Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

News From The Ranking Member Of The U.s. Senate Committee On Veterans'

Rate this question


Guest allan

Question

here's some news from our good friend, Sen. Craig.

Please give him the a clap!......................................

********************************************************************************

******

"The expanded

definition in Craig's new legislation, if adopted by Congress, will

allow servicemembers injured outside the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters

of war - from October 7, 2001, but before December 1, 2005 - to receive

payment for their serious injuries. Those injured since 2005 are now

covered irrespective of where their injuries occur."??????

Is this saying that the "boots" on the ground BS, will not be applied to our returning troops this time? I sencerilly hope so. allan

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

NEWS FROM THE RANKING MEMBER OF THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS'

AFFAIRS

NEW LEGISLATION TO HELP INJURED SERVICEMEMBERS

Craig's current law has paid out $183 million to over 2,800 wounded

in-theater since war began

January 8, 2006

Media contact: Jeff Schrade (202)224-9093

(Washington, DC) Hundreds of servicemembers injured outside of Iraq and

Afghanistan could benefit from new legislation introduced this week by

U.S. Senator Larry Craig, the top Republican on the U.S. Senate

Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

"The wounded warrior legislation we passed in 2005 has provided

tremendous financial assistance to servicemembers who have been

seriously injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. But some deserving

individuals serving outside those theaters of war were left out of the

original legislation, so we are moving forward to help them as soon as

possible," said Craig, the immediate past chairman of the committee.

The new bill, S. 225 <http://www.congress.gov> , is cosponsored by new

Chairman Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii).

Craig authored the original "Wounded Warrior" legislation two years ago

after meeting with three young veterans who had either lost limbs or had

been blinded in combat. In an overwhelming show of support for the

troops, Congress passed the bill within weeks after it was introduced.

It has since provided payments ranging from $25,000 to $100,000 - an

average of $65,000 per servicemember.

The money has helped the injured and their families cope with the

financial impact of long recuperation periods following the loss of

limbs, blindness, severe burns and other trauma.

But as Craig's original legislation moved forward two years ago, an

amendment making the benefit retroactive to 2001 - when the start on the

war on terror began - excluded those not in combat areas. The expanded

definition in Craig's new legislation, if adopted by Congress, will

allow servicemembers injured outside the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters

of war - from October 7, 2001, but before December 1, 2005 - to receive

payment for their serious injuries. Those injured since 2005 are now

covered irrespective of where their injuries occur.

Craig said that former Seaman Robert Roeder would be one of those who

would benefit from the change. Last January, as the aircraft carrier USS

Kitty Hawk was steaming to the Middle East, Roeder's left leg was

severed above the knee by an arresting wire during flight operations.

In a speech prepared for delivery on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Craig

shared Roeder's story, while noting that "military service is universal

in character" and that the proposed new law is consistent with how

Congress handled retroactive payments for other benefit programs.

Under current law, over 2,800 servicemembers nationwide have received

over $183 million. Eighteen of those individuals are in Craig's home

state of Idaho. Collectively those Idahoans have received $1.025

million.

####

* Feel free to send this news to your circle of friends, and/or

use in your publication as you see fit. If a friend sent this to and

you want to be on the list... send us an e-mail

* Are you receiving both "text" and "picture" versions of these

news releases - but only want one version? Let us know if you want

"text" or "pictures" and the change will be made.

* If you need a higher resolution photo from any of the news

releases you receive, contact Jeff Schrade by phone or e-mail...

* No longer want these great news items in your inbox? Send a

kind note with the words "delete me" to: jeff_schrade@vetaff.senate.gov

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Allan- here is the email I got from Jeff Schrade- I don't know what payments they are talking about-

I think it has something to do with the Wounded Warrior project and SDGLI-

http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/site/...LEGISLATION.htm

Anyone know what it actually refers too?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEWS FROM THE RANKING MEMBER OF THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS

NEW LEGISLATION TO HELP INJURED SERVICEMEMBERS

Craig’s current law has paid out $183 million to over 2,800 wounded in-theater since war began

Sen. Craig, above, introducing the original wounded warrior legislation in 2005. His new bill expands coverage to those not now covered.

January 8, 2006

Media contact: Jeff Schrade (202)224-9093

(Washington, DC) Hundreds of servicemembers injured outside of Iraq and Afghanistan could benefit from new legislation introduced this week by U.S. Senator Larry Craig, the top Republican on the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

"The wounded warrior legislation we passed in 2005 has provided tremendous financial assistance to servicemembers who have been seriously injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. But some deserving individuals serving outside those theaters of war were left out of the original legislation, so we are moving forward to help them as soon as possible," said Craig, the immediate past chairman of the committee.

The new bill, S. 225, is cosponsored by new Chairman Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii).

Craig authored the original "Wounded Warrior" legislation two years ago after meeting with three young veterans who had either lost limbs or had been blinded in combat. In an overwhelming show of support for the troops, Congress passed the bill within weeks after it was introduced. It has since provided payments ranging from $25,000 to $100,000 – an average of $65,000 per servicemember.

The money has helped the injured and their families cope with the financial impact of long recuperation periods following the loss of limbs, blindness, severe burns and other trauma.

But as Craig’s original legislation moved forward two years ago, an amendment making the benefit retroactive to 2001 – when the start on the war on terror began – excluded those not in combat areas. The expanded definition in Craig’s new legislation, if adopted by Congress, will allow servicemembers injured outside the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters of war – from October 7, 2001, but before December 1, 2005 – to receive payment for their serious injuries. Those injured since 2005 are now covered irrespective of where their injuries occur.

Craig said that former Seaman Robert Roeder would be one of those who would benefit from the change. Last January, as the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk was steaming to the Middle East, Roeder’s left leg was severed above the knee by an arresting wire during flight operations.

In a speech prepared for delivery on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Craig shared Roeder’s story, while noting that "military service is universal in character" and that the proposed new law is consistent with how Congress handled retroactive payments for other benefit programs.

Under current law, over 2,800 servicemembers nationwide have received over $183 million. Eighteen of those individuals are in Craig’s home state of Idaho. Collectively those Idahoans have received $1.025 million.

####

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use