Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Erectile Dysfunction

Rate this question


meghp0405

Question

hello all, I'm seeking some advice for a veteran that visited me today. Here is his story;

rated 100% P & T scheduler 15 years ago.

prescribed many prescriptions over the years that have a side effect of ED

has chronic low back pain. doctor prescribed fentanyl patch approx. 7 years ago. started at 25 mg, moved up to 50mg and now is at 75mg. All dealing with the chronic pain in his back.

he spoke to his va doc about 6 years ago concerning ED. Doc prescribed Viagra. vet states that by taking Viagra, it only intensified and prolonged his migraines. He is service connected 50% for migraines and stopped taking the drug. has not spoke to the doc since because "it's an uncomfortable topic with his female doc"

he wants to file a claim for SMC K, but is unsure. Only one annotation of ED in his records. He also believes that by doing so will open his claim in it's entirety. he only has 5 years to go before his current rating can never be touched again.

We use to be told during our training that when submitting a claim, it opens a claim in it's entirety. I used to believe that, but now I don't. I just don't believe that the VA has time to go through each and every claim looking at each disability. And to add, the rating decisions that I have reviewed just pertained to the disability that was requested for an increase.

I believe based upon everything he said, (which correlated) with medical records, a claim of ED would have a favorable outcome.

Any advice? Your thoughts and comments would be greatly appreciated!

meg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I would not file a claim. The stories are endless about the errors the VA can do. Its sad that we should fear the VA rating monster, but in reality, its a very scary (and unaccountable) monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would definitely file the claim. As for the female doctor, tell him to "man up" it's nothing to be ashamed of. It's just nature. Must still be somewhat immature(to me). I recently asked my female dr for Viagra, no big deal. The VA can look at all his conditions and if he's a fraud, I wouldn't ask for anything, but if his conditions are real there is nothing to be afraid of. I believe anyone who'd tell him not to apply is on the VA's side. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ouch! I am far from being on the VA's side. I just went through a mysterious letter from VA Collections. It said since my compensation has changed, I owe them $2889. To this day, I have not gotten a response from regional as to why this debt was generated. Collections also agrees there is no letter from them as to why, only a debt, and they are to collect it. I've contacted, spoken to and written a letter and a state rep looking into it.

After the panic attacks it caused, out of no where, the exact amount gets deposited into my account. the money is going back, eventually. But I stil have no response as to why, but I was told by multiple contacts with the State rep and 1-800-never-the-same-answer, that there is no showing of my rating or any action in reducing me has taken place.

I',m just saying, sometimes you may be better off picking your battles, maybe not. But the VA operates freely to screw things up with no consequences. Flat out unmistakable errors take months if not years to get corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use