Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hope for Blue Water Veterans

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Was "Blue Water" addressed in the 2017 IOM AO Study, Final Report?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

BWV was mentioned in the last IOM report:

"Veterans who stepped foot in Vietnam or served on its inland waterways anytime between January 9, 1962, and May 7, 1975, are presumed to have been exposed to herbicides when claiming service-connection for diseases related to Agent Orange exposure. Veterans in these circumstances can find the ship(s) on which they served in the list as well.

Exception: Blue Water Veterans with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma may be granted service-connection without showing inland waterway service or that they set foot in Vietnam. This is because VA also recognizes non-Hodgkin's lymphoma as related to service in Vietnam or the waters offshore of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era.

 

HMD report on Agent Orange exposure

VA asked the Health and Medicine Division (HMD) (formally known as the Institute of Medicine) of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to review the medical and scientific evidence regarding Blue Water Veterans’ possible exposure to Agent Orange and other herbicides.

HMD's report Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans and Agent Orange Exposurewas released in May 2011. The report concluded that "the committee was unable to state with certainty whether Blue Water Navy personnel were or were not exposed to Agent Orange."

(https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/locations/blue-water-veterans.asp)

There is considerable more info on the net on this issue:

https://www.veterans.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/BWN Testimony FTR 5.13.151.pdf

John Rossie wrote this report.

Also this just came out:

https://www.militarytimes.com/veterans/2018/05/04/new-blue-water-veterans-deal-could-mean-benefits-for-90000-vietnam-war-troops/

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I was familiar with the 2011  report but couldn't recall the particulars. I think it referenced, and still does, those ships operating within Vietnam Territorial Waters (12 Nautical miles), from low tide shore.

I was looking for the scientific  Data regarding AO disbursement from runoff & Rivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I dont know where data like that would be,but the AO ships list has grown over the years, primarly due to Vietnam vets proving their ship or vessel was exposed to AO.

Rivers and tributaries ,as Brown Water, were accessed by many types of vessels.

https://www.veteranslawblog.org/brown-water-agent-orange-claims/

This AO Ships list  list was posted 4 days ago- and is extensive: 

https://www.benefits.va.gov/compensation/docs/shiplist.docx

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I read up on it. There's no IOM scientific basis for inclusion of BWV. That would be a first for VA. If they grant, they'll have to include Vets who actually were exposed. Think about those thousands of Air Force, Army and Marines deployed in Thailand and Laos and you really have a VA budget deficit. They'd have to dump TDIU to even get close to balancing it. It intrigued me so much I wrote an article as I am wont to do..

https://asknod.org/2018/05/06/sunday-morning-first-you-love-me-and-then-you-fade-away/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The 2018 AO BW Ship List, specifies Dates personnel listed in respective Ship's Log had possible "Boots on Ground" in Nam, Landing Craft, Shore Leave etc.

As I recall, Jarhead REMF's stationed Camp Hanson, Okinawa would volunteer to do a 1 or 2-week work party at the 1st Mar Div HQ Danang, filling sandbags. That (1) week filling bags at the relatively safe Div HQ got them their Nam Service Medal and unbeknownst at the time, the "Boots" for the AO Presumptive. A few of them probably filed for PTSD (2013 or 14) after the Rules changed and added "Fear Of."

I haven't been able to find any AO Concentration data regarding AO disbursement within the 12 Mile Territorial Waters of Nam. Did time between operations along the coast aboard the USS Okinawa. As I recall, showers were all Salt Water except for periodic Desalinated Water Hours. If I were a Squid and the "AO BW" with Boots didn't apply, I go for a Direct AO Exposure from Daily Showers and Drinking of the Desalinated Sea Water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use