to TBI, it maybe beneficial for me to be rated under the new criteria.

The VBA invited me to contact them about this and that a higher level of compensation could not be granted prior to a re-evaluation

under the new criteria for TBI.

I'm editing this post as I just pulled my March 19,2009 letter from my files.

It states:

"You may have been rated before the new criteria became effective.

If you still have residual symptoms, you may be re-examined based on the new criteria.

This examination may result in a compensation increase even though your condition has not changed.

You can request this examination through your local regional office on the enclosed VA Form 21-4138,

Statement in Support of Claim. If you qualify for increased compensation, the increase may be

paid up to one year retroactively, but not before October 23, 2008, when the new criteria went into effect."

The one year (12 months) that they are referring to is, with consideration of any medical evidence of record

that would support a higher evaluation for TBI (under the new criteria) that was produced anytime after

the new criteria took effect on Oct 23, 2008 - but within 12 months prior to your request for the

re-examination

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

grent,

My letter from the VBA DID NOT indicate anything at all regarding RETRO PAYMENT for the new TBI (post Oct 2008) regs.

The letter stated to me, that the criteria in evaluating DC 8045 - Brain Trauma had changed and since I was currently SC'd for a disability

due to TBI, it maybe beneficial for me to be rated under the new criteria.

The VBA invited me to contact them about this and that a higher level of compensation could not be granted prior to a re-evaluation

under the new criteria for TBI.

I'm editing this post as I just pulled my March 19,2009 letter from my files.

It states:

"You may have been rated before the new criteria became effective.

If you still have residual symptoms, you may be re-examined based on the new criteria.

This examination may result in a compensation increase even though your condition has not changed.

You can request this examination through your local regional office on the enclosed VA Form 21-4138,

Statement in Support of Claim. If you qualify for increased compensation, the increase may be

paid up to one year retroactively, but not before October 23, 2008, when the new criteria went into effect."

The one year (12 months) that they are referring to is, with consideration of any medical evidence of record

that would support a higher evaluation for TBI (under the new criteria) that was produced anytime after

the new criteria took effect on Oct 23, 2008 - but within 12 months prior to your request for the

re-examination

dr bash wrote me an imo and said the VA should award an MDC for my trau brain injury. i re sent in the letter i got with another 21-4132 see what happens. have you received a retro payment yet for this issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

grent,

My letter from the VBA DID NOT indicate anything at all regarding RETRO PAYMENT for the new TBI (post Oct 2008) regs.

The letter stated to me, that the criteria in evaluating DC 8045 - Brain Trauma had changed and since I was currently SC'd for a disability

due to TBI, it maybe beneficial for me to be rated under the new criteria.

The VBA invited me to contact them about this and that a higher level of compensation could not be granted prior to a re-evaluation

under the new criteria for TBI.

I'm editing this post as I just pulled my March 19,2009 letter from my files.

It states:

"You may have been rated before the new criteria became effective.

If you still have residual symptoms, you may be re-examined based on the new criteria.

This examination may result in a compensation increase even though your condition has not changed.

You can request this examination through your local regional office on the enclosed VA Form 21-4138,

Statement in Support of Claim. If you qualify for increased compensation, the increase may be

paid up to one year retroactively, but not before October 23, 2008, when the new criteria went into effect."

The one year (12 months) that they are referring to is, with consideration of any medical evidence of record

that would support a higher evaluation for TBI (under the new criteria) that was produced anytime after

the new criteria took effect on Oct 23, 2008 - but within 12 months prior to your request for the

re-examination

dr bash wrote me an imo for my traumatic brain injury he said they should award me an mdc for my brain injury i re-sent in another 21-4132 have you received a retro payment yet from the va in regard to this matter

thks

grt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dr bash wrote me an imo for my traumatic brain injury he said they should award me an mdc for my brain injury i re-sent in another 21-4132 have you received a retro payment yet from the va in regard to this matter

thks

grt

grent,

What the heck is "mdc".

I have not even requested to be re-evaluated under the post Oct 2008 criteria yet.

There is no automatic retro.

I do not think you are fully understanding the retro part for the new criteria.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use