Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Treysnonna

Rate this question


treysnonna

Question

Ok maybe someone will give their opinion.  First off a pic of hubbys SOC.  And letters from his drs.  Can you give me you opinion if it is worded good enough.  And notice in his regular md says he is not able to work due to his diseases.  Should we go ahead and file iu.  His appeal is for jan 15.  And they are currently working on dec 14.  If we do will it still stay in line.?

26E38A55-EDD3-4900-8A65-689A78FB75B7.jpeg

F116B6F2-5B15-47A5-94CA-D62A22DA24F6.jpeg

9F0EFC85-32A3-4214-9F5C-7890455FD695.jpeg

E55FC87E-92BA-4FE4-8103-55D3DBC90011.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

To me it sounds like he is saying that diabetes is not having that much effect on his kidney function.  But the diabetes has accelerated all of his diseases.  Which means they were all aggravated each other.  Now he was diagnosised with diabetes actually in 99, but the va has it 2001.  Diagnosised with aortic valve and mitral val insufficieny in 2008.  Then in 2011 diagnosised  with ckd. 2013 diagnosised with cad.  Aortic valve replacement in 2013.  He put in for high blood pressure I think when he got out of coast Guard in 92.  They denied.  And I believe he has put in for it since then.  I looked at sir and he had high blood pressure in 86.  They made him get it checked three consecutive days.  It was high every day.  And actually his sugar was on the high side then. Can someone opinion how this is going to go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

." "Can someone opinion how this is going to go?"

In my opinion, not well.   One doctor mentioned he cannot work but that was considering the NSC  renal disease along with the DMII.

Neither opinion fully complies with the IMO/IME criteria here at hadit.

Does your husband have diabetic heart disease or IHD?

If so has he claimed that due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam?

The atherosclerosis is the way to seek service connection to his renal disease-

Here is my search feature:

https://www.google.com/search?q=does+DMII+cause+atherosclerosis&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS695US695&oq=does+DMII+cause+atherosclerosis&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.10679j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

DMII can cause athersclerosis.

Lots of info at Google under this search link above on that-

A doctor would have to state that his  SC DMII caused the atherosclerosis , which in turn has caused his renal disease,(probably his HBP too)  and give a strong medical rationale bolstered by some abtracts/treatices from good medical sources.

It is called the metabolic syndrome, which a good Endocrinologist would understand.

I knocked down 2 VA Endocrinologist's opinions long ago when I was proving my husband had DMII -

(No diagnosis - no treatment) I was the first person to diagnose he had it - and I learned a lot about DMII but I also got 2 great IMOs from Dr Bash.He concurred with my lay medical opinion and added two other disabilities I have not claimed, solely due to my dead husband's  malpracticed DMII.

His heart disease (IHD) (Nehmer Award) and1151 stroke (RO award) had everything to do with atherosclerosis.... it can be a killer.

Others will chime in.

Maybe the doctor who opined that the DMII accelerated his atherosclerosis, and 'played a significant part' in  the kidney disease ,would be willing to provide a detailed IMO in that respect.

The IMO/IME criteria is in our IMO forum...he should use the "as likely or not" format for his rationale.

I think he should also explain the word 'deliterious 'to them, as part of his rationale.

This second opinion above was the better IMO of the two IMOs but it might  cause a Remand from the BVA, ( better then an outright BVA  denial)  but remands add more time to their decision.

The BVA isnt going to connect the medical dots here either, as I did, and might deny the claim again.

Now is the time to really get an opinion that the VA would have to accept.

Nothing is impossible .

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

His MD meant well, but the limited IMO really didn't cut the Mustard regarding an inability to do Ant Type of employment, to include Sedentary work.

Have him apply via E-Ben to the VA Voc Rehab Dept. A letter stating that in their Professional Opinion, your husband is currently precluded from the Voc Rehab program due solely to his SC Conditions and that in their opinion he is currently precluded from doing even Sedentary Work, could actually get him the IU Award.

When you have time, do a google search of Sean Kendal Law + "Tive ways to win your TDIU Claim. Note Number 4, I was recommending it back in 11, glad the Courts finally made it to the party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use