mojo13 Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 A friend just called me and said that the VA is now approving claims for sleep apnia due to PTSD??? this was told to him by his attorney, does any one hear of this ????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlie Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 here are some article for you to show your doctor to help you in your nexus letter. http://www.chestnet....p-and-breathing Here is a case that it as done in. http://www.va.gov/ve...s01/0102100.txt As I posted earlier, VA grants claims on medical evidence. I believe the attorney referred to by the OP, just kind of made a generalized / blanket statement that by itself, is not supported by any USC laws or 38 CFR regs. This could clearly and easily lead to belief of an untruth. "He has ptsd and waqs denieed sleep apnia and gotim self a lawyer she called him told him they are approving sa for vets secondary to ptsd who have shown symptoms and use a cpap." Just so the OP can see what I'm talking about Im going to use this BVA case you posted the link to. It's a good case to use for example. "Citation Nr: 0102100 Decision Date: 01/25/01 Archive Date: 01/31/01 DOCKET NO. 99-22 315 ) DATE On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Louis, Missouri THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea as secondary to service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Richard A. Cohn, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from April 1970 to December 1971. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an August 1999 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office in St. Louis, Missouri (RO) which denied service connection for sleep apnea as secondary to service-connected PTSD. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The record includes all evidence necessary for the equitable disposition of this appeal. 2. There is competent medical evidence linking current sleep apnea to the veteran's service-connected PTSD. CONCLUSION OF LAW The veteran's sleep apnea was aggravated by his service- connected PTSD. Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096 (2000); 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107, 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2000). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The veteran attributes sleep apnea to his service-connected PTSD. The veteran does not contend that he incurred or aggravated sleep apnea during service and there is no evidence of sleep apnea or other sleep disorder in the veteran's service medical records SMRs. Procedurally, this appeal is developed fully and ready for Board adjudication. The RO has verified the veteran's period of service; there is no issue as to the substantial completeness of the veteran's application for VA benefits; the veteran has undergone VA examination pursuant to the application; the RO has requested and associated with the claims file all available service and postservice medical records pertinent to this appeal; VA is unaware of other unrequested records pertinent to this appeal, and; the evidence is sufficient to permit the Board to proceed with appellate review. See Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-475, 114 Stat. 2096, (2000). A veteran may be entitled to service connection for a disability under either a direct or secondary analysis. Direct service connection is warranted for disability resulting from disease or injury incurred or aggravated in service. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 1131 (West 1991); 38 C.F.R. § 3.303 (2000). Secondary service connection is warranted both for a disability caused by a service-connected disorder and for a disability aggravated by a service-connected disorder. 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2000). In the latter case, compensation is limited to the extent to which the service- connected disorder increased the severity of the secondary disorder. Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995); Jones (Wayne) v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 134, 136-37 (1994). A service- connected secondary disorder becomes part of the original disorder. 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a). The veteran is a decorated former Army combat soldier whose PTSD has been service-connected since July 1995. SMRs include no evidence of a sleep disorder in service and the veteran claims none. VA medical records confirm that the veteran underwent sleep studies in February and October 1998 from which he was diagnosed with sleep apnea. A VA psychiatric progress note from February 1999 briefly reviewed the studies' findings and applicable research and concluded that PTSD and its treatment "in all probability has aggravated the obstructive sleep apnea." The note further states that "it is certainly as likely as not that this veteran's sleep apnea is directly related to his PTSD." The VA physician who examined the veteran in July 1999 identified two likely causes of his sleep apnea: enlarged tonsillar tissue and obesity. The physician found no etiological connection between PTSD and enlarged tonsillar tissue. However, he acknowledged that "an argument could be made" linking the veteran's obesity with PTSD although the veteran's medical records did not include another medical opinion to that effect. In the Board's judgment the record presents adequate evidence upon which to base a finding that the veteran's PTSD aggravated his sleep apnea. The opinion expressed in the February 1999 progress note is neither ambiguous nor equivocal on that point. The July 1999 examination report is more tentative -- finding only a medical possibility of attenuated causality under a different rationale. Nevertheless, the July 1999 opinion does not refute the February 1999 opinion, and it is well established that VA itself may not refute expert medical conclusions in the record with its own unsubstantiated medical conclusions. Colvin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 171, 175. (1991). Therefore, absent medical evidence actually denying a causal linkage between PTSD and sleep apnea in this case, the Board reads the two opinions together as providing, at minimum, evidentiary equipoise which must be resolved in the veteran's favor. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(b). Accordingly, the Board is constrained to find that service connection for sleep apnea is warranted here under a secondary analysis. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.310. ORDER Service connection for sleep apnea is granted secondary to service-connected PTSD. WARREN W. RICE, JR. Member, Board of Veterans' Appeals" TO MOJO, Had this veteran NOT had medical evidence in the opinions,that connected his SA secondary to his PTSD, the claim would not warrant service connection. Example:Vet is SC'd for PTSD.Vet has a sleep study and is diagnosed with SA and RX'd a CPAP.If there is no medical evidence of record that connects the SA to the PTSDeither one of two things will happen.1) The claim for SA will be denied and the vet has the avenue to NOD/Appeal.2) The VA decision maker will request a C&P be scheduled to determine themedical cause of the veterans SA.If the examiner opines that the SA is not related or a result of the veteransPTSD, the issue will remain denied. The veteran would need to obtain medical evidence to the contrary that connects.the two conditionsThis would at least garner application of the BOD, to get the issue granted.The simple% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator broncovet Posted May 11, 2012 Moderator Share Posted May 11, 2012 Correct, OSA can be SC provided you have the nexus. The Veteran in the case Carlie cited met all 3 Hickson elements: 1. He had a current diagnosis of OSA. 2. He had documented PTSD (service connected) 3. He had a "nexus" statement from his doc linking the two. In my experience the hard part is getting a VA doc to provide this nexus. The rest is mostly waiting, appealing and persistence. PTSD and sleep apnea are no different than the other maladies. If the doc says they are connected, then the Va will be hard pressed to try to refute what the doc says. It is all about the medical evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojo13 Posted May 11, 2012 Author Share Posted May 11, 2012 Thank you all so much for your comments, I will keep you informed. The lawyer still saids its a new thing that they are giving those ptsd case who meet the requirments of Sleep apnia, who knows but again thanks and you guys are the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gulfvet45 Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 you still need to get a nexus from your doctor to get it as a secondary. that is what we are all telling you. with out it you will not win. get the study that the article is talking about and show it to your doctor and get your letter. send that letter and the study in with your claim. then maybe you will win. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/28/us-sleep-ptsd-idUSTRE79R35S20111028 Thank you all so much for your comments, I will keep you informed. The lawyer still saids its a new thing that they are giving those ptsd case who meet the requirments of Sleep apnia, who knows but again thanks and you guys are the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojo13 Posted May 15, 2012 Author Share Posted May 15, 2012 Thanks gulfvet he has the letter from VA docter, sleep study results, and 2 articles. He is 30% ptsd and 2 PH, lets see what happens will let you guys know. Thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
militarynurse Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 PTSD and obesity linked - BVA decision: http://www.va.gov/vetapp00/files2/0010958.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
mojo13
A friend just called me and said that the VA is now approving claims for sleep apnia due to PTSD??? this was told to him by his attorney, does any one hear of this ?????
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
2
2
Popular Days
May 10
7
May 11
3
May 15
2
Jun 24
1
Top Posters For This Question
mojo13 4 posts
carlie 2 posts
broncovet 2 posts
Gulfvet45 2 posts
Popular Days
May 10 2012
7 posts
May 11 2012
3 posts
May 15 2012
2 posts
Jun 24 2013
1 post
13 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now