Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

Question

My husband put in a claim for ihd/aortic valve stenosis secondary to diabetes, in 2009.  It was denied.  I have been doing some research and in 2012, they  did test on people with diabetes and aortic stenosis.  And they found they produce a protein that enhances inflammation that causes a greater risk of stenosis of the aortic valve much worse and faster, than someone with out diabetes.  My husband had surgery to replace the valve in 13.    Now his cardio doc says they can hear the murmur again.  My question is should we reopen that claim, file a new one etc. I know sometimes the va makes you feel like your trying to dig up everything.   And it says it can cause  more thrombosis activity.  He did have an embolism in the lungs in 2011, which they could not determine where it came from.  The doctor did say it went thru the heart.  He really had a lot more fainting like spells, dizziness and falling, before he had surgery.  He still has them, but I don't think it is as bad.  But if the mur mur is back, it worries me.  He says he will not be operated on again for his heart.  He try's to mow the yard.  Our yard has a hill in the back.  I think they did this to be able to get more houses in here.  He was mowing a small section that can not be mowed with riding mower.  I always watch him, when he is doing it.   Well he fell and rolled down the hill. Scared me to death.  Had to run out help him get up and set in a chair till he felt able to finish it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

treysnonna,

The easiest, and fastest way to get this resolved is to get a NEXUS letter from his cardiologist which MUST read that the "IHD/Aortic valve stenosis is more likely than not, secondary to diabetes", and file it as an original claim since it's been over a year from your denial letter for the condition.

Notice where the NEXUS letter MUST read ..."more likely than not.."?

Allan

2-2-0 HUAH!

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0

I agree with allansc2005.  There is a differnce between a medical research project that links "x" with "yP, and YOUR doctor stating that "x" caused "y".  The VA does not care what happens in the research, they have to verify what happened to "YOU", not the research group.  You have to have a statement from YOUR doctor that says its at least as likely as not YOUR stenosis is secondary to diabetes.  

You can point out to your doctor this research which shows a link, but he must make an opinion on "your" case, not the research group as everyone is different.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines