Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Shin splint rating question

Rate this question


RBrogen

Question

Hi Everyone,

I was wondering if you could shed some light on how the VA might rate bilateral shin splints with this info.  Note I am already rated arthritis in both knees and ankles at 10% for each of those.  I would think that 38 CFR 5262 would be the rating code

C&P Report

    Right Ankle:   Dorsiflexion = 0-15 degrees / Plantar Flexion 0 to 30 degrees
    Left Ankle:  Dorsiflexion = 0-10 degrees / Plantar Flexion 0 to 30 degrees
    Moderate Pain

   Left/Right Knee Moderate pain decreased ROM = 70 degrees

As always, thanks for all of your opinions.

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
57 minutes ago, Mrpdbo said:

Don't know if it's the case for everyone but they folded my shin splints in with patellafemoral pain syndrome for 10%.

My shin splints affect ROM of both ankles and knees which I believe will be a separate rating to the pain as it is a distinct difference condition.  Additionally, I have the 10% for L/R Knees and L/R Ankles for arthritis.

rackamall.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, RBrogen said:

My shin splints affect ROM of both ankles and knees which I believe will be a separate rating to the pain as it is a distinct difference condition.  Additionally, I have the 10% for L/R Knees and L/R Ankles for arthritis.

The way it was explained to me is that shin splints are lumped into painful ROM (knee or ankle) unless the tibia/fibia have fused together, in which case they can be rated separately.  Probably best to wait and see what they grant you after a decision is rendered since the CFR isn't entirely clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Well, I have no idea if your shin splints are "chronic" or acute.  If they are acute, they often resolve themselves, or respond to treatment.  The Va does not compensate us for "acute" pain, only chronic conditions.  Example, if we sprain our ankle, and it hurts a few weeks or even months, then gets better with no complications, then its pretty much non compensable.  

If you have chronic shin splints, that reoccur or last for years, then are likely compensable, to the extent they limit ROM or with pain.  

More on shin splints here:

https://www.webmd.com/fitness-exercise/shin-splints#1

Even a fracture, that heals up with no problems later is not likely to be compensable.  I fractured my leg in service, they put on a cast, and it healed.  Now, I have arthritis in that joint, and, as yet, its still NSC.  I applied for benefits for it years ago, they decided "not to adjuticate it" with a decision but instead listed it as NSC on one of my rating sheets.  I guess they knew if they denied it, I would appeal.  So they just never adjutciated it, a violation of 38 cfr 3.103.  

I will probably know by the end of this year if it will make a difference or not, frankly Im unwilling to put up with the VA's BS for 0 compensation.  It shouldnt make a difference in the effective date, I have already demonstrated I applied.  

Maybe I will blow their mind applying for an "increase".  They wont know what to do since its not sc, how can they increase it??  

It makes me feel like Curly of the 3 stooges:  

"Nyert, nyert, nyert".  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use