Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

1600 AO Claims Missed by Contractor, WTF!

Rate this question


Gastone

Question

I wasn't aware the VA used outside Contractors, to review Comp Claims Applications for possible AO exposure. They were paid $300/350 depending on thickness of C-File. They allegedly had very little AO training and quite often spent only a few minutes reviewing each file. Apparently at least 1600 AO Associated Claims were missed and not referred for Nehmer expediting.

We learn something new everyday.

Agent Orange benefit screening process scrutinized in Congress _ McClatchy DC.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

And why should this surprise anyone?

For years after the Entrance Exam showing Vietnam service, and various other problems, the VA Failed to add my name to the Nehmer list.

It took the class action lawyers to make that happen. (And that was after one claim had already been approved as an A.O. preumptive.

Veterans can depend on the same old thing- if there is a way to screw things up, it's more likely than not that the VA and it's minions will.

Just to add further insult, the problems have been known for decades, and were generally ignored. (They cost too much to fix, don't you know!)

 

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah...I wasn't on the Nehmer list either and have another potential CUE I am working on , a CUE on their AO Nehmer IHD award.

The IHD was never properly diagnosed or treated in my husband's lifetime,but the FTCA settlement and a 2004 CUE I had filed ,meant they had to finally rate and award it.

Somehow they determined that when my husband first presented heart disease (this evidence was all in his VA Med Recs) they determined his IHD was 50% disabling back to 1988. And then up until he died, with IHD as the prime cause of death, in 1994.

Subsequent records I found warranted a higher rating than the 50%, and with no treatment whatsoever ,at 50%, it certainly became 100% because it killed him. I only recall the award says that a C & P ,done in 1988,  fixed the EED at 2 months after I felt the EED should have been. Odd the exam was for PTSD but you would think a C & P examiner would see the veteran had IHD, didn't know he had it, had no treatment or follow up done to an abnormal EKG,and that some steps would be taken to get him treated for it in 1988......

Then again I must be nuts.... multiple doctors malpracticed on him at 2 VAMCS so why would I expect a C & P doctor to pick up on the medical error in 1988...I do not believe any VA med person had anything to do with determining the 50% rating because if they did the examiner might well have found the ischemic stroke he had was more than likely  due to the IHD.That is rated under 1151 at 100%.

 

I thought this would be discussed at yesterday's radio show but it wasn't. There is no doubt in my mind that many vets who should be SCed under Nehmer , aren't and maybe by now they are dead, with potential surviving family members who don't even know a claim could be filed.

I get emails on this latest AO BS everyday and I hope any adversely affected vets or their survivors stay tuned for whatever VA will do to correct this.

 

 

 

 

http://www.hdnews.net/news/local/agent-orange-benefit-screening-process-scrutinized-in-congress/article_f4f30385-6fc3-5e4b-aff7-9d11a1955517.html

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use