Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dm Ii And Vascular Disease

Rate this question


harleyman

Question

Does anyone have referenes or experience in getting vascular disease of the lower limbs service connected as secondary to DM II?

Veteran is s/c for DMII and PN with loss of use of one of the lower extremity ( 2 K awards one for loss and the other for ED),and also s/c for IHD. But recent claim for DVT (blood clot and infection in lower leg secondary to DMII ,VA has denied stating the leg condition is not related to the DMII.

Might the veteran get the DVT (clot and or infection)s/c as secondary to IHD?

Thanks!

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

"27 cm long 8 cm wide and 5 cm deep. It went from his ankle to above the knee into the thigh. How could that VA doctor not want to do further testing. This is absurd. This was only the first of 3 surgeries. He ended up with a knee surgery from above the knee down over the knee cap and to the patella. about a 6 or 7 inch scar. The another surgery for I&D on the calf which is still mending even now. This scar is about 8" ilong and was 5 inches deep. Still is indented by about an in, this is nasty and the area is painful and very hard, like a board still. He also had an upper thigh asperation of infection fluid done by the radilogist after the seconda surgery."

I wonder how much muscle tissue they had to remove in these surgeries.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harley,

This almost sounds like a case for News Coverage. The lack of treatment was bad enough, but after almost killing him - they have the NERVE to deny him coverage --

I wish these VA examiners would have to be accountable for the crap they write. If a licensing board ever read some of their opinions, they should certainly decide they are no competent to practice medicine.

The C&P examiner was the idiot - yet he wrote the report to make it look like the veteran was not credible. He couldn't have reviewed much medical literature to make a remark that diabetes was not a risk factor for any type of infection -- especially lower limb infections.

My gosh! Even lay people know that diabetics have increased risk for infections. That is why they sell diabetic socks, diabetic shoes, instruct diabetics on proper skin care, etc.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harley,

This almost sounds like a case for News Coverage. The lack of treatment was bad enough, but after almost killing him - they have the NERVE to deny him coverage --

I wish these VA examiners would have to be accountable for the crap they write. If a licensing board ever read some of their opinions, they should certainly decide they are no competent to practice medicine.

The C&P examiner was the idiot - yet he wrote the report to make it look like the veteran was not credible. He couldn't have reviewed much medical literature to make a remark that diabetes was not a risk factor for any type of infection -- especially lower limb infections.

My gosh! Even lay people know that diabetics have increased risk for infections. That is why they sell diabetic socks, diabetic shoes, instruct diabetics on proper skin care, etc.

I am beginning to think the veteran claimed the wrong condition. The veteran claimed peripheral vascular disease when maybe he should have claimed "residuals of diabetic infection resulting in vascular blockage and muscle weakness due to surgical debridement X 3 and and 1151 claim for misdagnosis by VA for same. Maybe the best way to proceed on this is to just file a new claim and include a DBQ completed by the PRIVATE doc's for vascular residuals of Diabetes infection also know as cellulitius with amubulatory residuals AND loss of ambulation of left lower extremity requiring power chair and cane. . File for SAH/.SHA for wheel chair access. I think I am starting to get a grip on this on. Thanks for your help sometmes it takes a village.-H

Edited by harleyman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like cellulitis is pretty easy to diagnose (i.e. even a VA doctor could do it).

The symptoms are redness of the skin, where it is hot and painful to touch.

The average doctor should be able to look at it and pretty well know.

They confirm their suspicion with a blood test.

The fact that the veteran improved when he was on antibiotics and got worse when he was off of them should have set up a red flag that they were dealing with an INFECTION!

Untreated, it spreads -- and can even enter the blood stream and lymph system.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe we could set up a site on http://www.gofundme.com/ to raise money for his IMOs. And tell his story about how he walked into the VA and now is riding in a wheelchair - but needs to raise money to pay for a private doctor to examine him because the VA doctors don't know that diabetics are at risk for infections.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use