Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lod Approved Now Removed Want A Formal Lod Done

Rate this question


malandroaz

Question

I am currently in the reserves. I had a shoulder injury while I was training and told my commander when it happened. The commander said okay if your pain does not go away then go to the doctors. Less than 48hrs I go to doctor because my pain never went away. I had the 2163 filled out and completed. My commander signed off on my LOD as informal because she was there when I got hurt.

I did physical therapy but did not work and surgery was needed. This is a year later from the original LOD. I filed INCAP because I will be out of work for period of time. My INCAP gets denied "put on hold" because regional command says that the initial LOD was not done properly. That they want a formal LOD done.

I feel that they want to screw me out of my INCAP pay. How can they revoke a LOD issued already by my commander with nothing has changed?

Edited by malandroaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

malandroaz

It's probably OK, just get your facts together and be prepared to talk to the LOD investigating officer with your evidence and build your case. One important aspect of this may be to get "buddy statements" from anyone that was there or by you when the incident occurred if you can? Frankly, soldiers get hurt in training and the fact that you already had an informal investigation, should bode well for your case? Certainly, the commander can formalize the LOD but it may not be required in your case unless there were any earlier concerns about, misconduct, drugs or alcohol? Besides, unless someone took a blood test or urine sample during the informal investigation anyway at the time then that ship has sailed long ago? But from what I've been able to research is that when a soldier is on duty and doing their job of training, then the perception is that the incident is usually within the rules of being in the line of duty LOD? I was concerned about this myself and got all spun up about it but in the end it's about just doing your job as a soldier when on duty. If you do some basic research and "just google LOD" , and you will find LOD Investigation regulations for every service and they are very similar. Now, I will tell you that the VBA is not bound to accept service LODs but as a matter of practice, they generally accept the findings of the service LOD. That said, they (VBA) can also make their own determinations and findings given the evidence and statements that they see. Also, I even searched thru numerous VBA Appeals with regard to LODs, unless over wise stated in the records, there was a tendency for the Appeals Board to give the Vet, the benefit of a doubt for the LOD? One of the most striking things that I found is that very few LODs are ever done in the first place and when they are it's because someone suspected drugs and alcohol use while someone was driving to and from AD Training? Also, a new twist is the question, "was the service member wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident"? So, it's best to always be safer rater than sorry. My advice is for you to communicate with your chain of command, figure out what you/they need for the LOD and get it wrapped up. In most cases, they are just doing their jobs and there is no hidden agenda. Besides, no one likes doing paperwork but the military seems to run on it....good luck and Godspeed...rootbeer22..

Edited by rootbeer22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks Rootbeer. At the division level the LOD was approved but since I filed INCAP pay (loss of civilian work) while in recovering they wanted more paper work. My guess is unless you lost eye, leg or arm if you request INCAP they will do formal investigation. Kinda BS for people with a torn knee or shoulder. The want to make 110% sure that if they pay out $$$ it is going to be correct. I just received a sworn statement from a direct witness and still waiting for the old commander to send me her statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use