Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Trying To Help My Grandmother

Rate this question


zcloudy

Question

At the urging of my father, who is a veteran, my grandfather applied for benefits roughly two years ago. He served aboard the U.S.S. Manley during the Vietnam War. He was aboard the ship when a powder case ignited in the breech of the forward gun mount. What I i understand from my grandmother, he was exposed to a chemical while near Da Nang.

My grandfather faced a number of health issues once he returned. He suffered from heart vavle problems and diabetes. The reason my grandparents decided to appy in the first place was because my grandfather was battling liver and bio duct cancer. His doctor at the VA hospital in Delware said he had a strong case. Unfortunately, my grandfather lost his battle with cancer in late June 2013.

My grandmother continues to fight the VA. She was initially rejected because they claimed he was no where near Vietnam. My grandmother highlighted that part of the rejection letter and sent back a letter from a high-ranking officer aboard the ship at the time attesting to the fact they were there as well as newspaper clippings aboard the explosion and the ship dropping off Senator Henry Jackson following the explosion in Da Nang.

She has since been told by a Veteran's advocate that she will receive around $1,200 a month under the classification of diabetes. Although this seems like a step in the right direction, something still seems fishy about the whole situation, which is why I am posting it here.

Should my grandmother consider herself lucky to get anything at all here? Is there anything else she could do? Would she receive just the monthtly payments or should she get retroactive payment from when they made the claim?

I know absolutely nothing about his process and am asking for advice for her. What I have written is what I've been told over the years so if there are any inaccuracies please let me know.

Thank you for your time reading this and thank you for your service to our country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

"What I understand from my grandmother, he was exposed to a chemical while near Da Nang. "

Was the chemical Agent Orange? where was he 'near' Danang"

http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/shiplist/list.asp

I dont see his ship on the VA AO ships list.

"She has since been told by a Veteran's advocate that she will receive around $1,200 a month under the classification of diabetes. "

I guess she had very strong evidence that showed he served in Vietnam.(Boots on ground)

The above ship's list is the most recent one I know of.

"Should my grandmother consider herself lucky to get anything at all here? Is there anything else she could do? Would she receive just the monthtly payments or should she get retroactive payment from when they made the claim?"

If the 21-534 DIC application was filed within the first year after the veteran's death, and succeeds, the retro should go back to his date of death. Othersie it will be back to the date of the claim.

Does the Death Certificate reveal an Agent Orange disability (The full presumptive list is here under a search) as the prime cause of death, or as a substantially contributing factor?

"He was aboard the ship when a powder case ignited in the breech of the forward gun mount. What I i understand from my grandmother, he was exposed to a chemical while near Da Nang. "

Was this in Danang Harbor?

Danang Harbor ,per VA , was not exposed to AO. That has been challenged in court and by Feb 25th we AOers will know more.

I am survivor of an AO Vietnam vet, he served in Da Nang.

.
"something still seems fishy about the whole situation, which is why I am posting it here."

Fishy To me too ...but that is because we don't have all of the facts.

"His doctor at the VA hospital in Delware said he had a strong case."

Did he say ( and document) what he meant by that? a strong case for what?

"and the ship dropping off Senator Henry Jackson following the explosion in Da Nang."

you mean he, yiour grandfather, was "In" Danang?

Was he part of the landing party for the Senator?

If the DIC claim succeeds she will be eligible for Chapter 35 educational benefits as well as CHAMPVA medical.I get both ,have used both, and they are wonderful benefits. She could also be eligible for property tax rebates and maybe other things.

I get a good sized property tax break on my farm and a discount on my fishing license due to my DIC.

She must have Medicare Parts A & B to be eligible for CHAMPVA.

Did she formally file a Notice of Disagreement yet?

Not enough info here to opine on the claim.

And even if it is regarding Agent Orange at all.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You might try to get information from anyone who might have served with him. There is a site dedicated to the USS Manley (http://www.ussmanleydd940.org) there is a tab to "Contact Us". It is unclear if the Manley put into DaNang to off load the senator or if he was helo'd in. As Berta points out Manley is not on the list of ships for presumptive AO exposure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Excellent info from toddt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you all for the information. Sorry my information has been so vague. It's all come second hand from an hour long conversation with my grandmother. Im going to look further into her paperwork (she kept everything) and see what I can figure out.

I'm also going to go to her next meeting with the veteran's advocate in early March.

Also, I've found out that he filed a claim before he died. Following his death (definitely within a year) she filed her own claim, which was rejected. She appealed and recently received word she won the appeal. My biggest question of the veteran's advocate is where the actual letter from the VA is.

Edited by zcloudy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

It sounds to me like she's been awarded Dependents Indemnity Compensation (DIC), which is about $1250 a month but if that's correct and she was married to him for the 8yrs directly preceding his death she should get another roughly $250 a month, for a total of about $1500 a month, plus or minus. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use