Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Federal circuit delivers "blow" to adding ratings.

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The entire SMC S rule was already confusing honestly........If one was IU PT then awarded an additional rating of another service connection 60% and another of 10%......Many state that is enough for SMC S, others say you have to be 100% schedular then another 60% individual rating on top of that.......I can never seem to find a straight answer, and I sure as heck can't find one from my vso and the va sure as heck won't get you a straight answer either.  I don't understand half of what this case law is saying honestly,  I think you need to know the cases it is referring to in order to understand exactly what it is saying, maybe you  can explain this in a nutshell?  Oh, I think I understand now.........it is saying that you have to have a combined on top of your 100% of 60, it has to be using VA math, not regular math.  I thought that was a given.

 

Edited by seminoles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

If I get where you are coming from, seminoles, then the above case would be irrelevant TO YOU.  Please dont hold me "to" this, its just my interpretation and Im not a lawyer, but the issue of whether or not "you" are eligible for SMC S depends on "which" of your disabilities to which you were rated unemployable.  If "all" of them were used to render you unemployable, then my guess is you are "not" eligible for statuatory SMC S.  

However, my interpretation of Howell means you "are" eligible for SMC S because (if you are tdiu), then you are not leaving the home "for work" and thus you meet the "howell Criteria".  

https://asknod.org/2014/08/25/cavc-howell-v-nicholson-what-smc-s-really-says/

For YOU, the Howell criteria for SMC S is summed up in this sentence:

Quote

Congress intended to provide additional compensation for veterans who were unable to overcome their particular disabilities and leave the house in order to earn an income as opposed to an inability to leave the house at all.

You probably will need an attorney to get this, the VA is not handing out "Howell criteria" SMC S like candy at a parade.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 YOU DON'T NEED TO BE 100% TO QUAILIFY FOR SMC

MR-1 has made some changes in 2016

if a veteran has a combined rating under 100% and has another separate disability rating  the kicker is  depending on the severity of that disability  rather or not SMC will be a statutory inferred rating.

I was reading the MR-1 Regulations /Previsions Today to see if they said anything about SMC 's for the EED.....I couldn't find anything on it  but it does make a big difference as to how a veteran is rated and for what. First they have different codes of ratings.  the (severity of the disability)

Example , I was giving TDIU P&T for my bad profound hearing  back in 2002 and I could not do the Job I was trained to do ...I found out today , had I known at the time of my rating  I could have or should have been inferred SMC -S back then. eh!

because it states if the veterans S.C. Disability is '' Permanent in Nature '' which it states this in my award letter (which mine did) then the rater is to inferred the SMC S as a statutory rating    that's in the MR-1  but it may not been that way in 2002?

I have other S.C. Disability's but the hearing loss is my #1 disability or actually my first claim filed claims since then & I made  it to two SMC's  and could possible get the hearing SMC......But I am finished with the VA  getting to old to worry about all the B.S.

BTW

That Pic of me above was taken some 47/48 years ago at 19 years old

Hine Sights 20/20

Normally a veteran with a 100% S.C. Rating and has another Separate  & Di stink S.C. Rating 60% or more  Qualify's for a statutory  SMC -S-H.B. rating.

 

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
11 hours ago, broncovet said:

If I get where you are coming from, seminoles, then the above case would be irrelevant TO YOU.  Please dont hold me "to" this, its just my interpretation and Im not a lawyer, but the issue of whether or not "you" are eligible for SMC S depends on "which" of your disabilities to which you were rated unemployable.  If "all" of them were used to render you unemployable, then my guess is you are "not" eligible for statuatory SMC S.  

However, my interpretation of Howell means you "are" eligible for SMC S because (if you are tdiu), then you are not leaving the home "for work" and thus you meet the "howell Criteria".  

https://asknod.org/2014/08/25/cavc-howell-v-nicholson-what-smc-s-really-says/

For YOU, the Howell criteria for SMC S is summed up in this sentence:

You probably will need an attorney to get this, the VA is not handing out "Howell criteria" SMC S like candy at a parade.  

Is this retroactive? Are Veterans going to lose benefits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder
5 hours ago, Blueboy said:

Is this retroactive? Are Veterans going to lose benefits?

I doubt it will be retroactive, but I am not a lawyer...

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use