Jump to content

Sponsored Ads

  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0

Cue Stalled Now What ?


I filed a CUE after rating of 30 % for IHD presumptive for Thailand with AICD . AICD was not rated in my claim. ( NOD from 2011). Claim should have been rated at 100%.

DAV agrees it was rated incorrectly

DAV and RO had me race to get a updated DBQ from my cardiologist last week which they got on Tuesday and it was hand carried to the supervisor of the DRO area by DAV. They said needed to hurry and get this addressed since claim had just closed it would be easy to " rework" it.

That all sounded good to me at time but now it is dead silence from DAV and VA.

Cue is posted on E Benefits to be resolved 7/2014.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

I don't think hurry to the VA means the same things as hurry does to normal people. The July 2014 is probably just what got programmed in, but isn't a real date. I would expect that they will get it resolved much quicker than that.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


when you see dates on the e-benefit site, those dates are all internal dates for the VA. When they pass the given date , they simply add another date. Please, don't get wrapped around the handle on these dates. It does nothing but causes undue, additional stress to an already oblivious situation.

The overall % will be determined on your ejection fraction test results. Do you remember what your results were?

Edited by meghp0405

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.... VA can stall on a CUE ( I waited 8 years to get one awarded)

However ,it appears the VA is working on my 2012 CUE request, as ebennie rep said it was with a specialist.

What I did that might have triggered the "fast" status ,if you could call it that, is that, in my NOD I made the point that

I was formally asking for a NOD extension due to Good Cause ( and referred them to the regs on that and attached the M21-1MR guidelines.)

Also I was formally filing the NOD,in case the extension isnt granted.

And I reminded them that my request that they call CUE on one statement in my AO IHD award letter ,was sent to them prior to my NOD and extension request because,

since the AO Nehmer award letter contained a clear and unmistakable Error, my rights as a claimant have been compromised by that error, and I cannot adequately prepare a NOD without having the error corrected.

Then I stated 'however, once the CUE is corrected, the need for considering my NOD as well as my request for a NOD deadline extension ,will be moot issues, requiring no further action on VA's part.

Maybe all that will help someone out there.

Our ability to prepare an adequate argument on appeal is hindered significantly if the VA makes a legal error (CUE) in the decision we are appealing.

Since the NOD is our first avenue of attack, the NOD has to be based on factual medical and legal statements .

If the legal statements VA makes are wrong, then our NOD is compromised as much as if they make some inaccurate medical statement, (adding potential years to the proper resolve of the claim.)

Remember that 38 USC 4.6 is a powerful tool.

If VA breaks their own evidentary criteria ,by failing to acknowledge probative and significant evidence that they have,(and you can prove they have it) then they have committed a clear and unmistakable error.

And they can fix it fast.....if they want to.......

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is actually for a CUE - this sounds really crazy -

because Aa CUE can only involve and consider the evidence of record

at the time the prior decision was made.

A CUE can not factor in evidence that was not of record back then, so

what would be a possible reason to hurry up and get this new evidence ?

IMO - This new evidence would not pertain to the CUE.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your CUE must involve only the evidence of record at the time and the regulations at the time.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 4 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:


      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.


      • 10 replies

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines