Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cherry picking information

Rate this question


Okemos_Veteran74

Question

Let's say I have to c&p exams for headache.

One C&P exam Links the headaches to traumatic brain injury.  The symptoms are not as severe on it. It would only allow me to get a 0% rating for headaches.

The second c&p exam has more severe symptoms, but it does not find a link between headaches and TBI.

In this example let's say that TBI is service-connected

Can the best information from one exam be used with the best information from the other exam? Or is only one whole exam usable? I guess I'm trying to say is it the best of or All or Nothing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Yes.  For example,  The VA can and does use a "diagnosis" from one medical exam, a "nexus" from an IMO/IME, and document the symptoms from still another doctor. 

You have to have documented medical evidence, but that can be from multiple doctors.   

When you read BVA decisions, the Board will stay stuff like:  Dr. J on 11-24-04 stated that the Veteran was diagnosed with depression.  However, Dr. P on 11-23-05, that the Veteran did not have depression but was Bipolar, and it had nothing to do with service.    

The case is remanded to the VARO to resolve this discrepency with a C and P exam.  

This is just an example.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I think you have a pretty good shot here because TBI can be related to headaches.

I'd get an IMO on this if you need too?if you know what the C&P Results are?

just because two Dr's give they're  Different opinions  You need  to find a Dr that says it is likely as not your headaches is related to your S.C. TBI.

or something close to this.

I can't see why you were not giving a rating for the TBI?  YOU WERE S.C. at 0% but a TBI is very serious  that is messing with long term other possible conditions...TBI can cause a lot of other things to happen in the future  it can take away your senses  like smell taste hearing loss  eye site.

Cause havc to your entire body.

TBI Messing with your Brain per say and can lead to these other conditions..but the way the VA is We have to wait for these symptoms to arise  and that's not fair to the  Veteran.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

 

 

I am rated 70% for TBI. Headaches were svc connected to TBI at 0% in one c&p.  In a second c&p for headaches, I believe the symptoms were  more severe.  I know this because i was having more trouble with headaches, and i reported the symptoms as more severe and occuring with greater frequency.

  I haven't seen the c&p because with was not done at the VA.  (Private company). I havent asked fora copy of the results.  I know that they are in my records because my VSO has read me the results.  

I am embarrassed about this but I havent had the energy to ask Janesville for copiess of my records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Roger that on the 70%TBI

you should be able to go to your VAMC release of Records Desk an request your records back to the C&P Date...even if this was a Private Contractor 

VES /QTC or other,  it takes about 3 weeks for the records to be transferred to the VA Records Dept.

Note: your entitled to one free copy of any of your medical records including C&P Exams..if you can't get your C&P Results contact your VAMC Director.

or check with the VBA Dept(Veterans Benefit Administration)

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use