Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied dry eye syndrome from PRK surgery.

Rate this question


rigo8582

Question

I made a claim for bilateral dry eye from PRK surgery and was denied. I'm wondering if I could set some opinions on what the appeal battle would be like for this. Here is the Reasons for decision below:

Service connection may be granted for disability which began in military service or was caused by some event or experience in service.

VA examiner noted that although you have a history of PRK that could be contributing to your dry eyes, you also use a CPAP machine for sleep apnea which is most likely contributing to your dry eyes. It was noted that you do not consistently treat your dry eyes.

Service connection for bilateral dry eye syndrom (also claimed as bilateral eye condition) is denied since this condidition neither occurred in nor was caused by service.

Appreciate any advice on this.

Edited by rigo8582
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

What evidence did you use for your claim? for dry eyes?

Can you relate your sleep apnea to your military service? do you have any medical records from military about your S.A.? 

If not, if you snored while in military can you get buddy letters to give testimony that you were in the same unit and heard you snore  ect,,ect,,

your going to need a condition to be related to or secondary to an already S.C. Condition and of course help from a Dr   (IMO) Independent medical opinion to help you nexus that your condition your claiming was related to your military service......without service connection its impossible to win a CLAIM.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I agree....this needs an inservice nexus. ..or is the result of a an established SC condition.Was the surgery done in service?

 

https://www.va.gov/vetapp12/files2/1209433.txt

Secondary dry eye syndrome, right eye, due to inservice PRK.

https://www.va.gov/vetapp15/files3/1522780.txt

Veteran had received a “0” SC rating for dry eyes but fell into the 10% rating criteria in this decision. The Dry Eye rating criteria is in the decision.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The PRK surgery was done while I was in the military by the military at Keesler AFB to be exact. The reality is I've had dry eyes ever since the surgery which done in 2005. I originally denied a claim for the left cuz the guy that did my claims did Eye Pain and I'll be honest I didn't know anything back then. Also since the surgery was elective I was under the impression that I couldn't make any claims against.

As far as sleep apnea I'm starting the appeal on that now to get it secondary to my service connected GERD.

It seemed odd to me to say the VA examiner said the PRK surgery could cause it but not make it service connected at even a 0%. At least 0% I could atleast get eye drops without a copay.

Edited by rigo8582
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

In one of the BVA decisions abo0ve the BVA makes the point that:

"During the pendency of the appeal, the criteria for rating eye disabilities changed. However, because the Veteran filed her claim prior to December 10, 2008, the appeal will be considered under the former criteria. 73 Fed. Reg. 66543 (Nov. 10, 2008)."

You have the inservice nexus but  this does not make sense:

"It seemed odd to me to say the VA examiner said the PRK surgery could cause it but not make it service connected at even a 0%. At least 0% I could atleast get eye drops without a copay."

By "it" did the examiner mean "dry eyes" or just ' eye pain' as it seems the claim was filed for-

Can you scan and attach your  VA denial  decision here?( Cover C file #, name, addres prior to scanning it)

Edited 50 minutes ago by 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
11 hours ago, Berta said:

In one of the BVA decisions abo0ve the BVA makes the point that:

"During the pendency of the appeal, the criteria for rating eye disabilities changed. However, because the Veteran filed her claim prior to December 10, 2008, the appeal will be considered under the former criteria. 73 Fed. Reg. 66543 (Nov. 10, 2008)."

You have the inservice nexus but  this does not make sense:

"It seemed odd to me to say the VA examiner said the PRK surgery could cause it but not make it service connected at even a 0%. At least 0% I could atleast get eye drops without a copay."

By "it" did the examiner mean "dry eyes" or just ' eye pain' as it seems the claim was filed for-

Can you scan and attach your  VA denial  decision here?( Cover C file #, name, addres prior to scanning it)

Edited 50 minutes ago by 

I mean the dry eyes which was this claim was for. I did have a left eye pain claim that was denied that was filed back 2008 my apologies for not being more specific about that. This claim was only for bilateral dry eyes.

 

20180406_141524.jpg

20180406_141533.jpg

Edited by rigo8582
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Can you prove that the  Dry eyes condition started before you were using a CPAP machine?

This article is not a medical  article but does say that leaks in the CPAP can cause dry eyes.

http://www.sleep-apnea-guide.com/dry-eyes-from-cpap.html

Maybe the examiner (they use google a lot) found this same article to deny the claim.

I do not think the examiner's rationale was strong enough.

Y9ou could appeal and say that your CPAP has no leak, nor any other reason that could cause dry eyes, and that the dry eye condition began after the PTK surgery and before you acquired a CPAP (if that can be found factual)-

or if you pursue the Sleep Apnea cclaim, and succeed, then you an use the examiner's statements as  dry eyes ,due to the sleep apnea, as evidence.

Here is a BVA search link for dry eyes:

https://www.index.va.gov/search/va/bva_search.jsp?QT=dry+eyes&EW=PRK&AT=&ET=&RPP=10&DB=2018&DB=2017&DB=2016&DB=2015

I have not accessed more date ranges or whether VA denied due to CPAP before.You might find something there that would help more, or try to find any medical articles that disprove a CPAP machine, working properly, could cause dry eyes.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use