Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Links And Info Meb,peb,peblo

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I didnt know were to post this info here-

this is email from Colonel Dan Cedusky:

Good article on Medical Evaluations for discharge/Medical Retirements below

Army http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1991/48648/

VA.. http://www.vba.va.gov/predischarge/index.htm

Navy: http://www.donhq.navy.mil/corb/peb/pebmainpage1.htm

USAF: http://www.woundedwarrior.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090219-058.pdf

http://www.woundedwarrior.af.mil/

military overall

http://louisvillelaw.com/federal/physical_disability_sep_1.htm

Partial reprint

Overview.

A soldier may be separated from the United States Army for a physical or mental impairment, whether a disease or injury, if it renders the soldier physically unfit for duty. Fitness for duty is a function of the soldier’s ability to perform the duties of his or her primary military occupation specialty (PMOS) or offi cer specialty (OS) at a minimum level of competence given the soldier’s rank and current duty position.[1][3] The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)is the sole forum within the Army to determine a soldier’s unfitness for duty as a result of a physical impairment. Failure on the part of a soldier to be worldwide deployable by reason of a physical disability does not by itself render a soldier unfit for duty. The factual determination as to whether a soldier is fit or unfit for duty exclusively focuses upon duty performance. A soldier carrying multiple diagnoses may nonetheless be found fit for duty if there has been no significant diminution in the soldier’s duty performance. It is only when a physical disability has risen to the high level of interrupting the soldier’s service career, or term of service, that a PEB w ill make a factual finding of unfitness. To illustrate how this is so strongly a performance based system, it is not unusual to come upon the paradox wherein two soldiers of equal rank with identical medical conditions of equivalent severity, have contradictory fitness findings. This is where one soldier is found fit for duty and the other is not. This apparent contradiction in outcome is explained by the fact that one soldier can still perform the duties of his/her PMOS, while the other cannot. Consider the example of two PFCs, one a 11B5P airborne infantryman and the other a 71L administrative specialist, both of whom are afflicted with constant, moderate knee pain. This medical condition will render an infantryman unfit for duty given the demanding physical requirements of the Airborne Infantry, whereas the administrative specialist with only light physical requirements can still perform clerical duties at a minimum level of competence or higher, and will, therefore, be f ound fit within the limits of his/her physical profile.

The process for making a fit for duty determination begins with the medical evaluation board (MEBD).[2][4] A soldier may be referred to an MEB from a MOS/Medical Retention Board (MMRB) or by a reviewing or treating physician.[3][5] The results of the MEB are forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for adjudication. After adjudication, the PEB results are forwarded to the Physical Disability Agency (PDA) for review and final appr oval.[4][6] The PDA is a Department of the Army agency that has final approval authority for disability cases adjudicated by the PEB.

2. The Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD).

The treating physician, company/battery commander, or a convened Medical/MOS Retention Board (MMRB), each possess the authority to refer a soldier to a MEBD if separation for medical reasons is immediat ely foreseeable. The soldier’s servicing medical treatment facility (MTF) convenes a MEBD to document the soldier’s medical history, current physical status and recommended duty limitations. The soldier’s command prepares a memorandum on the commander’s position on the soldier’s physical abilities to perform PMOS/OS duties in the currently assigned duty position. The MEBD’s mission is to determine if the physically-impaired soldier meets retention standards in accordance with AR 40-501, Standards of Medical Fitness.[5][7] The PEB, however, is the sole determiner of the soldier’s physical fitness for duty, as measured by duty performance, in accordance to AR 635-40, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation.

The MEBD forwards the soldier’s case to the PEB for review if the MEBD finds that the soldier does not meet retention standards, according to PMOS/OS and grade, as prescribed by chapter 3, AR 40-501.[6][8] However, a soldier is not automatically unfit because of a failure to meet the retention standards. AR 635-40 precludes the doctors at the MEBD from making a factual determination as to the soldier’s physical fitness for duty. This fact-finding authority is solely within the purview of the PEB.[7][9] If the physician violates this pro hibition and renders a fitness assessment, it will simply be ignored by the PEB.

The MEBD findings are recorded on DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board Proceedings). This form documents the physical or mental conditions that preclude the soldier’s retention. If the soldier does not agree with the findings, he may so indicate on DA Form 3947 and attach a written appeal that sets forth the reasons he or she disagrees. If the Medical Treatment Facility’s (MTF) approving authority does not make a favorable change in the original MEBD based upon the soldier’s appeal, a copy of the soldier’s appeal will be sent to the PEB along with the results of the MEBD.

3. Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officers (PEBLO).

An important actor and source of information for soldiers throughout the PEB process is the PEBLO. The PEBLO collects and prepares the soldier’s medical packet for presentation to MEBD and PEB.[8][10] A soldier’s medical packet consists of medical records, medical narrative summary of present disabling conditions, commander’s memorandum and physical profile, along with other related i nformation.

Each MTF should have a designated PEBLO available to provide counseling for soldiers from the time they are identified as requiring a MEB through the time that they are separated. The PEBLO will work with the Soldier’s Legal Counsel and PEB to obtain required documentation and other medical information and will also serve as the point of contact between physicians and board members. The PEBLO is usually located in the Patient Affairs Division.”

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use