Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Psycotic disorde

Psycotic Disoder And Ptsd Lower Back And Knee


Allright i have a claim for PTSD and Psycotic disorder back and knee. I started my claim in march 22 2010 and my claim has just moved to descison then 4 days later went to Notification phase. so i call the 1800 number they told me my claim was rated on september 12 right. the next day yesterday i long on ebenefits and surprisingly it went back to the decesion phase. well i called them today they told me that my claim was sent back for corrections and was rated again on the 15. so i checked today and it was still in decision even though its already been rated. what im worried about is they going to deny me. its been 17 months now my unemployment is almost up heck i even sent a hardship packet in they got all the evidence so i need an opinion.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Welcome to Hadit.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Welcome Aboard

Psycotic what makes you think you might be denied?

One good thing for sure, is it didn't go back to developement stage!

JMO...I see your already 50% SC, which makes a very good standing combined with what has just been rated to be considered for a possible 100%, either schedular or TDIU. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that's what I think is going to happen cause I have no idea how strong your case is/was.

Now, I can tell you what I think could of happened. Since it was rated twice in a matter of 3 days tells me the correction was fast and easy for them to make me think, that when it was rated the first go around they noticed an error and then sent back to the rater for re-evaluation. Whether the outcome is goin to be good or not so good, who knows. But my opinion is your goin to be surprised. Again, this is only my opinion!! I'm wishing the max for ya. Good Luck


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

alright thank you cooter thanks for your reassurance. i just cant wait for i9t to be complete now i have read in another forum the sucess stories that you check the letter generato once it goes back to notification phase i hope will are maill sucks we dont get till about 5pm which sucks

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will only compensation the main MH disorder not both PTSD and psychosis.

They will probably be using the new PTSD criteria explained in this forum.

However if you had evidence of inservice psychosis ratable at least at 10% , then they will surely apply the chronic presumptive regs to that claim if it is the main MH disabilty you have.

The back and knee disorders will need an inservice nexus (link or cause).

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is NO accurate WAY to track claims status day by day,

week by week or month by month.

Doesn't matter if you use ebenefits - 1-800 or Iris.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines