Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Under the new Appeals Modernization Act, has the VA changed the NOD form ?

Rate this question


63Charlie

Question

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Yes.  You need to read up on it, when appealing.  It would appear that there is no room for error..even on the form number.  You have choices to make, too.  Even if you are familiar with RAMP and the choices..there is a problem.  You see, most of us dont get to see our RBA before we make that choice..so, do we need new evidence or not?  How are we supposed to know what evidence VA has (had) in their possession, when we normally dont get to see the RBA until after the board decision?  

Sure, we can order a copy of our cfile, but, by the time we get it, its certainly out of date, and VA may well have hit "delete" a few times.  The answer, of course, is to grant Veterans the right to see their own VBMS electronic record...and why not?  They dont have to give us permission to alter the file..there is a permissions called "read only", so why can we not read our own file, just as a VSO or attorney does?    Of course, there is a problem with both attorney's and VSO's.

1.  Attorneys.  There are 3 problems here.  First, of course, is the cost.  Second is often we wait because of the cost until we are so frustrated with VA that we give up and pay the attorney fees.   Lastly, even if we were okay with paying the 20 percent, the attorney can not enter our claim stream until AFTER the denial, so there already had to be something gone amuck.  

2.  VSO's.    There are at least 3 problems here, too.  V....S....O.  

Veteran.  Because we are a Veteran, we are not beleived.  A doctor is beleived.  A VSO is beleived.  A VA employee is beleived.  But, not a Veteran when he is a claimant.  Everything we say is considered false until the VA knows otherwise. 

Service.  What part of "Service" is there that VSO's dont return phone calls?  They dont respond to our letters either.  Mostly, they rarely keep copies of documents submitted, and, mostly, there is no liablility when the VSO offers bad advice..no matter how bad.  "Aw heck, dont appeal that rating..you will get reduced instead."  

Officer.  The VSO pretty much has zero authority to do anything..but maybe fill in some forms..and the Veteran can do that.  If an "officer" could arrest corrupt VA employees, it may mean something.  Unfortunately, the VSO does have the authority to see our VBMS, but why would he want to look at that?  It could just create more work for himself, if he identifies an unclaimed issue, a cue, or a nod that needed filing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use