Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Accrued Question?

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Someone,somewhere here mentioned accrued benefits recently- I cant find the post.

The 2 year accrued regulation was altered by Bonny V Principi.

Successful accrued claims are now awarded as ALL accrued if the veteran's death was after December 2003.

Bonny however was not retroactive. (meaning for deaths occurring prior to Dec 2003)

Nehmer awards ALL accrued that accumulates under the disability that now is an SC AO disability by virtue of a Nehmer AO award under the new regs- if all the nuances of Nehmer come into play with those claims.

This however will become (in my opinion) a very convoluted situation for widows and widowers of AO veterans whose Nehmer claims involve accrued benefits.

I am preparing information on that for our AO forum.

Some widows and widowers will have a retro EED that includes accrued but also they need to consider what amount the vet got in his or her lifetime as other compensation-which will impact on the Nehmer rtro.

Also dependency issues could have been different since the veteran's last denied claim in their lifetime- another ramification involving Nehmer retro.

Also the posthumous SMC factor hinges on these awards in many cases.

I will be focusing solely on AO, DIC, and FTCA issues for a while here-

As NVLSP stated recently they have made multiple EED errors in the Nehmer claims already and

since VA has a Oct 31,2011 deadline for these claims, (I dont expect them to honor)

I bet there will be more Nehmer SNAFUs to come.

Accrued awards in general-non Nehmer------ I also will update the info in our DIC forum on that too.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta, that was me. Nice to hear "you correcting me!" I wasn't aware of Bonny v Principi, or if I was, don't remember. Again, thanks for the correction!! This news will help my ex, when she loses her current spouse, who is on borrowed time now.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear of that vet Philip.

She can substitute herself as the claimant if he dies with a claim pending and that could generate potential accrued benefits.

She should also file for DIC if that has potential.

When a spouse substitutes themselves as the claimant for a deceased spouses pending claim- they still must go through the same rigamorale that veterans do, to prove the pending claim.

Under Nehmer the legal next of kin (as defined in the Nehmer regs) can step in and substitute themselves for the deceased Nehmer Survivor.

That is why NVLSP asks us for beneficiary info if we have contacted them via the AO email addy in our AO forum.

I gave them that info and also contact info for the lawyer here who prepared my will.

But the best thing I can do is to stay in good health-just for Spite!!!!!!

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks, Berta! She'll be eligible for the DIC, w/over 10 yrs, since he was 100% and they were married those 10 yrs. He has some pending stuff and my have some Nehmer issues, too. He doesn't have long and still smokes 3-4 packs a day. Of course at this point what's quitting gonna do for him, anyway. Sad, but were all gonna die. Best thing to do, now, is to try and live a long healthy life! jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use