Survivors are often able to substitute themselves for the deceased claimant if the deceased veteran died with a claim in progress.
This is something any survivor should not overlook, particularly with so many service personnel who incurred injuries during the recent war and had a claim pending with VA, yet have died due to the complications of their service injuries.
The regs however, cover any surviving spouse and or appropriate claimant who could be legally substituted for the deceased veteran, regardless of the veteran's service period.
When the VBM went to print in 2011, NVLSP did not have the final regulations on substitution.
I believe this fast letter has already been posted at hadit before but the most recent version of the Substitution regs are in it-
It is on page 4, as to the new statute governing these types of claims.
Once the survivor applies for Substitution they then have to continue to develop the deceased veteran's claim for any potential accrued benefits.
ALL service officers and vet reps understand these regs and should all have the proper Substitution form which is also here at hadit and also at the VA web site under forms.
Form # 21-0847
Once received and accepted by VA the form only covers the legal requirement of substitution.
The burden of proof falls onto the new claimant ,to prove the veteran's pending claims issues.
The new claimant should obtain the veteran's C file and VA medical records as soon as they can and dig out the last letters the veteran received from the VA as well as the veteran's original VCAA letter, as these documents hold the keys to what the new claimant needs to hopefully succeed in an award for “accrued benefits”which has been discussed here at hadit for years----info
available under a hadit search.
A surviving claimant in some cases, might not be eligible for DIC or a war time death pension but could still be eligible for accrued benefits.
For example say a veteran died due to a completely un-service connectable cause.
But say the veteran had a PTSD claim pending at death.
There would be potential for the surviving spouse to substitute themselves and follow that claim through to a potential accrued award if they could not garner DIC or a death pension from VA.
In my case- they awarded for accrued PTSD comp. but continued to classify my husband's death as NSC. They subsequently awarded DIC 6 months later under 1151 and then the BVA awarded direct SC death in 2010.
These claims were separate issues however from the accrued claim and every other claim had to be supported separately with evidence.
I received accrued long before the substitution regs became available.
The claim criteria however is the same regarding any potential accrued claim.
I used manila folders specifically for the evidence and documents to prove my husband's 30% SC for PTSD on appeal when he died, should have been 100% or TDIU.
My accrued award claim took less then 3 years.
I kept the 1151, FTCA and direct SC death AO issues and folders separate from the accrued benefits claim.
When the 1151 and FTCA issues were resolved, I put those files away but needed some of them for my 2004 SMC CUE claim, which was another "accrued " award , under 1151, awarded this past January.
So it pays to keep EVERYTHING from the VA.
Accrued benefit claims that are non Nehmer 2010 ,
MUST be filed for within one year of the veteran's death.
DIC claims MUST be filed within one year of the veterans death-if the surviving wants to attain the date of death as the EED. Otherwise VA will use the date of the formal DIC claim.
There are no exceptions to the above 2 statements unless the claim falls under Nehmer and meets the Nehmer criteria specific to the AO disability.
Question
Berta
Survivors are often able to substitute themselves for the deceased claimant if the deceased veteran died with a claim in progress.
This is something any survivor should not overlook, particularly with so many service personnel who incurred injuries during the recent war and had a claim pending with VA, yet have died due to the complications of their service injuries.
The regs however, cover any surviving spouse and or appropriate claimant who could be legally substituted for the deceased veteran, regardless of the veteran's service period.
When the VBM went to print in 2011, NVLSP did not have the final regulations on substitution.
I believe this fast letter has already been posted at hadit before but the most recent version of the Substitution regs are in it-
http://www.scribd.co...-Claimant-09-15
VA Fast Letter # 09-15
It is on page 4, as to the new statute governing these types of claims.
Once the survivor applies for Substitution they then have to continue to develop the deceased veteran's claim for any potential accrued benefits.
ALL service officers and vet reps understand these regs and should all have the proper Substitution form which is also here at hadit and also at the VA web site under forms.
Form # 21-0847
Once received and accepted by VA the form only covers the legal requirement of substitution.
The burden of proof falls onto the new claimant ,to prove the veteran's pending claims issues.
The new claimant should obtain the veteran's C file and VA medical records as soon as they can and dig out the last letters the veteran received from the VA as well as the veteran's original VCAA letter, as these documents hold the keys to what the new claimant needs to hopefully succeed in an award for “accrued benefits”which has been discussed here at hadit for years----info
available under a hadit search.
A surviving claimant in some cases, might not be eligible for DIC or a war time death pension but could still be eligible for accrued benefits.
For example say a veteran died due to a completely un-service connectable cause.
But say the veteran had a PTSD claim pending at death.
There would be potential for the surviving spouse to substitute themselves and follow that claim through to a potential accrued award if they could not garner DIC or a death pension from VA.
In my case- they awarded for accrued PTSD comp. but continued to classify my husband's death as NSC. They subsequently awarded DIC 6 months later under 1151 and then the BVA awarded direct SC death in 2010.
These claims were separate issues however from the accrued claim and every other claim had to be supported separately with evidence.
I received accrued long before the substitution regs became available.
The claim criteria however is the same regarding any potential accrued claim.
I used manila folders specifically for the evidence and documents to prove my husband's 30% SC for PTSD on appeal when he died, should have been 100% or TDIU.
My accrued award claim took less then 3 years.
I kept the 1151, FTCA and direct SC death AO issues and folders separate from the accrued benefits claim.
When the 1151 and FTCA issues were resolved, I put those files away but needed some of them for my 2004 SMC CUE claim, which was another "accrued " award , under 1151, awarded this past January.
So it pays to keep EVERYTHING from the VA.
Accrued benefit claims that are non Nehmer 2010 ,
MUST be filed for within one year of the veteran's death.
DIC claims MUST be filed within one year of the veterans death-if the surviving wants to attain the date of death as the EED. Otherwise VA will use the date of the formal DIC claim.
There are no exceptions to the above 2 statements unless the claim falls under Nehmer and meets the Nehmer criteria specific to the AO disability.
Edited by BertaLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
1
1
1
Popular Days
May 8
3
May 3
1
May 4
1
May 10
1
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 3 posts
Pete53 1 post
red 1 post
Philip Rogers 1 post
Popular Days
May 8 2012
3 posts
May 3 2012
1 post
May 4 2012
1 post
May 10 2012
1 post
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now