Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

VACO shake up


Berta

Recommended Posts

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Moderator

Yes, it seems to be a move in the right direction, but one thing is troubling:  

Apparently O Rourke, according to the article, lied to congress.  For that, he is made an "advisor" to VA?  Why would the VA want a known liar on its advisory panel?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There all in it together

.  I am headed to the VA today for a dermatology appointment on my skin condition  see if they can make a diagnose?   and   see if Robert Picture is up yet? 

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta!! and this goes right to the heart of my post the other day.

Ya the VARO are rolling through claims with quick denials...so they can get their quota and Bonuses!!! Even if that is how they get paid. 

The rollout of the national work queue for claims and my claim went to half way across the country so how the heck can I go do a VARO hearing with the rater?

And if I appeal will the C-File get locked to that VARO? 

The comments over there on that story is what I was trying to convey in my post from the other day. That VARO was mentioned by a prominent person here on his blog and some smells at that VARO. And it starts with the local leadership. 

I can imagine the senior rater at this VARO or any on claims and the atta boys they give out:

" Awesome denial way to go John!"

"That's the denial of the week Mary, great job!"

"Here is you reward for the most denials in 90 Days! Outstanding!"

"I love the way you deny Ted you are an example for the younger RO! Great work!"

"Keep those D's going folks the quarter is almost over! $$$$$"

and on and on. 

 

 

Edited by spearhead91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to think that RO's are rated by the number of remands they receive.  Particularly in ones where the RO is called out for not following procedures, like ignoring buddy statements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA has it's own little deep state-

I have finally prepared my last (hopefully last) CUE for the VA.

I am still reeling over 2 phone calls I got from their Director in 2015.

I decided to drop a dime on her in the CUE claim.That is I prepared the exact legal errors they made, but once again my VCAA rights were denied, as well, and I had to explain that  as that led to the CUE.

She called me to "explain" the denial of 1151 accrued, saying  me my husband's 1151 Stroke was total but not permanent when he died.

That defies his autopsy, death certificate, and all the evidence of permanancy I supplied with my 5103 waiver- not to mention why I won my FTCA case for wrongful death.

I asked her what miraculous cure he got because the Medical Examiner found multiple brain infarctions in addition to the 1151  disabling stroke.But her only response was that the claim was OVER.

I am angry at myself for not pursuing this matter sooner.I thought by now she would be gone-

Twice the RC and OGC ordered them  to pay me over the years , and I think she is still poed at that.

My evidence of legal error is OGC Pres Op 08-97, 38 CFR 2.6 (e)(8) AND 38 cfr 14.507 (B)-delicious legalize...

In 1997 (when I was in the Gardner Moratorium) Ron Abrams (NVLSP)made a odd comment to me about 1151 and direct SC, we were talking about AO, but he knew I was waiting for the moratorium to lift.

That comment has haunted me from time to time-now I know what he meant -OGC Pres Op 08-97.

It is quite clear that VA still owes me cash. His comment was if I succeeded  1151 and then subsequently with direct SC death, the VA would have to pay all compensation due to veteran or to me as accrued.

that “ the language and legislative history of 38 USC 351 make clear that Congress intended that all veterans monetary benefits payable for service connected disability or death be payable for qualifying disability or death resulting from,among other things, medical examination or treatment in the same manner as though the disability or death had been a result of military service.”

(reference to OGC Pres Op #80-90 as withi OGC Pres Op 08-97.) 351 became 1151 yet did not alter that opinion.)

No one has ever challenged this type of situation before.

I have searched for years to see how VA would handle a 100% P & T  SC disabilty and a 1151 100% P & T  independent disability. And a death that is SC death as well as 1151 FTCA death, as i my husband's case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Bubbleboy929 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use