Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Your Thoughts, Is This New & Mat Evd

Rate this question


paulcolrain

Question

im asking you all to judge the new letter at the bottom for your input on if new and material or not..........

my first denial for bilatteral hip strain stemmed from the C&P doc stating that no service connection because in my c-file STRs he couldnt find any high discreet traumatic event that could create my problems.

i had a DR at vamc write a letter : in the letter he stated :

It is of course possible that the rigors of physical activity ( multiple non specific traumas to both hips ) during his time in service accelerated the progression of any diseases and have contributed to his current symptoms. without medical evaluations to view during active duty it would simply be impossible to know. As Such , it seems as likely as not that active duty has contributed to the current level of impaired ability and pain in his hips...

i was denied again after that letter because i was told that the statement says impossible to know without documentation. ( my point was, this should have at least put both Dr. opinion into equipose) anyway i was denied stateing yes new but not material.

so, i get my c-file and find what the Dr. wanted.. 3 evaluations stating hip pain on movement due to physical activity fitness.. i forward these to the doctor and ask for an addendum to his letter. he replied with this new letter that im asking you all to comment on..

the patient provided 3 documents from his service file that serve for the basis of my opinion. they document that he was suffering from bilatteral hip pain at his time in service and suffering from this pain due to physical fitness, marching and running. Given this new information that i did not have it is clear to me that he suffered from hip problems in his time in service.it is therefore my opinion that his current hip problems are more likely than not the result of medical conditions that began in and/or accelerated and exacerbated by his activities as a soldier......

?????????? what you all think ???????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

That is considered material and can be used in an appeal issue. .

Using this info, ask for reconsideration.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

its a 50/50. I really think it is really up to the C&P doctor and the rater no matter how good your evidence is.... hopefully you will get it, ive been at this for over a decade

2004-06= 0%

2006-13= 10%

2013-14= 30%

2014-17= 90%

2017= 100%                  

2018 = 100% PT (still at BVA)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It sounds like 50/50. IMHO, I would only add that in your request for reconsideration and or NOD that you attach the documents that you provided to your doctor to review. Also to list your duty station, the date when you were treated and the clinic/hospital you were treated. If you have a page number of the documents that were in your C-file you can also list those. My point is basically don't give VA another opportunity to deny your claim. Keep in mind that a request for reconsideration is the same as requesting VA to reopen your claim. If it has been a year since your denial you will have to reopen the claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

These two statements together should get you a slain dunk award of service connection. At minimum benefit of doubt is in play.Both medical opinions and documentation in the service treatment records I can't see how they can deny....Get this on file like yesterday. ..You will win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"It is of course possible that the rigors of physical activity ( multiple non specific traumas to both hips ) during his time in service accelerated the progression of any diseases and have contributed to his current symptoms. without medical evaluations to view during active duty it would simply be impossible to know. As Such , it seems as likely as not that active duty has contributed to the current level of impaired ability and pain in his hips..."

This suggest to me that you had a pre existing condition prior to service.



the patient provided 3 documents from his service file that serve for the basis of my opinion. they document that he was suffering from bilatteral hip pain at his time in service and suffering from this pain due to physical fitness, marching and running. Given this new information that i did not have it is clear to me that he suffered from hip problems in his time in service.it is therefore my opinion that his current hip problems are more likely than not the result of medical conditions that began in and/or accelerated and exacerbated by his activities as a soldier......

This suggests to me that the pre existing condition (.possibly bi lateral hip pain )... was " aggravated" by service.

Yes I agree this is N & M. However, is the hip condition worse than it was in service and does the C & P exam results reflect it at a ratable level?

Does the 50% you get now have any bearing or association with this hip pain?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • navyvet2009 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use