Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Earlier Effective Date?

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

Speaking of making sure you address every issue with the BVA, as you cannot add evidence or argument between the BVA and CVA -

If the BVA grants service connection, but you don't agree with the effective date - do you file a claim for an earlier effective date with the RO and then work up through the system again - Or do you have to appeal that issue directly with the CVA.

I would tend to think it might be best to get SC first, and then worry about the effective date. But if the next step would have be the CVA, and not back at the RO, that might change things.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

"I would tend to think it might be best to get SC first, and then worry about the effective date"

That is the most important goal of any claim. It isn't 'best ' to get ...it is Mandatory to get.. Get SC first.

Get SC and then work from that and keep going any other potential issues that directly involve the SC, in process.

Such as accrued, potential secondarys etc etc .............

Free spirit we have considerable info via our main page here on the claims process ,from A to Z.

We have the whole 9 yards from VARO to BVA to CAVC to even the Federal Circuit court.

The answers to many of your questions are here. I use Goggle instead of our hadit search feature, and I google what I need (say Nehmer accrued) and then add hadit.com after the search words. Plenty will pop up.

If the VA awards your DIC claim, and if there were pending claims when your husband died, and you have a valid accrued claim in process or in appellate status , the DIC award will possibly impact on your pending accrued claim.

Possibly. Hard to say.

2 of my DIC awards had nothing to do with my initial accrued claim.

Accrued claim for PTSD SC. 100% P & T filed Jan 1995 awarded June 1997.

Third DIC award:

CUE for SMC accrued under 1151 filed 2004,ten years after the veterans death.

The 1151 100% accrued award had nothing to do with the Nehmer AO death award (2012)or the DMII death award.(2009)

It did have to do with the 1998 DIC award.

That is why I say 'possibly.' a DIC award in your case could affect your pending claim for accrued benefits.

If you have a valid pending accrued claim.

In another recent post somewhere at hadit today you asked something as to how to determine if your husband had any claims pending at death.

If you have an accrued claim pending ,I think you would know that answer.

Survivors can only support with evidence the claims the veteran themselves had pending at death with the VA.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I would tend to think it might be best to get SC first, and then worry about the effective date"

That is the most important goal of any claim. It isn't 'best ' to get ...it is Mandatory to get.. Get SC first.

Get SC and then work from that and keep going any other potential issues that directly involve the SC, in process.

Such as accrued, potential secondarys etc etc .............

Ah good! That eases my mind a lot! And makes my life at this point MUCH easier!

I have already brought up that there are possible other issues for accrued benefits besides the cancer. So they are "before the Board" somewhat. But I haven't really developed them - and would really prefer not to muddy the water, so to speak, while the BVA is considering my DIC claim.

As my husband's discharge physical is not in his file, I am wondering if I can ask the BVA to defer the issue on accrued benefits for other conditions, and remand to the RO to assist me in trying to get a copy of his discharge physical before deciding any of those claims.

I requested the RO to look for the discharge physical and they said they couldn't find it. I also requested it from the BVA - and they said it is not associated with his file. After reviewing the records, I don't think it was in the file when they decided ANY of his claims. So to give me more time to work on the other issues, and to keep from complicating the claim at this point when I am trying to get DIC, I am wondering if I could just request that the Board remand the claim to the RO in regard to other potential entitlements for accrued benefits besides the cancer - as the RO has not explored whether there were any other potential pending claims in the first instance, and as the discharge physical is not part of the record, but the VA has not exhausted their remedies to locate it under the duty to assist.

Free spirit we have considerable info via our main page here on the claims process ,from A to Z.

We have the whole 9 yards from VARO to BVA to CAVC to even the Federal Circuit court.

Thanks! I will look through that!

The answers to many of your questions are here. I use Goggle instead of our hadit search feature, and I google what I need (say Nehmer accrued) and then add hadit.com after the search words. Plenty will pop up.

I do that too! I even do that to find some of my own older posts. LOL And believe me - I am not just sitting here asking questions instead of researching myself. I research and research and research! That is pretty much my life right now.

If the VA awards your DIC claim, and if there were pending claims when your husband died, and you have a valid accrued claim in process or in appellate status , the DIC award will possibly impact on your pending accrued claim.

Yes. The main pending claim for accrued benefits was my husband's pending claim for his cancer. So getting DIC for that would make it more likely that the accrued benefits claim would be granted (as long as the VA decides there was enough evidence in his file on the date of his death to grant the claim).

Possibly. Hard to say.

2 of my DIC awards had nothing to do with my initial accrued claim.

Accrued claim for PTSD SC. 100% P & T filed Jan 1995 awarded June 1997.

Third DIC award:

CUE for SMC accrued under 1151 filed 2004,ten years after the veterans death.

I am wondering if I should ask for this at this point. But I think it would only be for about a month, on the housebound issue.

The 1151 100% accrued award had nothing to do with the Nehmer AO death award (2012)or the DMII death award.(2009)

It did have to do with the 1998 DIC award.

That is why I say 'possibly.' a DIC award in your case could affect your pending claim for accrued benefits.If you have a pending accrued claim.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah! You both a wonderful!!!!

BUT -- can I ask for a remand on the other (non-cancer) issues - to kick them down the road a bit without losing the right to them?

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Keep it in perspective:

To appeal a RO decision, you file a NOD and specify either DRO review or BVA.

To appeal a BVA decsion, you file a NOA and appeal to the Court of Veterans Claims.

This applies to whether you are appealing the effective date, service connection, disabilty percentage, etc.

You wont get an "effective date" until you have been granted a disability rating and percentage, at the RO level. So, if you dispute the RO's effective date, you appeal it at either the DRO review or BVA. If you lose at the BVA level, you can appeal your Board decision to the Court of Veterans Claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broncovet,

Thanks!

I am at the BVA level.

So do you mean that if I am granted DIC, and accrued benefits for my husband's cancer by the BVA - it will go back to the RO to decide the effective date?

AND - I have already brought up to the Board that the RO mentioned accrued benefits for cancer, but did not address whether there were other pending issues in the claim (such as other respiratory illnesses, increased ratings for his SC conditions, etc.)

So if the BVA says there are no other pending claims - that means I would need to be ready to take it to the CVA or drop it. I would prefer to have those kicked back to the RO at the moment.

So again - I am still trying to answer the question "So to give me more time to work on the other issues, and to keep from complicating the claim at this point when I am trying to get DIC, I am wondering if I could just request that the Board remand the claim to the RO in regard to other potential entitlements for accrued benefits besides the cancer - as the RO has not explored whether there were any other potential pending claims in the first instance, and as the discharge physical is not part of the record, but the VA has not exhausted their remedies to locate it under the duty to assist."

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use