Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Still No News

Rate this question


pkelly4576

Question

Still no news on my appealed claim that was remanded to the AMC. All I know that a decision was made on 9/15/2011. According to e-benefits my claims folder was sent back to the VA medical here in Philly. It also states on e-benefits, when I go under appealed claims that I have no appealed claims. When I called the 800 number they also told me that a decision was made on my claim and it is back in the Philly RO. They told me I should have received or will receive a notification letter soon.... that was 3 weeks ago. They are really slow. but I hope that they made the right decision on my claim which was originnaly filed in 1994 and 1995 for my IHD.

Coachchas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

//How long have you been waiting for your letter??? It is such a disgrace.. I talk to some people and they tell me oh I only waited 1 year. I know that the remand took long, but with the VA admitting that my IHD was service connected I thought it would be a couple of months. I happened to stop in the RO here in Philly on 9/16/2011, for other VA business the day after my claim was rated at the BVA. I noticed that my DAV person was there and I talked to him. He look my claim up and mention that it had just gotten to the Philly office. I think that they all say they same thing. He looked on his computer but did not give me much information. He said something about 60%, but then I mention SMC and he said well we may have to send in additional paperwork. Why couldn't he just tell me what the paperwork said. It is so frustrating when you deal with the VA even the DAV. The only persons who take my calls are Bruce from the AMC and Dean at the NVLSP. Everyone else thinks they are doing you a favor.

So Sorry Coachchas-YES I remembered you posted this stuff here some time ago-sorry I asked again- I have a lot going on in my life.

"I don't know where to look fo rthe information that you want me look at about loopholes"

I hope Chuck replies-I know what he means but often the loopholes are found in the C & P or in the SOC.

I dont think you should worry about that at all.

"I do know one thing, if I do not receive what I deserve. I will be right on the phone with Dean at the NVLSP." Just remember that NVLSP's main concern is the proper EED.If they make a wrong rating, we have to appeal that, or ask for reconsideration or tell them to go CUE themselves.

I am prepared to do all three if needed and anything else I can think of (maybe even go to the press this time) and/or give testimony to the H VAC again. There should not be a lot of erros in these claims ut as NVLSP said recently- tere have been EED errors in Footnote One Neher claims.

http://www.va.gov/

Go to this main page for the VA and then to the site index at the bottom of this page and then to Disability Compensation and then to Historic rate charts.

The dates of the rates are listed as of Dec but applicable to the following year.

In other words say they give 100% comp rating for 1V-1S-1C in Dec 2000,it means this is the amount of comp beginning in January 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My benefits states the same thing. My claim was remanded to the AMC and a decision was made back in July. The decision stated that my IHD was service connected, but they granted 0% until they received more information from my doctor and also a VA form for heart diease. I just hope that they get it right this time. The AMC, DAV, and NVLSP received all of my paperwork. I did not want to leave anything out. According to IRIS they stated that once it is received in the Appeals unit all paperwork will be completed. Who knows it is anyones guess.

Coachchas

PKelly

In a similar way, my ebenefits indicates a decision was mailed, as shown below. In my case, I think it means that my case was remanded, or would not have been "returned to the VAMC". I have also received no decision. There was a case, about a year ago that made the RO practice of requiring special signatures for a large retro illegal. (Yea...I know...the VA is "real worried" about compliance with the law...they think they are the law)

I would not say my claims potential for a retro is "large", but it is "large TO ME". By VA standards, they delay claims for 10 years often enough to have special procedures when they do. What does that tell you? To me, it says the VA is delaying claims more than a decade far, far too often.

You would think it would be a rare event, indeed that claims are delayed more than 10 years. Not so.

Details about your BVA Appeal received on no date

  • Power of Attorney: D - DAV
  • Current Progress: Decision & Claims File Dispatch
  • Current Progress Description: Your case has been received at BVA, and BVA has mailed your decision to you (and your representative, if any) and will be returning your claims file to the VA Medical Center. Please note that transit times vary, and there may be some lag time between when BVA forwards your claims file to its appropriate location and when that location receives it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use