Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C%p Notes, Can I Expect A Denial?

Rate this question


ddj6969

Question

The patient stated he was seen in 2000 for the n/t in his arms. There are notes that appear to be EOBs that support his claim that a neurologist and radiologist in (state x) billed the insurance for visits on 5/18/2000 and 5/25/2000 for brachial neuritis and cervical ddd, respectively. However, there are some inconsistencies in the history. It seems unusual that a patient would be seen by a specialist and have an mri done just a few days before their separation exam

from the military and then it did not appear to be mentioned in the separation exam; however, the report of medical history that often accompanies enlistment and separation exams was not present in the strs either which is often where that would be reported. Nonetheless, a problem necessitating an mri and specialty consultation a few days prior would have been expected to be mentioned by the

patient to/by the provider on the separation exam, even if the neuro exam at the time was normal. As noted in the prior c and p exam, there is no informatino in the strs about the neck or arm symptoms. This va examiner interpreted the patient

to say that his records from the base there in (state x) were destroyed; however,his separation exam was in the strs - how is it that all other records except the separation exam were destroyed from that location? Unfortunately, Dr. (x) (neurology) office does delete records after 7 years- as reported by the patient and verified with the clinic staff at that office by this va examiner. Unfortunately, the mri center (where Dr. (x) works) has films back to 2005 and has written rad reports back to 2000 but they did not have a report or evidence

of the patient being there in 2000-- but the patient's name showed up in the system at their office. Even though there is substantial evidence he was seen for something related to brachial neuritis in 2000, there is no objective evidence in any medical record to indicate what the symptoms were exactly- if they were unilateral or bilateral. Regarding the mri, there is no objective evidence to indicate the specifics about the cervical ddd without having a medical record or rad report regarding the exact findings. The veteran currently has symptoms in the c8-T1 dermatome. In 2013, he informed the c and p examiner that the symptoms were in his entire arms and hands. The emg in 2013 was normal. Though emg/ncv studies can be normal in presence of radiculopathy, more often than not, these studies identify an abnormality when present, especially if present for so many

years as reported. The cervical spine xray revealed mild degen changes of the cervical spine and narrowing at the right C4-C5 neural foramen. Based on all the above factors taken into consideration, there is insufficient medical evidence to determine a nexus between the symptoms reported in 2000 and the current symptoms.

The symptoms even changed some since the last c and p exam in 2013. Therefore, it is less likely as not that the Veteran's cervical spine disability with bilateral neuritis of the upper extremities was incurred in or caused by military service.

I like the part where I am basically called a liar.

I have not got the response from the DRO yet but I expect a denial. What would be my next step?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This was what the DRO sent to the C&P:

Note 1: The Veteran's complete original service records are not available for review and the only available copies of record do not show neck problems while on active duty. However, the veteran has submitted copies of medical bills showing a consultation with Dr. (x). D on 5/18/2000 and subsequent MRI of the neck on 5/25/2000. Although the results of the MRI nor the actual treatment reports are available, for purposes of this opinion request, please consider as though the Veteran did report complaints/symptoms involving his neck and/or upper extremities while on active duty.

Note 2: The Veteran is claiming "neuritis/radiculitis" of the upper extremities related to his cervical spine disability. Please specifically examine for and report the presence or absence of an upper extremity diagnosis such as radiculopathy or neuritis and comment on whether or not it is attributable to his claimed neck disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I think you might need an IMO from a real doctor, like Dr Bash.

As a NeuroRadiologist, he is very familiar with interpreting MRI results and X rays..

"Although the results of the MRI nor the actual treatment reports are available, for purposes of this opinion request, please consider as though the Veteran did report complaints/symptoms involving his neck and/or upper extremities while on active duty."

Why were these records Not available?

And I sure wonder what kind of doctor did this C & P exam......as to their expertise.

Do you have a copy of the MRI results? DId You or the VA attempt to get them?

Any IMO doctor will sure need them.

I took a 2 page Neuro MRI result and matched it up with a copy of a photograph of an autopsied brain for my 1151/FTCA claim, and highlighted it , showing VA exactly what damage they had caused and where the damage was ,due to a severe misdiagnosis of my husbands TIAs and stroke.

I also matched it up with the findingsin his autopsy of the brain damage.

MRIs are a wonderful thing and can save lives .They can also be critical medical evidence.

.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The MRI exam and the consultation visit in 2000 were done with doctors who were not military. They only keep those records for 7 years. I did not even know I could be compensated by the VA until 2008. By that time the records were destroyed. I made every possible effort to get the records and so did the C&P examiner.

I am still holding out hope. If I do get denied Dr. Bash will be my next step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

How long ago was the exam on the MRI's?

Go get copies of all your exams MRI's countsulations ect,,ect,,and check on your military records also. if denied or rated unfairly

File NOD if you haven't yet!

Call Dr Bash As Ms Berta mention, He is very good with veterans claims and will get this straighten out for ya Buddy!

Be sure and make copies of Notes 1.& 2. from the DRO.

A good IMO from just a Regular MD or even a specialist would not be much help if they don't use the VA Guidelines or have the medical evidence!

JMO

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • navyvet2009 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use