Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cardiac And Cerebral Arteriosclerosis

Rate this question


Guest jangrin

Question

Guest jangrin

Berta or anyone else with experience with this condition,

I have been trying to research the connection with Cardiac Arteriosclerosis and Cerebral atrophy. It seems that these are connected, as one is called a heart attack and one is called a stroke. But in essence they idiology is the same. Both are silent killers and both seem to be connected to arteriosclerosis.

I know that in the past you stated that your late Husband, Rod, sufered from multiple mini strokes. my questions to you, if you don't mind are as follows:

1. Could you give me an idea of the symptoms (physical and mental) changes that you observed in Rod prior to his death. I have not been able to find preemptive symptoms only end result ie. stroke. Did you notice any behavior changes or mental capacity differences.(if you recall)

2. Do you have any studies that may be helpful to me in this area?

3. Why do you think the VA does not do a brain scan on the Veteran once they are diagnosed with heart artheriosclerosis? If it shows deterioration of the brain blood flow and hardening of the arteries is this a compensable disability for the veteran?Can we request the brain scan or any other opporpriate tests.

4. Do you think that this is compensable as a secondary to DMII?

Thank you for your help and experience in this topic.

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Yes-these are most often related and most likely due to diabetes-in this way-

Atherosclerosis means the arteries have narrowed.Narrwed arteries can cause clots.The lipid hypothesis can cause the clotting (hyperlipidemia-bad cholestrol balance)

If the brain trauma is ischemia and not from hemmorage- this also suggests highly that diabetes is the cause.

1.Rod exhibited blurred vision, dizziness and nausea due to what the VA said (in 1997)were undiagnosed mini strokes in 1988- (transcient ischematic attacks). He also had burning mouth syndrome during these attacks which -I discovered for my new claim-was glucose spillage into his saliva. He also had a silent heart attack the month prior to these attacks at the VA.(undiagnosed until after his death)

The visual disturbances that seemed to go along with these mini strokes (mini-but extensive brain damage resulted) caused him problems on the job at the VA -reading information. Also he could not remember the date or other things to do with the job-He shot the first deer in the county in 1987 (1987 VA employment physical was vision 20/20 without glasses)but found he needed a scope in 1988 right after these attacks- and when I drove out 6 deer from our woods -right past him-he didnt even take a shot at them. His vision seemed to get worse even though VA gave him glasses.

Oddly enough his memory of Vietnam was still intact and it seemed only short term information would vanish-stuff that happened in last few days or weeks -he could not remember.

When he had a major totally disabling stroke in 1992- the VA was able to separate his PTSD from the stroke problems with numerous psychiatric tests.

He had to leave Voc Rehab not only due to his major physical impairments but had lost short term memory retention anyhow- no way one can go to school with that problem.

As two VA doctors stated his PTSD exacerbated his major stroke.A stroke can alter one's personality and dealing with a mental disorder too just makes it all worse.

He died suddenly of a heart attack.

I found that the med recs showed he had heart disease they never diagnosed or treated for 6 years- and the VA concurred that they caused his death by failure to treat the initial heart attack and all of the brain ischemia properly.

2. I have a lot of info and will PM to you some links-

The BEST one is the VA's own training letter however-will send that- as the VA recognises that strokes and ischematic brain trauma and heart disease are most often caused by diabetes unless there is another medically proven etiology.

3.If strokes, whether called "mini" strokes or not, whether they show little brain damage or not can be compensated if they affect the veteran to a ratable degree and can be service connected if caused by a SC disability.

The VA in my husband's case only treated symptoms and not cause.I had to threaten them to give him a CT scan that revealed his major stroke. They thought it was labyrinthitus and gave him no proper medical care for 3 weeks. AFter I threatened them and he got the CT scan- a nurse told me he would die if I didnt get him out of there. His transfer was already being set up.His doctor was a complete idiot. He was so athrophied when he was sent to another VAMC that they said he would never walk again-but he did.We had to demand rehabilitation.

The MRI he got in 1992 revealed 6-7 areas of brain trauma.

In your case I would sure ask for the CT scan or brain MRI to be done if you have any reason to believe that your husband has suffered from any type of stroke due to his diabetes.Heart disease does not always cause brain trauma or athrophy but if you have observed any change in his memory or behavior or vision at all- this is a good reason to ask the VA to give him an MRI.

I dont know if they will or not though.

Memory problems, balance problems, visual problems, any change in personality, there are many symptoms of transcient strokes.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use