Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Berta's Lawsuit For Destroying & Postage?

Rate this question


Guest jangrin

Question

Guest jangrin

Berta,

Have you ever heard anything back, or have they responded to your lawsuit for destruction of your property and your postage, regarding IMO reports and costs for correspondence to VA over the past few years while waiting for the VCAA letter?

Jangrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I haven't heard a thing.

The District Counsel who got my SF 95 is the same one who found they had committed CUE in my offset.

Odd that you mentioned this- I have been getting my VA paperwork in order and found my older CUE on that offset- I should have pursued it when the BVA denied it.

Since getting my remand , my claim went into active appeals status and there has been movement on it daily since the remand occurred.

If the VA acknowledges my IMOs and my other evidence , then the lawsuit is a moot issue.

Jangrin-you reminded me- I will call VA counsel today and see what's up.

I really dont expect the VA to cough up $4500 -----past years of experience have taught me that I have to do whatever I can think of to get them to read my evidence. I think this charge made them read my evidence.

This might help someone out there-

Yesterday I went through an enormous file of rating decisions and SSOC etc from 1995 to 1998.

I pulled out many socalled VA "expert" doctors opinions that denied my past claims many times.

I won those claims but when I read over the expert stuff that they used to deny them- it was

ludicrous stuff, not medically sound at all---

In those claims I had no IMOs-never gave a thought to getting any---

I carefully broke down each medical statement they had made with medical evidence in the med recs, and their own regs, excerpts of treatices from the standard medical community, and anything else I could think of.

My vet rep told me many at the VARO still remember those days because I did everything I could think of to get them to read my evidence. They think I am difficult to deal with. I sure am-I send them their regs every time they misapply the law. I got denial after denial in the 1990s and yet I ended up proving the claims anyhow.

I should correct that- the medical evidence proved those claims.

As long as the VA can ignore bonafide medical evidence, they can continually deny a claim.

Also- getting a copy of my c file was the best thing I ever did.

I am still shocked at what was in there- all the 'lost' stuff, even a sensitive medical report of 1995 that proved my Sec 1151 claim-a claim they strung out for 3 more years and said they had no such report at all.

It was right there in the c file with all the other evidence that disappeared when those claims were in progress.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

Berta,

Do you think that if you had recieved the VCAA letter back when you filed the first claims for Rod it would have made any difference in how your claim was handled by the VA? Could it have cut the initial time frame for an iniital rating and eventual appeal?

I am even more convinced that the VCAA letter triggers ALL activity on the claim. I believe there is something about the VCAA letter and signed election form that holds the raters to a time table of sorts. I think the Vets who have gotton the VCAA letters claims seem to go smoother than thoose who have not recieved this notice.

If the Veteran or spouse does not get the VCAA letter within about 45 days of filing their claim, they should really fire off a letter to the VA RO and call and bug the SO for the letter. It must state in the letter what the veteran needs for evidence to succeed in having their claim awarded.

My husband has finished all the standard stuff requested by VA and had his VA disability exam. Its eight months since filing and the exam doctor said he should hear something in the next three months.

We'll see, so far so good. You know the standard AO DMII with ALL the secondaries.

Jangrin :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes- I believe you are absolutely correct Jangrin.

The VA knows that without the VCAA letter-the veteran does not have a specific statement as to what evidence they need.

Therefore the VA can deny and set up the appeal route to the BVA.

The Remand rate of my VARO -41 % as of last year- is based in a great degree to remands due to these VCAA violations.

The BVA cannot decide the claim as the RO has failed to tell the veteran what they need to award the claim.

I have been on the phone with VA counsel since my last post. We discussed many issues of VA case law and -as I always say here- these people are really on the ball-

If the VA properly addresses my IMos within the next 6 months- I will drop my property damage claim-as I told the lawyer-

because it means they have acknowledged my evidence.

We went over the benefit to me of a proper award under Nehmer.

It was clear to VA counsel that there was a probative reason behind my SF 95.

As long as the RO can ignore my evidence, they dont have to pay. He was surprised at the difference in benefits when one gets direct SC death compared to Sec 1151 death.

There is the question of honor too- I told him every time I get my DIC check I realise it is because the VA killed Rod. There is no honor in that and my 2003 claim was due to the fact that I discovered how they killed him and why they did not give him appropriate medical care.

I want a DIC check due to Agent Orange death.That would be the Peace with Honor that Rod deserved and I will relentlessly contiue to pursue that.

I am glad I called him because they never had a SF 95 like this before and he now fully understands the point of it.

If counsel fails to act upon my SF 95 after 6 months, I can file suit in federal court.

I have every reason to expect that the VARO will resolve my claim by then and the SF 95 will be moot.

Otherwise I will certainly will file suit in federal court.

(PS_ I have been waiting for months to get copies of a 646 from my POA.)

A 646 is the final statement of support for a claim that POAs who do not have an office in Washington DC often send to VARO in support of the appeal.

POAs usually send 21-4138s to the VA in support of claims and evidence submissions.

My POA only sent one in when they heard I got a remand- they gave me no support on that and were surprised that the remand occurred.

In 3 1/2 years they had never sent the VARO any 21-4138s in my behalf which is VERY unusual. I made over 30 submissions of medical evidence.

A 646 is not mandatory but my POA said (in email) that one had been prepared the day before my claim was transferred to the board. This bothered me because if one reads my appeal, I clearly stated how VA case law had been broken and my rights were violated.If my POA prepared a 646, they should have jumped right on these errors and supported that the transfer to BVA was illegal.

I was told that one was prepared but they have still failed to produce a copy of it.My new vet rep and his new contact at the VARO had again promised me a copy of it.

If they did not prepare it,they too have violated my rights.

There is a way to pursue that through the state of New York -who pays them.

This claim is under the Nehmer class action lawsuit and the minute they award SC death, they owe more money that I realised when I filed the claim.

This is the single significance reason my claim has been screwed up from the git go- not only by VARO but even by my own POA.

It is exactly what I went through in the late 1990s.Ignore the evidence - so the RO doesnt have to make the award.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use