Please send me your thoughts on the below situation..
1. Claimed denied 2000. Reason for VA denial: No Service Treatment Records.
2. I submitted NOD with two in service treatment records that I received from NPRC (all other in service treatment records were missing).
3. VA listed the two submitted medical records and sent me a Statement of the Case continuing to deny reopening my claim. VA stated that the two medical reports did not document the contention that I was filing a claim for. I did not appeal and the claim became FINAL. THIS WAS THE LAST FINAL DECISION.
4. 2010, I submitted a request to reopen the claim and submitted a nexus and referred to a VA form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim and a Detailed nexus letter along with the request to reopen.
5. VARO denied my claim 2010 claim to reopen.
6. I submitted a Notice of disagreement.
7. VARO sent me a Statement of the Case and I immediately returned the Statement of the Case.
8. My Appeal remained under certified to BVA at the VARO from early 2011 until late mid 2014.
9. March 30, 2015 The Board of Veterans appeals granted the claim. I have not yet received a rating from the VARO!!!
10. In the BVA decision, the Board stated the following:
a. The 2010 decision was final.
b. Although the majority of the service treatment records are unavailable, one service treatment record, dated in February 1993, has been associated with the claims file and reveals that the Veteran was seen for a condition that the veteran has clarified was the condition he is seeking compensation.
c. There is also a notation of treatment in June 1995, which although blank, was noted by the veteran to be one of many visits that he had for his claimed condition.
d. The Board finds that this evidence weighs in favor of the Veteran´s contention that he sustained the leg condition in service.
e. Although the remaining service treatment records are unavailable, and thus unable to provide insight as to any other in-service leg injury sustained by the Veteran during service, the Board finds that the Veteran´s statements are credible as to his in-service leg condition as they are consistent with other evidence of record.
Questions:
1. Does the in service treatment record become mute, because they were noted in the SOC for the 2000 decision that became final.
OR
2. Does the in-service treatment records noted as associated with the claims file by the VA support an earlier effective date in accordance with 38 USC 3.156c.
(1)Notwithstanding any other section in this part, at any time after VA issues a decision on a claim, if VA receives or associates with the claims file relevant official service department records that existed and had not been associated with the claims file when VA first decided the claim, VA will reconsider the claim, notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section. Such records include, but are not limited to:
(ii)Additional service records forwarded by the Department of Defense or the service department to VA any time after VA's original request for service records;
Any feedback with fact comments would be greatly appreciated..
I want to be prepared when I get the rating, hopefully, soon..
Question
add55p
All
Please send me your thoughts on the below situation..
1. Claimed denied 2000. Reason for VA denial: No Service Treatment Records.
2. I submitted NOD with two in service treatment records that I received from NPRC (all other in service treatment records were missing).
3. VA listed the two submitted medical records and sent me a Statement of the Case continuing to deny reopening my claim. VA stated that the two medical reports did not document the contention that I was filing a claim for. I did not appeal and the claim became FINAL. THIS WAS THE LAST FINAL DECISION.
4. 2010, I submitted a request to reopen the claim and submitted a nexus and referred to a VA form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim and a Detailed nexus letter along with the request to reopen.
5. VARO denied my claim 2010 claim to reopen.
6. I submitted a Notice of disagreement.
7. VARO sent me a Statement of the Case and I immediately returned the Statement of the Case.
8. My Appeal remained under certified to BVA at the VARO from early 2011 until late mid 2014.
9. March 30, 2015 The Board of Veterans appeals granted the claim. I have not yet received a rating from the VARO!!!
10. In the BVA decision, the Board stated the following:
a. The 2010 decision was final.
b. Although the majority of the service treatment records are unavailable, one service treatment record, dated in February 1993, has been associated with the claims file and reveals that the Veteran was seen for a condition that the veteran has clarified was the condition he is seeking compensation.
c. There is also a notation of treatment in June 1995, which although blank, was noted by the veteran to be one of many visits that he had for his claimed condition.
d. The Board finds that this evidence weighs in favor of the Veteran´s contention that he sustained the leg condition in service.
e. Although the remaining service treatment records are unavailable, and thus unable to provide insight as to any other in-service leg injury sustained by the Veteran during service, the Board finds that the Veteran´s statements are credible as to his in-service leg condition as they are consistent with other evidence of record.
Questions:
1. Does the in service treatment record become mute, because they were noted in the SOC for the 2000 decision that became final.
OR
2. Does the in-service treatment records noted as associated with the claims file by the VA support an earlier effective date in accordance with 38 USC 3.156c.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
3
2
1
Popular Days
May 23
9
May 24
3
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 4 posts
add55p 3 posts
Buck52 2 posts
john999 1 post
Popular Days
May 23 2015
9 posts
May 24 2015
3 posts
Popular Posts
broncovet
Yes, its still there. Its called an "informal claim for increase" where a hospital exam can be an informal claim for benefits. But dont bet the farm VA will do this! 38 CFR 3.157: https://www.law.
broncovet
According to what you posted, the March, 2015 Board decision "granted your claim". Did the board say you got the effective date you wanted? You have 2 choices: 1. If you dont like the "Board"
john999
You know that sometimes you can use a hospital admission as the basis for an EED. I did this back in 2001. I think that regulation has not changed? It used to be that a hospital admission could be
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now