Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
ddj6969
The patient stated he was seen in 2000 for the n/t in his arms. There are notes that appear to be EOBs that support his claim that a neurologist and radiologist in (state x) billed the insurance for visits on 5/18/2000 and 5/25/2000 for brachial neuritis and cervical ddd, respectively. However, there are some inconsistencies in the history. It seems unusual that a patient would be seen by a specialist and have an mri done just a few days before their separation exam
from the military and then it did not appear to be mentioned in the separation exam; however, the report of medical history that often accompanies enlistment and separation exams was not present in the strs either which is often where that would be reported. Nonetheless, a problem necessitating an mri and specialty consultation a few days prior would have been expected to be mentioned by the
patient to/by the provider on the separation exam, even if the neuro exam at the time was normal. As noted in the prior c and p exam, there is no informatino in the strs about the neck or arm symptoms. This va examiner interpreted the patient
to say that his records from the base there in (state x) were destroyed; however,his separation exam was in the strs - how is it that all other records except the separation exam were destroyed from that location? Unfortunately, Dr. (x) (neurology) office does delete records after 7 years- as reported by the patient and verified with the clinic staff at that office by this va examiner. Unfortunately, the mri center (where Dr. (x) works) has films back to 2005 and has written rad reports back to 2000 but they did not have a report or evidence
of the patient being there in 2000-- but the patient's name showed up in the system at their office. Even though there is substantial evidence he was seen for something related to brachial neuritis in 2000, there is no objective evidence in any medical record to indicate what the symptoms were exactly- if they were unilateral or bilateral. Regarding the mri, there is no objective evidence to indicate the specifics about the cervical ddd without having a medical record or rad report regarding the exact findings. The veteran currently has symptoms in the c8-T1 dermatome. In 2013, he informed the c and p examiner that the symptoms were in his entire arms and hands. The emg in 2013 was normal. Though emg/ncv studies can be normal in presence of radiculopathy, more often than not, these studies identify an abnormality when present, especially if present for so many
years as reported. The cervical spine xray revealed mild degen changes of the cervical spine and narrowing at the right C4-C5 neural foramen. Based on all the above factors taken into consideration, there is insufficient medical evidence to determine a nexus between the symptoms reported in 2000 and the current symptoms.
The symptoms even changed some since the last c and p exam in 2013. Therefore, it is less likely as not that the Veteran's cervical spine disability with bilateral neuritis of the upper extremities was incurred in or caused by military service.
I like the part where I am basically called a liar.
I have not got the response from the DRO yet but I expect a denial. What would be my next step?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
1
1
1
Popular Days
Feb 9
4
Feb 8
2
Top Posters For This Question
ddj6969 3 posts
Berta 1 post
Mikemmlj 1 post
Buck52 1 post
Popular Days
Feb 9 2015
4 posts
Feb 8 2015
2 posts
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now