Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Soldier81
My appeal for sleep apnea has a five year old effective date in April. I originally filed for the claim in April 2010. I had a C&P examiner that either doesn't do her job at reading STRs or just had something against my claim which is be. The examiner should do what the law says and her job entails. She stated that there was no mention of my sleep disturbances and excessive snoring or waking up at night having to readjust in order to breath. However after the denial I sent evidence of just that to the BVA. They decided to remand it back to the RO with these instructions
If the September 2010 examiner is available request that the VA examiner offer an addendum opinion regarding the Veterans sleep apnea. If the 2010 examiner is not available schedule the veteran for another examination.
The entire claims file must be reviewed by the examiner in conjunction with the opinion. The examiner should confirm in the examination report that she she has reviewed the folder in conjunction with the examination.
Therefore the examiner should opine as to whether it is at least as likely as not (50 percent chance or higher) that the Veterans sleep apnae had its onset during, or is due to service.
The opinion should specifically address the veterans March 2009 diagnosis of sleep apnea which occurred prior to his weight gain from 207 to 242 pounds.
The opinion should also address the reported instances of snoring and difficulty sleeping contained within the Veterans STRs.
Then readjudicate the issue on appeal. If any of the benefits sought on appeal remain denied furnish the Veteran and his representative with a supplemental statement of the case and afford them the opportunity to respond before the file is returned to the board for further consideration.
Another thing wrong with the C&P examiners opinion was that she tried to make it look like weight gain was at fault for my sleep apnea stating I gained 35 pds from 2008 to 2010 but I weighed 207 pds during my sleep study in 2009. I stand 6 ft 3 inches tall 207 pds is not fat by any means. The remand is in the decision approval status anyone know how long it generally takes to finish up. Straight forward non jealous feed back is much appreciated. If you come off like a jealous jellyfish green with envy then I will just blow you off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
3
2
2
Popular Days
Jan 20
8
Jan 19
3
Jan 21
2
Jan 18
1
Top Posters For This Question
Soldier81 6 posts
Navy04 3 posts
john999 2 posts
USMC_HVEQ 2 posts
Popular Days
Jan 20 2015
8 posts
Jan 19 2015
3 posts
Jan 21 2015
2 posts
Jan 18 2015
1 post
Popular Posts
Soldier81
USMC, I had little knowledge of SA during service all I knew about were my symptoms. My statements should be more than enough for them to play connect the dots. I had my sleep study done after servic
16 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now