Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Helpless Child


free_spirit_etc

Question

I am not sure my son will qualify as a Helpless Child for DIC. He was incapable of self-support prior to reaching age 18. And he was adopted by my husband. But based on my reading of the law, I am not sure my son is qualified. – however, I have kept his claim alive because I wasn’t 100% certain, and I didn’t want to give up his right to anything he might be entitled to.

So I am wondering what to do at this point. I am thinking I should withdraw the appeal.

I was going to ask the judge – but getting the VSO kind of ruined being able to ask the judge things. I did specifically ask the VSO, but just like with all the other issues, he didn’t really listen to what I said – He just told me that benefits were based on dependency – and I would need to provide the adoption papers. It is odd, but the only thing the RO required was a copy of the Birth Certificate showing my husband’s name as my son’s legal father.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

Of course, I dont know your child. However, if you are fairly certain your child does not meet the criteria, then I would not waste VA's limited resources and drop the claim. Just make sure before you drop the claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks brocovet! I have read those laws so many times, and always got tangled up in the "subject to the provisions of" clauses. It didn't look like he was eligible, but I kept pursuing the claim in the event I was missing something. Pursuing it was just sending in his claim and proof of disability - and then appealing when they said he wasn't eligible because my husband wasn't service connected.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that is a good point pr. There don't seem to be many cases on adopted children at the BVA. Most of them are cases for people raising grandchildren that they haven't legally adopted who are seeking equitable relief.

I was actually surprised to have the topic come up at my hearing because they didn't send the correct information for the notification letter for child's benefits. So they sent another letter later telling me they had left some things off and that I had more time to reply. So I have been separate SOCs on the helpless child issue and have had to file separate appeals. I haven't actually received notice that the helpless child issue was set for a hearing. But the judge did ask questions about my son and said he had a Form 9 for it. But the appeal on this claim was running a year behind my own DIC claim - so I was surprised it even came up at this hearing.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hesitate sometimes to post links to the regs or to VA Case Law here at hadit ...because they can become overwhelming.

M21-1MR Helpless Child regulations:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benefits.va.gov%2Fwarms%2Fdocs%2Fadmin21%2Fm21_1%2Fmr%2Fpart3%2Fsubptiii%2Fch07%2Fch07.doc&ei=MHgwUuCiFOfR2wXLmYDoBQ&usg=AFQjCNEniieNhWPhLppO88Y1U201oTQgbg&bvm=bv.51773540,d.b2I

M21-1MR, Part III, Subpart iii, Chapter 7

The truth is however, many of us would be in the crapper if we didn't take the time to fully assess whatever applied to our claims in either M21-1MR or 38 CFR ...........(I use both)

because these regulations often allude the VA...to our detriment.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use