Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Allergic Rhinitis Reasonal For Denying Claim

Rate this question


Scott D

Question

I was recently going back through some paperwork adn noticed that the reason the VA had denied Service Connection for Allergic Rhinitis is listed below. This doesn't really make sense to me now and I am not sure why I didn't appeal the origianl decision. It is a few years old now. There decision seems to be based on alot of assumption. Here's some cites from my SMR. Is there anything I can do to try adn get this SC'd?

1. Health Surveillance form dated 16 Jun 03 Where allergies, asthma etc… was checked.

2. SMR page dated 09 Jul 2003 Patient presenting food allergy to fruit/vegetables with throat closing (cucumber, melon, orange, bananas, and tomatoes). Possible food allergies refer to allergy clinic.

-I had an appointment at the allergy clinic located at Madigan Hospital. During this visit skin prick testing was only accomplished for allergens like dust, grass, mold, trees etc… The medical staff did provide guidance that avoidance to the foods that causes allergy symptoms is required and the only option to treat food allergies.

3. Printout of medication which shows multiple prescriptions for Flonase and Allegra to treat allergic rhinitis, and a prescription for an EPI-Pen used to treat anaphylaxis caused by food allergy.

4. SMR page dated 10 nov 2004 showing allergies

5. SMR page dated 04 JAN 2005 documenting Allegra and flonase use and allergies.

5. SMR page 01 FEB 2005 documenting a history of allergies

6. SMR page dated 07 Feb 2005 documenting allergies with Allegra and Claritin

Treatment records in c-file further document food allergy testing, and allergic rhinitis with polyps.

3. Service connection for allergic rhinitis.

Allergic conditions are considered acute and transitory conditions. Seasonal and other acute allergic manifestations typically subside in the absence, or removal, of the stimulating allergen and resolve without residual disability. Therefore, service connection for all ergic rhinitis is denied since this condition is considered acute and transitory in nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

What they are saying is that your allergies are only present when the substance that you are allergic to is present. Therefore, if you are allergic to dogs, but the C&P examiner doesn't have a service animal sitting beside him, or dog residue all over his office, you exhibit no symptoms. If you exhibit no symptoms, then there is nothing to rate. SInce you are allergic to certain foods, it is a given that you will stay away from those foods, which again means you exhibit no symptoms. The Allegra/Claratin Rx's lead me to believe you have seasonal allergies as well. A very large number of the population has this, and the symptoms go away one the stimuli has finished blooming (aka "transitory"), therefore they will not rate it. Now, if you have a deviated septum from a broken nose while you were on active duty, or as a secondary to a service connected disability (say from a fall), and that condition caused the rhinitis, then it would be much more possible to get it rated. Sorry.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the testing I did in the Navy I tested positive for reactions to weeds, grasses, trees, cats, mold, and dust mites. My symptoms are present year round and triggers like dust and are present year round. A few months after separation my Doctor notes, the patient is in for follow up for perennial allergic rhinitis with seasonal worsening, asthma, eosinophillic esophagitis, and food allergy. Nasal blockage and polyps were determined to be present via physical examination and nasal smear. Below is rating criteria for allergic rhinitis. I am still curious (not shocked) as to how they can deny a claim based off the assumed transitory nature of the symptoms. The food allergy is a separate issue as is asthma that has both been denied as well.

Is there a way to reopen the claim?

I appreciate the response and assistance. Sometimes a reality check is needed to ensure that I am not way off base and that i'm not on a wild goose chase.

6522 Allergic or vasomotor rhinitis:

With polyps ......................................................................................................... 30

Without polyps, but with greater than 50-percent obstruction of nasal

passage on both sides or complete obstruction on one side................................ 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A few months after separation my Doctor notes, the patient is in for follow up for perennial allergic rhinitis with seasonal worsening, asthma, eosinophillic esophagitis, and food allergy. Nasal blockage and polyps were determined to be present via physical examination and nasal smear.

Depending on what the C&P report says (supposing they actually did one) I'm 100% with PR on this. Take this SMR, highlite it, circle it, underline it, and mail it to them with a big fat CUE claim. Also send their own rating criteria back to them with the 30% criteria highlited and tell them to learn how to read.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Scott D,

As you can see on one hand they tell you allergic rhinitis cannot be rated and on the other hand there is a rating for the condition in the schedule.

It is easier to get seasonal allergies rated than it is food allergies. This is due to the fact that you can do an elimination diet and avoid food. other allergies are not nesessarily seasonal. Getting the condition service connected would need to show that you have no control over the allergic condition while functioning normally. I have seen cases where seasonal allergies were awarded because the symptoms were very chronic and out of control. There are numerous allergic conditions that are not seasonal. It also works if you can get a report that shows that your current allergic condition is chronic and not controllable due to the fact that the allergen(s) has not been specifically identified, isolated and removed from your environment.

This would be the type of new evidence that would re-open your claim. Keep in mind the frequency and severity of events shown in the rating schedule and see a doctor and have the doctor note the objective symptoms of allergy when you are seen by the doctor. Frequency and severity supported solely by your subjective complaints will not be given weight.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I think everyone knows that most SMRs are generally vague and do not go into much detail. As far as my record goes there are approaxamately 15 references to allergies or prescriptions, or testing. Wouldn't this at least warranted a service connection at zero percent?

After service, by a few months, I started getting treatment for perennial rhinitis with worsening seasonal conditions.

As far as he food allergy claim goes, I tested positive for allergies to 46 different foods. I was placed on a restriction diet that was impossible to follow. The only food I was abl to eat was beef, chicken turkey, dairy, and barley. This made it to difficult to follow. The problem with the food allergy in that my service connected eosinophilia esophagitis is excaberated by eating the foods that I have tested positive to. This cause a stricture,vomiting, reflux, inability to swallow etc... The whole mess is interrelated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use