Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Should I get a lawyer?

Rate this question


Question

Posted

I separated from the Army in May of this year and have had a pretty quick process with my claim. I was seen in July and today received my ratings but that is where things take a ridiculous turn (as I'm sure is not uncommon). See, I don't have any combat injuries. In fact, my only "injuries" resulted from a completely non-necessary wisdom tooth extraction that was completely botched. While removing my teeth, they pierced my sinus cavity and damaged my trigeminal nerve (the one that controls basically half of your face). As a result to the nerve trauma I developed (and was diagnosed by Army Neurologists with) Paroxysmal Hemicrania; a very rare headache condition consisting of extremely painful one-sided head aches lasting only a few minutes but occurring near daily. Important to note that, by the way, my diagnosed headache condition states that I get headaches almost daily. As for the nerve damage...Ever bitten into something cold and had that horrible pain in your teeth? I have that in my bottom front teeth constantly combined with a burning sensation along my left side lower jaw. Again, this is diagnosed and I take 900MG of a nerve pain pill called Gabapentin (Neurontin) daily. On top of that, I have semi-paralysis of the left side of my face. I can't really feel it and I cannot fully close the left side of my mouth. When I smile, its not crooked because that side just doesn't do as much. This is all massively documented.

 

The decision I received from the VA stated that I got 0% for the nerve pain because "not warranted for neuralgia of the 5th cranial nerve unless the evidence shows the nerve damage is moderate". So constant pain that must be treated daily combined with partial facial paralysis does not constitute "moderate" damage?

 

For sinusitis 0% (infection from the piercing of my sinus cavity, they said I don't have "three to six non-incapacitating episodes of sinusitis characterized by HEADACHES, pain, and purulent discharge or crusting." Well, headaches are covered and I get a sinus infection at least every few weeks with crusting and purulent discharge...all documented.

 

For episodic paroxysmal hemicrania 0% (claimed as migraines, which is cool because they are completely different from migraines but whatever) I would need "characteristic prostating attacks averaging one in 2 months over last several months". Remember the whole "almost daily" thing about my headaches? Not sure how almost daily doesn't qualify as one in 2 months. 

 

Basically, I have the evidence to prove all of this. Hell, THEY had the evidence and somehow managed to ignore all of it and decide things that made no sense. So should I get a lawyer? Should I get seen by another medical provider for further evidence? I'm baffled here because they literally looked at my medical records and said "We're going to just ignore that". I am furious and confused and I need help.

 

 

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

kenvan19

check out this link

http://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files1/9703954.txt

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

I would get a lawyer when and if you feel that you are in deep water and don't feel competent to handle your appeals etc.   I think for your claim you need more evidence via an IMO and you need to appeal the rating decision.  Brother, do I know about military dental care.  I, too, had a couple of teeth pulled including a wisdom tooth in the Army.   The dentist made a mess of it.  I went to army dentist with clear case of TMJ  (1969) and the dentist was careful not to document my condition while doing nothing to treat it.  I remember claiming TMJ and finding out the dentist did not document the DX.  For the VA to ignore your evidence is nothing new.  This is why you must appeal via NOD to start.  I would get the IMO/IME type exams to bolster your claim and attack the exact points where VA has gone off the rails to low ball you. I would see a VA shrink also.  If this injury is causing you to feel depressed or socially isolated  due to disfiguring mess they made of simple tooth extraction you could even file a claim for depression or social phobia.   I feel for you since I also had the VA maim me with totally incompetent dentist.  They made no attempt to save my back tooth.  They just pulled it so I would not miss my trip to Vietnam. 

 

 

  • 0
Posted

@buck52 Awesome link! I'll keep that case file stored so I can reference it since its pretty similar to my own.

@john999 Oddly enough a friend of mine went in for the same procedure around the same time and has pretty much the same issues now. Sadly, she was also forced to break a profile and fell off a climbing wall and is now undergoing a med board for that but I'm going to forward buck52's information to her as well. Appreciate the support!

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator
Posted

If this was a RO decision, then the procedure is to file a NOD and ask for a DRO review.  Then, you should either get the benefits you seek or get a SOC.  If you get an SOC, then you have 60 days to file an I9, "Appeal to the BVA".  

You probably dont need a lawyer at this point, its not to difficult to file a NOD, and an I9.  If the BVA denies, then is a great time to get a lawyer.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use