Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ftca & 1151

Rate this question


gwvet90

Question

I called RO check status & they said 1151 was in suspention & c-file had been sent to Regional Council - they had jurisdiction....

Called R/C - (they were very nice) -said they get the file back to RO usually in a week.

1.) Once RO gets c-file back - will they proceed on the 1151? Or do they keep it suspended pending outcome of FTCA? (Our RO & RC are in different states)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

RC will usually proceed with the claim-

there are steps they have to take- first to see if they hold jurisdiction, then to see if there is a sovereignty immunity problem and then see if there is basis for the claim.

All of above doesn't take too long-

If VA docs are involved -they (VA RC) hold jurisdiction 99% of time-

Sovereign immunity-usually not a problematic issue-

basis for claim-this takes the longest and depends on many factors-

what does the medical evidence reveal and what disabling affects did this have to the claimant?

then -in some cases- Regional Counsel might start offering a settlement-

RC operates differently than the RO does with a Section 1151-

As you might recall-

RC wanted to start negotiations with me within months after hey got my FTCA claim.

Once I understood most of the med recs I presented counsel with a Prime Facie case, and called the RC to

get a feel of what I was dealing with.

It was no surprise to me when RC called me to begin negotiations shortly after that.

The Lawyers at the VA are the best of the best in my opinion-

I bet they could all make big bucks in private practice but they are some of many VA employees who truly know what they are doing.

They sure are nice here in NY too and even in VA in DC.

It will take time-

I hope you dont go through what I did-

after John called me to say he would begin negatiateion he also said he would walk over to the VARO with the medical report the VA provided, supporting the malpractice claim and get my Sec 1151 claim squared away.I was his last case , as regional counsel for VA, before his retirement date.

After he did that the VARO 'lost' the report, John (RC) retired, the Chief of Staff who prepared the report was canned and sued VA and got his job back, then retired instead.

My FTCA then took years longer as it went to DC (the VARO withheld much critical evidence at this point and I only found this out by contacting the VACO medical team-I thought they had the whole c file and med recs but much was missing-)and then over 3 years later I was awarded the Sec 1151.

GC settled wih me in July I think and forwarded all this info to the VARO for my DIC.

VARO denied the DIC claim again.

I called GC in DC and they called the VARO and finally got this all squared away.

You can see that these are stall tactics----not at the RC or GC level-but only at the VARO level.

These VARO tactics caused my FTCA- to be initially awarded in months- to take over 3 years.

The DAV as my POA had no input into the FTCA of course-but yet stood by and watched as the VARO

denied me numerous times under Sec 1151, without regard for the fact that so much evidence was missing.

All of the "lost" stuff -the most critical evidence I had -showed up-in my c file- when I asked for a copy of it 2 years ago.

My long rendition here has this point- these claims usually dont go through this type of rigamorale-

but do not trust the VARO to supply your medical evidence to Regional or to General Counsel.

Best to do that yourself.

I have another FTCA filed now and have been in good contact with the RC already on it.

The RC questioned the tort basis as they never got a tort like mine before.

I just sent him ,last week,a Fed Circuit opinion that supports my tort basis.

And a copy of a recent Iris Inquiry response I got from VA-

That completely supports my tort too!

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Berta,

So I should send all the VAMC records as well as private?

RC got the whole c-file - are they only concerned with the claimed issue, or do they look at all the other S/C claims, treatments, SOC, letters back & forth....... Or do they just look at the 1151 issue

I hope we don't have to go thru what you did either ! One big thing I learned here at hadit - get the records before filing.....

So RC can get the 1151 approved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RC doesn't really get the 1151 claim approved but their documented findings will support the Sec 1151.I think the only reason VA counsel took a report to the VARO for my DIC is because it was just down the block from him. He also wanted to establish my DIC because they had to determine an offset.RC really does not have anything at all to do with VA benefit claims.

I sent the VARO copy of my settlement papers in support of my 1151 claim.They ignored this.

But the RC will have a report after their investigation (had to get this under FOIA laws) that states whether the FTCA was awarded and exactly why.( this was a chilling report in my husband's case- I didnt get it for many years after the claims were awarded.)

When the RO finally awarded my DIC ,they quoted this report as basis for the award.

Counsel will not look at any other claimed issues-they just focus on the federal tort.

I would call them and ask the lawyer who is handling your tort claim for VA exactly what they need.

They will have full access to the medical records but it pays to send them highlighted copies if needed and also copy of any private records-if they need them. If they know you have IMOs that support the FTCA, good idea to let them know and send them copies.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use