Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Help In Finding Out Numbers Va Used To Compute Disability

Rate this question


JeffSoCal

Question

I am 90% service connected and reopened my case 12/7/10 because of disabilities getting worse.

I'm 40% Lumbar Strain

40% Phlebitus

40% right lower leg radiculopathy

20% left lower leg radiculopathy

10 % bilateral metarsalia

Using VA calculator I come up with raw score of 86 which equals 90%.

I have a two part question. Shouldn't my radiculopathy be rated bilaterally because of

same condition in both legs. My award letter says nothing about the 40% and 20% being

bilateral. If it was my raw score would be now 88 which is still 90% but is closer to 95.

Who would I contact to find out what raw score the VA used to compute my 90%. And if they made

a mistake and didn't rate it bilaterally should I notify them since my existing claim is still in

development stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Again, you are getting too involved in semantics and placing too much emphasis on the single written word "bilateral". FWIW, under the Diagnostic Code (DC) 7819-5279, you do not have a 10% for the right foot and 10% for the left foot - you have a single 10%, whether the condition is right, left, or bilateral.

As for phlebitus are you saying that its considered bilateral even though I have it in one leg? Yes. Here are examples of the possible bilateral situations:

1. NOT Bilateral: A veteran is service connected for right hip, right knee, right ankle, right shoulder, right elbow, right wrist and right thumb.

2. Bilateral computation done: The same situation as #1 (veteran is service connected for right hip, right knee, right ankle, right shoulder, right elbow, right wrist and right thumb ). However, the veteran also is service connected for a left great toe condition. In this situation, although there are NO service-connected conditions which exist on both sides of the body, the bilateral factor applies. The evaluations of ALL of these conditions - right hip, right knee, right ankle, right shoulder, right elbow, right wrist, right thumb and left great toe - are combined and then the bilateral factor is applied.

3. Bilateral computation done: The same situation as #1 (veteran is service connected for right right hip, right knee, right ankle, right shoulder, right elbow, right wrist and right thumb). The veteran also is service connected at a single 10% for DC 7819-5279 (sounds eerily familiar, doesn't it?). The bilateral factor applies, because both feet are affected, even though only one 10% is assigned.

The bottom line in my mentioning all this is I want to find out what my raw score is that my 90% was computed from. I laid that out to you in an earlier post. Before you do any more computations, you really need to read 38 CFR 4.25 and 38 CFR 4.26; here is a link http://www.benefits....warms/bookc.asp .

As for the statement from a urologist that urinary incontinence may be caused by sacral nerve compression., I suggest that you ask your urologist to re-write the statement to read: It is as likely as not that Mr. ______'s urinary incontinence is caused by sacral nerve compression. An even better statement would be: It is more likely than not that Mr. ______'s urinary incontinence is caused by sacral nerve compression. Note: the above statement does not necessarily mean that the sacral nerve compression would be service connected.

jvretiredvet: So sorry for confusing you. I hope I can clarify a couple of items. I really appreciate your input. I went back to my original award letter from 30 years ago and it says diagnostic code 7819-5279 bilateral plantar keratosis, metatarsalgia 10%. I filed for increase in 2008 because of phlebitus and back conditions got worse and received increase from 40% to 90%. Urinary incontinence was mentioned in my documentation that I filed in 2008 but not claimed by me. In my award letter the VA said that in order for it to be claimed I needed to submit urological dynamics test results to file for it. In my pending claim I have submitted such files along with statement from a urologist that urinary incontinence may be caused by sacral nerve compression. As for phlebitus are you saying that its considered bilateral even though I have it in one leg? The bottom line in my mentioning all this is I want to find out what my raw score is that my 90% was computed from. If the radiculopathy was not considered bilaterally then I should have a few more raw points which helps if I want to get to 95.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jvretiredvet: Thanks so much. I went back and reread about bilateral factor and a light bulb went off!!! I was under the impression that to get bilateral factor for each condition it had to exist in both R and L extremities. I re did my computation by adding 40% for phebitus, 40 for R radiculopathy, 20 for L radiculopathy and the 10 for feet to come up with 74. 10% of that 7.4 added gives me 81. Then combined 81 with 40% for back gives me a raw 89 score which equals 89. I didn't see your earlier post that showed this but really appreciate all the help in explaining it. I feel alot better now about achieving my goal. I'm 64 still working but as soon as my claim gets settled (VSO) says they should start moving on it in 2-3 weeks because of 1 year anniversary then I' ll schedule by back surgery. I've thougth about SDI but you've got to be out of work for 5 months before collecting any thing and by then I'll almost be full retirement age so haven't gained anything.

Edited by JeffSoCal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use